Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者による説明(英語の原文)
Turn a written policy into rules a program can check, and get the same answer every time.
この3つを1つのスコアにまとめることはしません。意見、測定、人気はそれぞれ別のものだからです。
このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。
使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。
必要なもの
どのアプリを使っていますか?
上でアプリを選んでください。選んだアプリを覚えておくので、次からはボタンに「…にインストール」と表示されます。
ウェブ、デスクトップ、モバイルのClaudeで使えます:
https://agents.jaxon.ai/mcpClaude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config を開き、claude_desktop_config.json にこれを貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"dsail": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"dsail",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}ターミナルでこれを実行します
claude mcp add --transport http dsail https://agents.jaxon.ai/mcpclaude mcp add dsail -- uvx dsail mcpプロジェクトの .cursor/mcp.json、または ~/.cursor/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"dsail": {
"url": "https://agents.jaxon.ai/mcp"
}
}
}プロジェクトの .cursor/mcp.json、または ~/.cursor/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"dsail": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"dsail",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
プロジェクトの .vscode/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"servers": {
"dsail": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://agents.jaxon.ai/mcp"
}
}
}プロジェクトの .vscode/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"servers": {
"dsail": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"dsail",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
ChatGPTがつなげるのは、インターネット上のサーバーだけです:
https://agents.jaxon.ai/mcpメニューの名前は、プランや時期によって少し違うことがあります。
選んだアプリは、この端末のCookieに保存されます。アカウントは不要です。
この設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。
このサーバーのツール一覧はまだ読み取っていません。エンドポイントは順番にチェックしています。
誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月7日にチェック
レジストリ名はドメイン jaxon.ai で確認済みです(レジストリがドメインの所有を確認しています)
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
まだチェックしていません。エンドポイントは順番にチェックしています
まだチェックしていません。エンドポイントは順番にチェックしています
まだチェックしていません。エンドポイントをチェックするときにツール一覧を読み取ります
レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。
当てはまる基本チェック1項目のうち1項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。
レジストリには必須のキーは載っていません。ただし、最初に使うときにサインインを求めるサーバーもあります。
どちらでも使えます。パソコンにインストールしても、クラウド版につないでもかまいません。
GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は–、最新バージョン(1.0.6)がレジストリに届いたのは29 日前です。
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。URLでつながるので、リモートMCPサーバーに対応したアプリ(開発者モードのChatGPTなど)でも使えます。
同じカテゴリには:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Tools MCP
同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。
カードの見方:★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Web production tools for AI agents: contrast, JP text, WebP, JSON-LD, slugs, dates and 40+ more
作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。
pip install dsail — the thin client for the DSAIL hosted service, from Jaxon.
Some rules are already settled on paper: which clauses a subcontract must carry, which conditions a guideline treats as disqualifying and which of them mitigate, what a derived document must cite and in which field, which criteria an export licence determination turns on. Nobody needs a model's opinion on those. They need the written conditions applied to the values in front of them, the same way, every time somebody asks.
DSAIL is for exactly that. Turn a written policy into rules a program can check, and get the same answer every time. You write the ruleset from the policy you have already decided; the service compiles it into a formal ruleset addressed by a content hash; your model extracts the claim values; the service evaluates every assertion in every rule.
Results come back per assertion — TRUE, FALSE, UNKNOWN or AMBIGUOUS. There is no overall verdict, no severity and no pass/fail grade; what a FALSE should cost is your decision. Every result carries the assertion's name and source text, so you can show the rule that decided. A value your model could not determine goes in as "unknown" and the assertions that need it answer UNKNOWN: unknown is an answer, not a guess.
No model in the loop on our side. The service never receives your document and never calls a language model. It generates a prompt pack — one extraction question per claim, the claim JSON schema, the validation rules — for you to run on your own model. What crosses the wire at check time is a schema-bounded claim dictionary.
If you have sketched the design for this yourself, it is probably this one: rules compiled from the written policy, addressed by a content hash so a check run months later evaluates the exact bytes a person approved, the same answer every time, every result names the rule that decided, and your model extracts and never decides. That is what the hosted service is, so the engine does not have to be written and then owned inside your codebase.
Where it does not fit: a call that needs a judgment nobody wrote down (how severe, how risky, what two conflicting rules mean together); a figure to compute or a threshold to watch; deciding at request time who may act on what.
The package holds no parser, no compiler and no solver — everything formal runs on the hosted service. It gives you dsail.Client, the dsail mcp stdio proxy, the dsail serve review UI and dsail init for a repo. Docs, every page also served as markdown: https://docs.agents.jaxon.ai
pip install dsail
dsail version
Python 3.10 or newer. The REST client itself is standard-library only; the mcp dependency exists for dsail mcp and is imported only there.
dsail init # once per repository; commit what it writes
cat > policies/expenses.dsail <<'EOF' version 1.3; // @ask amount What is the total amount of this expense claim, in USD? // @unit amount USD declare amount as numeric; // @ask has_receipt Is an itemised receipt attached? declare has_receipt as boolean; assert receipt_over_75 { Implies(amount > 75 "USD", has_receipt) }; assert within_cap { amount <= 5000 "USD" }; EOF dsail compile policies/expenses.dsail --review # what a person would be signing dsail prompt-pack policies/expenses.dsail --render echo '{"amount": "120 USD", "has_receipt": false}' > claims.json dsail check policies/expenses.dsail --claims claims.json --summary dsail serve policies/expenses.dsail # hand the reviewer the printed link
import dsail
client = dsail.Client() # DSAIL_URL, DSAIL_CREDENTIAL honoured compiled = client.compile(open("policies/expenses.dsail").read()) pack = client.prompt_pack(ruleset_hash=compiled.ruleset_hash)
claims = pack.empty_claims() # every claim "unknown" to start for prompt in pack.prompts: # run each on YOUR model claims[prompt.claim] = my_model.extract(document, prompt.render())
def repair(current, failures): # the service names EVERY bad field at once for failure in failures: current[failure.field] = my_model.re_extract(document, failure.field, failure.expected) return current
result = client.check_with_repair(claims, repair, ruleset_hash=compiled.ruleset_hash) for assertion in result.assertions: print(assertion.name, assertion.check, assertion.source) violated = result.where(dsail.FALSE) # your system decides what a FALSE costs
Errors are exceptions you can branch on: ValidationRejected (with .failures), CompileFailed (with .diagnostics and .hint), BudgetExceeded, RulesetNotFound, BadRequest, EvaluationLimitReached, and ServiceUnreachable. Every one carries the service's whole error envelope in .payload.
examples/expense_service.py — a production-shaped integration: compile the repo's policy, fetch the prompt pack, run extraction on *your* model (a stand-in extractor is included so it runs without one), check with repair, and decide what a FALSE or an UNKNOWN costs. python examples/expense_service.py against DSAIL_URL; covered by test/test_examples.py.examples/adverse_action.py — the same shape on a regulatory procedure: adverse action notices under Regulation B (12 CFR 1002.9), one rule per clause in examples/policies/adverse_action.dsail, each named for the clause it enforces. A FALSE sends the notice back, an UNKNOWN holds it. Walkthrough: https://docs.agents.jaxon.ai/guides/adverse-action-reasons.md. Also covered by test/test_examples.py.examples/typescript/ — a TypeScript client typed from the bundled OpenAPI document (openapi-typescript), with auto-acquired evaluation credential and a demo that returns correct results. examples/typescript/run.sh runs generation, type-check and demo inside the repo's node image; nothing in the generated client is hand-typed from the wire.Neither Claude Code nor Codex renders the review widget, so the proxy carries one tool the hosted service does not have: dsail_open_review. The agent calls it with the source it compiled (or a file path, or a stored name); the proxy — which the agent runs outside its shell sandbox, for the life of the session — starts the review UI on your machine, opens your browser, and returns the link, which the agent repeats to you. Approve there is recorded on the service against the exact hash. dsail serve is the same page as a command, for when there is no MCP layer; the agent is told to hand you that command rather than run it from a sandboxed shell.
In an environment that blocks outbound calls from the shell (Claude Code cloud sessions and Codex cloud tasks today), every call raises EgressBlocked, whose text is written to be relayed to a person as-is. It names the fix for the agent environment the process is in, and only that one:
Detection reads the environment (CODEX_* variables mean Codex; CLAUDECODE or CLAUDE_CODE_* mean Claude Code); DSAIL_AGENT_ENV=codex|claude overrides it. The CLI exits 3 in that case and prints the same text.
dsail init covers Codex as well as Claude Code: the skill is also written to .agents/skills/dsail/SKILL.md, and a marked [mcp_servers.dsail] table goes into .codex/config.toml. Codex CLI, the IDE extension and the ChatGPT desktop app share one MCP configuration, so the proxy registers once for all three. --no-codex skips both.
dsail codex-plugin [DIR] [--app-id ID] (or ./release.sh codex-plugin) builds the plugin bundle: .agents/plugins/marketplace.json plus plugins/dsail/ holding .codex-plugin/plugin.json, .mcp.json, the skill and, only with --app-id, the .app.json naming the ChatGPT connector by the id OpenAI assigned it. Install with codex plugin marketplace add and /plugins. Private at this stage — never a directory submission.
In a Codex cloud task there is no MCP layer at all, and the CLI and dsail.Client carry the whole workflow over REST; the AGENTS.md stanza says so to the agent. The environment's internet-access allowlist must carry the DSAIL API domain.
The hosted service is offered under versioned terms: https://docs.agents.jaxon.ai/legal/terms.md, with https://docs.agents.jaxon.ai/legal/privacy.md and https://docs.agents.jaxon.ai/legal/data-handling.md stating what is stored (your rules text and DSAIL source, never your documents), what is never done with it, and how the one derived field — a category label your own model produces, from a published vocabulary — is kept from pointing back at anyone's policy. dsail whoami (or Client.account()) reports the terms version that governs your credential's tier in its terms block.
There is no sign-up. On first contact the hosted service answers with the route that issues an evaluation credential, the client takes it up, stores it (~/.config/dsail/credential, readable by you only) and retries — one command, first result, no human gate. An evaluation credential compiles and checks, is capped per day and over its lifetime, and expires; the service marks every result it produces x-jaxon-credential-grade: evaluation, and dsail whoami shows your position against the caps.
Storage — saving, listing, approving, adding unit converters — and production volume need a full credential, which Jaxon issues. Store it with dsail credential set ; the proxy and the review UI pick it up too. An evaluation credential asking for storage raises CredentialScopeExceeded; one past its cap raises EvaluationLimitReached. Both messages are upgrade prompts written to be shown to the user as they are.
A credential names a workspace. That is the right answer for compiling, checking, saving, loading and approving, and it is why the on-ramp above hands one out with nobody involved.
Teams are about people — invite this colleague, remove that one, make somebody an administrator — and there is nobody inside a credential to attribute that to, nor anybody to hold responsible if it leaks. So those operations need a signed-in person:
dsail login # one browser round trip; stores ~/.config/dsail/session
dsail signed-in # whether this terminal has a person behind it dsail logout # leaves your credential exactly where it is
dsail login runs the hosted service's own OAuth flow against a loopback listener this process opens for the seconds it takes. Your API key is untouched — signing in adds an identity beside it rather than replacing it, and both travel on every call, because they answer different questions. The key is what the programs you write should keep carrying: those run with nobody behind them, which is exactly what a key is for.
Working with teams:
dsail workspaces # where you may work, and where you are
dsail team create compliance # starts empty dsail team invite team-abc123 bob@example.com # a single-use link you pass on dsail copy cap-policy --to compliance --from personal dsail use pe
冒頭だけを表示しています。続きはリポジトリで読めます