Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者による説明(英語の原文)
Runtime gate for AI agent claims. Catches sycophantic drift, circular self-validation, causal errors
この3つを1つのスコアにまとめることはしません。意見、測定、人気はそれぞれ別のものだからです。
このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。
使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。
Authorization「秘密」と表示された値は、あなたのアカウントの鍵です。絶対に人に教えたり、チャットに貼り付けたりしないでください。
必要なもの
どのアプリを使っていますか?
上でアプリを選んでください。選んだアプリを覚えておくので、次からはボタンに「…にインストール」と表示されます。
このアドレスはリクエストの header にキーが必要ですが、コネクタを追加するメニューでは設定できません。代わりにClaude Code、Cursor、VS Codeを使ってください。
ターミナルでこれを実行します
claude mcp add --transport sse eif https://eif.leocelis.com/sse --header 'Authorization: Bearer {api_key}'動かす前に、空欄の値を入力してください。
プロジェクトの .cursor/mcp.json、または ~/.cursor/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"eif": {
"url": "https://eif.leocelis.com/sse",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "Bearer {api_key}"
}
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
プロジェクトの .vscode/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"servers": {
"eif": {
"type": "sse",
"url": "https://eif.leocelis.com/sse",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "Bearer {api_key}"
}
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
このアドレスはリクエストの header にキーが必要ですが、コネクタを追加するメニューでは設定できません。代わりにClaude Code、Cursor、VS Codeを使ってください。
選んだアプリは、この端末のCookieに保存されます。アカウントは不要です。
Authorization 秘密 必須 HTTP headerこの設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。
このサーバーは、ツール一覧を表示する前にサインインを求めます。
誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月6日にチェック
レジストリ名は、リポジトリを所有するGitHubアカウント leocelis で確認済みです
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
592ミリ秒で応答(HTTP 401)
キーやトークンを自分でコピーして貼り付ける必要があります
まだチェックしていません。エンドポイントをチェックするときにツール一覧を読み取ります
レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。
当てはまる基本チェック3項目のうち2項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。
入力が必要なもの:Authorization
作者のクラウドで動きます。インストール不要でインターネット経由でつながりますが、送った内容は作者のサーバーを通ります。
GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は–、最新バージョン(4.2.0)がレジストリに届いたのは昨日です。
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。URLでつながるので、リモートMCPサーバーに対応したアプリ(開発者モードのChatGPTなど)でも使えます。
同じカテゴリには:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Symantec Cloud DLP AIops
同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。
カードの見方:★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Governed Symantec Cloud DLP — 14 MCP tools, read-only with audit.
作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。
EIF - Epistemic Integrity Framework
Apply the scientific method to every assumption your AI agent makes.
AI agents compound errors. Each assumption that goes unchallenged becomes the foundation for the next one. A 90%-accurate agent running 10-step tasks produces correct output only 35% of the time - that's the compound error curve. That 0.9^10 curve is an upper bound: it assumes independent, non-recoverable per-step errors, whereas real pipelines have correlated and recoverable steps, so EIF's value is framed as reducing the error rate per load-bearing step rather than as the literal compound figure. In high-stakes domains (compliance, engineering decisions, financial advice), this translates to real cost.
The dominant source of that cost is not hallucinated facts, but unchallenged assumptions that are never tested against evidence.
EIF goes past a naive hallucination check: it tests each claim against independent evidence before the agent acts, then routes it to ACT, REVISE or HALT.
EIF is a Python library and MCP server that runs an 8-phase scientific-method pipeline on every load-bearing assumption in an agent's response:
DECLARE → name every assumption: KNOWN / ASSUMED / GUESSED
FALSIFY → collect independent evidence via P1 code, P2 tools, P3 web search CAUSAL_GATE → check Pearl causal level; flag confounders and disjunctive bias CALIBRATE → Bayesian posterior update (prior × likelihood → route) CHALLENGE → adversarial critic produces counter-evidence and competing hypothesis UPDATE → sequential Bayes update; EIG stopping rule EXPLAIN → hard-to-vary check (Deutsch): every detail must be functionally irreplaceable RECORD → provenance record with EU AI Act compliance mapping
Plus auxiliary gates that run before/after the core loop:
INPUT_GUARD → detect adversarial or manipulative inputs before the pipeline runs
SYCOPHANCY_GATE → detect position drift, unfaithful CoT, and face-preserving framing HYPOTHESIS_AGENDA → rank claims by Expected Information Gain before FALSIFY REPLICATE → pre-registered replication protocol for cross-session reproducibility PROGRAMME → Lakatos health monitor: PROGRESSIVE / STABLE / DEGENERATIVE
At the end of each turn, EIF routes the agent's output:
EIF was validated against 14 multi-agent conversation scenarios across 5 domains (clinical, engineering, compliance, investment, M&A).
Scope note: the 14-scenario corpus is constructed and illustrative - it demonstrates the mechanisms, not field results. A separate field-validation track on real agent traffic is the basis for production false-positive measurement. EIF can also estimate a modeled dollar cost per HALT-routed claim (a distinct feature); those figures and their methodology live in
validation/CORPUS_REPORT.md, not here.
| Scenario | Domain | Turns | HALT | REVISE | ACT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S8v31 ML Model Deployment (FDA SaMD) | clinical | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| S7v31 Code Review / API Security | engineering | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| S6v31 Investment Decision - Series A | investment | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| S10 Sycophancy Validation | investment | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| S11 Sycophancy Market Gap | investment | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| S20 Sycophancy Full-Signal | compliance | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| S18 Reasoning Theater | compliance | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| S19b Model Scaling Ablation (gpt-4o) | investment | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| S16 REVERSED CEP - Beta-carotene/CARET | clinical | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| S15 CAUSAL_GATE v4 - Phase 3 Protocol | clinical | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| S9v31 M&A Due Diligence | manda | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| S14 EXPLAIN Cold-Start Baseline | engineering | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| S17 Disjunctive Bias - clinical supplements | clinical | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| S19a Model Scaling Ablation (gpt-4o-mini) | investment | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| TOTAL | 84 | 35 | 25 | 15 |
P4 (circular LLM self-validation) rate: 0.0% across all 14 scenarios. Every piece of evidence came from an independent source - executable code, coordinator tool outputs, or live web search.
Full evidence: validation/CORPUS_REPORT.md. Per-scenario reports available on request via GitHub Discussions.
pip install -e ".[mcp]" # local dev (the MCP extra powers the examples below)
import asyncio
from eif import session as session_store from eif.mcp_server.server import eif_extract_claims_from_decision, eif_verify
async def run(): sess = await session_store.new_session() sid = sess.session_id
extracted = eif_extract_claims_from_decision( "Commission a 10-article series on Hollow Ascent. " "The game has 5,000+ IGDB hype followers and strong community demand." )
result = await eif_verify( session_id=sid, decision="Commission content series based on IGDB metrics", claims=extracted["claims"], )
print(f"Verdict: {result['verdict']}") # "HALT" or "PASS" for card in result["halt_cards"]: print(card)
asyncio.run(run())
When your agent has access to an authoritative data source (IGDB, your database, an internal API), register it as a P0 host tool. EIF calls it directly - no web search, no guessing.
from eif.falsify.evidence_collector import HostTool, HostToolRegistry
def igdb_lookup(query: str) -> str: import requests resp = requests.get("https://api.igdb.com/v4/games", ...) # your IGDB call return str(resp.json())
registry = HostToolRegistry([ HostTool( name="igdb_api", description="IGDB game database - hype count, ratings, community size", capability_keywords=["igdb", "hype", "game", "demand", "followers"], fn=igdb_lookup, data_scope="PUBLIC", ) ])
P0 is the highest-priority evidence tier. Without a registered tool, EIF falls back to web search (P3), which can return false-positive SUPPORTS for specific numeric metrics. For production use, register the tool.
See examples/quickstart.py for a complete end-to-end example (a different scenario, an infrastructure-migration decision, walking DECLARE through EXPLAIN in one script).
Per-client setup guides (register the server, install the rules block, verify, troubleshoot) live in docs/integrations/: Claude Code · Cursor · Claude Desktop. The short version:
Option A - hosted endpoint (private alpha, zero install):
Request a key by opening a Discussion, then add the config for your client.
Cursor (~/.cursor/mcp.json) and Claude Desktop (~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": { "eif": { "url": "https://eif.leocelis.com/sse", "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_KEY_HERE" } } } }
VS Code / GitHub Copilot (.vscode/mcp.json): use "servers" (not "mcpServers") and add "type": "http" to the entry.
The hosted endpoint is in private alpha. Everything below runs fully on your own machine with no key.
Option B - local venv (works today, fully self-hosted):
{
"mcpServers": { "eif": { "command": "/path/to/venv/bin/python", "args": ["-m", "eif.mcp_server.server"] } } }
Option C - uvx (zero-install, works today):
{
"mcpServers": { "eif": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["--from", "eif-engine[mcp]", "eif-mcp-server"] } } }
uv runs the executable matching the package name by default; since the console scripts are eif-mcp-server / eif-mcp-http-server (not eif-engine), --from is required. Bare uvx eif-engine fails with "An executable named eif-engine is not provided by package eif-engine".
EIF exposes 25 tools your agent can call:
Session (1 tool):
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
eif_new_session | Create a session; every other tool requires its session_id |
Core pipeline (8 tools):
| Tool | Phase | What it does |
|---|---|---|
eif_get_context | - | Load EIF principles into agent context |
eif_declare | DECLARE | Register and classify every assumption |
eif_falsify | FALSIFY | Collect independent evidence; run SPRT |
eif_causal_gate | CAUSAL_GATE | Check Pearl causal level; flag confounders |
eif_calibrate | CALIBRATE | Bayesian posterior; compute routing |
eif_challenge | CHALLENGE | Adversarial critic with counter-evidence |
eif_update | UPDATE | Sequential posterior update; EIG stopping |
eif_explain | EXPLAIN | Hard-to-vary check on the mechanism |
Gates and monitors (5 tools):
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
eif_input_guard | Detect adversarial or manipulative inputs |
eif_sycophancy_gate | Detect position drift, unfaithful CoT, face-preserving framing |
eif_programme_health | Lakatos health monitor for the session |
eif_record | Write provenance record; EU AI Act compliance mapping |
eif_replicate | Pre-registered replication protocol |
Calibration and agenda (4 tools):
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
eif_record_outcome | Log a session's labeled outcome (true/false) for cross-session ECE calibration |
eif_calibration_report | Return ECE state, empirical prior, and sessions-to-grounded count |
eif_catch_rate_report | Empirical HALT catch-rate across all sessions for a domain |
eif_hypothesis_agenda | Rank outstanding hypotheses by Expected Information Gain before FALSIFY |
Utilities (7 tools):
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
eif_verify | One-call full pipeline: declare → falsify → calibrate → route |
eif_extract_claims_from_decision | Extract structured claims from free-form agent text |
eif_compliance_report | Generate EU AI Act compliance report for a session |
eif_provenance |
冒頭だけを表示しています。続きはリポジトリで読めます