Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者による説明(英語の原文)
Meteor scatter planning between two stations: showers, radiant geometry, live counts
この3つを1つのスコアにまとめることはしません。意見、測定、人気はそれぞれ別のものだからです。
このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。
使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。
必要なもの
どのアプリを使っていますか?
上でアプリを選んでください。選んだアプリを覚えておくので、次からはボタンに「…にインストール」と表示されます。
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config を開き、claude_desktop_config.json にこれを貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"meteor": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"meteor-mcp"
]
}
}
}ターミナルでこれを実行します
claude mcp add meteor -- uvx meteor-mcpプロジェクトの .cursor/mcp.json、または ~/.cursor/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"meteor": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"meteor-mcp"
]
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
プロジェクトの .vscode/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"servers": {
"meteor": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"meteor-mcp"
]
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
これはパソコンで動くサーバーですが、ChatGPTがつなげるのはインターネット上のサーバーだけです。ほかのアプリを選んでください。
選んだアプリは、この端末のCookieに保存されます。アカウントは不要です。
この設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。
パソコンで動くサーバーです。インストールすると、ツール一覧がAIアプリに表示されます。
誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月7日にチェック
レジストリ名は、リポジトリを所有するGitHubアカウント qso-graph で確認済みです
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
これはパソコンで動くため、インターネット上のエンドポイントはありません
パソコンで動き、代わりにローカルの設定を使います
パソコンで動くサーバーです。ツール一覧を読み取れるのは、インターネット上のエンドポイントがある場合だけです
レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。
当てはまる基本チェック1項目のうち1項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。
レジストリには必須のキーは載っていません。ただし、最初に使うときにサインインを求めるサーバーもあります。
あなたのパソコンで動きます。必要なときにAIアプリが起動し、データは作者のサーバーを通りません(サーバー自体がオンラインサービスを呼び出す場合を除きます)。
GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は–、最新バージョン(0.4.1)がレジストリに届いたのは9 日前です。
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。パソコンにPython (uv)も必要です。
同じカテゴリには:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Detailing Manager
同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。
カードの見方:★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Connect your auto detailing studio's tasks, cars, clients and revenue to Claude or ChatGPT.
作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。
Meteor scatter planning for amateur radio: can these two stations work each other on this shower, and when.
That is the whole shape of it. Meteor scatter is a point-to-point mode, so a radiant elevation on its own tells an operator nothing they can act on — the question is always about a path between two stations.
Part of the qso-graph project.
Three things, and radiant elevation is only one of them.
1. Path length. Trails burn at about 85–120 km, so a single-hop reflection off something that low works from roughly 400 km to about 2300 km. Shorter and the reflection point would have to be nearly overhead, where there is very little qualifying sky; longer and it sits below both horizons. 800–2000 km is where the geometry is best, and it is what hams actually run.
2. Radiant elevation at the path midpoint — not at either station. The reflection happens near the middle, so that is the sky that matters. Below the horizon there are no trails to reflect from. Very high is also poor, because trails then run down the path rather than across it.
3. The angle between the radiant and the path. This is the one usually left out, and it is the one that decides whether a reflection is geometrically possible at all. A trail reflects specularly only where it is tangent to the ellipsoid with both stations at its foci. Trails running *along* the path can never be tangent to it; trails running *across* it can. So a radiant broadside to the path is good and a radiant up- or down-path is poor — at the very same elevation.
All three are reported, and the verdict says which one decided it.
Because the physics above is a tangency condition, and what a station actually hears also depends on its power, its antenna and the sporadic background. A figure like "73" would imply a precision none of that supports. So the answer is no / marginal / good / best, each with the reason beside it.
Shower radiants, numbers and names are the IAU Meteor Data Center's — the body that names and numbers meteor showers. The package carries the facts read from the MDC's *Established showers* file with its URL and SHA-256 recorded, so the exact edition served is identifiable. The MDC is maintained on an unpaid voluntary basis and asks to be cited; its requested references are returned by meteor_source_info, printed in NOTICE, and travel inside every answer that uses a radiant.
The MDC lists several published solutions per shower, each from a different study. All of them are kept and none is blended — the average of two published radiants is a third that nobody published and no paper stands behind. Tools return the first-listed solution, labelled, and meteor_shower_info gives them all.
Peaks are stored as solar longitude, not as dates, because that is how the catalogue publishes them and it is the right way round: solar longitude names the same point in the stream every year, while a date drifts. This server converts it to the date it falls on in the year you ask about.
Two tools read the network, because only those two report what is happening right now:
| Source | Used for | Licence |
|---|---|---|
| Global Meteor Network | Confirmed meteor counts today, by shower | CC BY 4.0 — attribution is a licence condition, and is returned in the answer |
| NASA CNEOS | Recent fireballs | US government work |
Everything else is computed locally and needs no network at all.
meteor_window needs both ends of the path, but you should not have to retype your own. Your end is optional, and a host that knows the operator's station supplies it — in QG Desktop that is the Station component.
The fields are ADIF's, not invented here:
| ADIF field | Used for |
|---|---|
MY_GRIDSQUARE | The default grid. ADIF permits 2, 4, 6 or 8 characters |
MY_GRIDSQUARE_EXT | Characters 9–12 of a 10- or 12-character locator |
MY_LAT / MY_LON | An exact position, when the station has one |
A grid is what hams actually use, so a locator is the normal input here, not a degraded one. It may carry 4, 6 or 8 characters. Operators often state 6 or 8 for their own station, while a structured on-air exchange may carry only 4. Which modes constrain it is not asserted here: ADIF enumerates every mode and submode but says nothing about payload length, so there is no authority to infer precision from mode — 4 is the safe floor for all of them.
A grid square is a rectangle, though, and its centre is all a locator gives. Nothing here assumes a precision: the slack is computed from the characters each locator actually carried. At 4 characters that is about ±100 km per end, so a path length carries about ±200 km of slack; at 6 it falls to a few km. That is immaterial on a 1100 km path and decisive against a threshold — a path reported as 2250 km could be 2050 to 2450, which straddles the 2300 km single-hop limit. When a limit falls inside that slack the answer says the call cannot be decided at on-air precision, and what would settle it. The slack is reported either way.
So MY_LAT/MY_LON are used when a station has them, and the answer always says which it used and how precisely each end was located.
A 2-character MY_GRIDSQUARE is a legitimate ADIF value but is refused for a path: a Maidenhead field is 10 by 20 degrees, around 1100 km across, which is wider than the entire usable meteor-scatter range. The refusal explains the precision rather than calling the locator invalid, because it isn't.
ADIF's location fields describe the transmitting station, not where the operator is sitting — MY_LAT is *"the logging station's latitude"*. That is what makes a remote operation come out right without a special case: the reflection geometry depends on where the antenna is. ADIF separates the three callsigns for exactly this reason — STATION_CALLSIGN (used over the air), OPERATOR (the person), and OWNER_CALLSIGN (*"the callsign of the OPERATOR's host"*).
So operating a remote station in FN42 from a chair in DN13 gives the FN42 path, and the operator's own location never enters the calculation.
uvx meteor-mcp # run it; nothing to install
No credentials, no accounts, no configuration.
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
meteor_window | Start here. Two grid squares in, and the path, the shower, and the hour-by-hour geometry out |
meteor_showers | Which showers are near their peak now, closest first, with the peak date |
meteor_shower_info | Every published solution for one shower, unaveraged |
meteor_activity | How many meteors the Global Meteor Network has confirmed today, by shower (reads the network) |
meteor_fireballs | Recent fireballs from NASA CNEOS (reads the network) |
meteor_source_info | Where every number comes from, the edition checksum, and how to cite it |
get_version_info | Service version and the catalogue edition carried |
meteor_activity returns the number of confirmed trajectories the Global Meteor Network has recorded today, broken down by IAU shower code. That is not a flux density — meteoroids per square kilometre per hour, corrected for camera coverage and limiting magnitude — which is a different quantity GMN computes separately. The tool is named and documented for what it actually returns. GMN writes the file during the day, so an early read covers a partial day; the generation time comes back with the answer.
meteor-mcp works with any MCP-compatible client. Add the server config and restart.
Add to claude_desktop_config.json (~/Library/Application Support/Claude/ on macOS, %APPDATA%\Claude\ on Windows):
{
"mcpServers": { "meteor": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["meteor-mcp"] } } }
Add to .claude/settings.json:
{
"mcpServers": { "meteor": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["meteor-mcp"] } } }
Configure via Settings > Apps & Connectors, or in your agent definition:
{
"mcpServers": { "meteor": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["meteor-mcp"] } } }
"Can I work EM12 from DN13 on the Perseids tonight, and when?"
"Which meteor showers are near their peak this week?"
"Is the radiant going to be broadside to my path or up it?"
"Is 2100 km too far for single-hop meteor scatter?"
"How many meteors has the Global Meteor Network actually seen today?"
"Show me every published radiant for the Geminids, not an average."
"Were there any fireballs this week?"
Point both antennas near the path bearing, not at the radiant. The reflection happens near the path midpoint; the radiant's position decides whether a trail there can be tangent to your path, not where to aim.
GPL-3.0-or-later. See LICENSE.