Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者による説明(英語の原文)
Manage an Ankr RPC account: API keys, usage, allowlists, billing, teams. Sign in with OAuth.
この3つを1つのスコアにまとめることはしません。意見、測定、人気はそれぞれ別のものだからです。
このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。
使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。
必要なもの
どのアプリを使っていますか?
上でアプリを選んでください。選んだアプリを覚えておくので、次からはボタンに「…にインストール」と表示されます。
ウェブ、デスクトップ、モバイルのClaudeで使えます:
https://mcp.ankr.com/mcpターミナルでこれを実行します
claude mcp add --transport http agent-rpc-management https://mcp.ankr.com/mcpプロジェクトの .cursor/mcp.json、または ~/.cursor/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"agent-rpc-management": {
"url": "https://mcp.ankr.com/mcp"
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
プロジェクトの .vscode/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"servers": {
"agent-rpc-management": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.ankr.com/mcp"
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
ChatGPTがつなげるのは、インターネット上のサーバーだけです:
https://mcp.ankr.com/mcpメニューの名前は、プランや時期によって少し違うことがあります。
選んだアプリは、この端末のCookieに保存されます。アカウントは不要です。
この設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。
このサーバーは、ツール一覧を表示する前にサインインを求めます。
誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月7日にチェック
レジストリ名は、リポジトリを所有するGitHubアカウント w3tech で確認済みです
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
158ミリ秒で応答(HTTP 401)
OAuthでのサインインに対応しているため、AIアプリがログイン画面へ案内してくれます
まだチェックしていません。エンドポイントをチェックするときにツール一覧を読み取ります
レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。
当てはまる基本チェック3項目のうち3項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。
レジストリには必須のキーは載っていません。ただし、最初に使うときにサインインを求めるサーバーもあります。
作者のクラウドで動きます。インストール不要でインターネット経由でつながりますが、送った内容は作者のサーバーを通ります。
GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は–、最新バージョン(0.2.8)がレジストリに届いたのは5 日前です。
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。URLでつながるので、リモートMCPサーバーに対応したアプリ(開発者モードのChatGPTなど)でも使えます。
同じカテゴリには:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, OpenTakeoff
同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。
カードの見方:★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Construction takeoff for AI agents: load plans, set scale, measure, count, export with provenance.
作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。
A Model Context Protocol server that gives AI agents token-efficient access to blockchain data through Ankr RPC.
Reads go out with the TORPC Accept-Token-Tier: 2 header. Tier 1 already renames the fields, turns hex into decimal and drops the service fields (logsBloom, cumulativeGasUsed, header roots). Tier 2 adds the ABI decode on top, so contract calls and event logs come back as named arguments.
A live run over 21 methods and 25 Ethereum mainnet blocks, token-weighted and counted with o200k_base over the full HTTP body, came out 48.4% smaller at tier 2 and 35.3% smaller at tier 1. Decode-heavy reads save the most: eth_getTransactionByHash 69.0%, eth_getTransactionReceipt 64.5%, eth_getBlockReceipts 60.3%, the block methods 40.4%, eth_getLogs 28.9%; scalar reads save 9–19%. Per-method figures: live-token-savings-2026-07-17.md.
Get a free API key at ankr.com/rpc.
The server runs at https://mcp.ankr.com/rpc. Send your key as the x-ankr-api-key header (or Authorization: Bearer ); each request carries the caller's own key, and the server holds no credential of yours.
{
"mcpServers": { "ankr-agent-rpc": { "url": "https://mcp.ankr.com/rpc", "headers": { "x-ankr-api-key": " " } } } }
{
"mcpServers": { "ankr-agent-rpc": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@w3tech.io/agent-rpc-mcp"], "env": { "ANKR_API_KEY": " " } } } }
That JSON goes in your client's MCP config: Claude Desktop (claude_desktop_config.json), Cursor, Windsurf, or any other MCP client. Cursor also accepts the command form:
env ANKR_API_KEY=<YOUR_KEY> npx -y @w3tech.io/agent-rpc-mcp
Raw RPC, TORPC tier 2
| Tool | What it answers |
|---|---|
getTransaction | transaction + receipt by hash, ABI-decoded |
getLogs | event logs, decoded; wide block ranges are chunk-scanned and paged |
getBlock | block header, optionally with decoded transactions |
Indexed and mixed
| Tool | What it answers |
|---|---|
getBalances | native coin + ERC-20 balances with USD |
getAccountBalance | balances across many chains at once |
getWalletActivity | an address's transaction history, paged |
getNFTs | NFTs held by an address |
getTokenHolders | holders of an ERC-20, paged |
getTokenPrice | USD price with chain, asset and as_of provenance |
getTokenPriceHistory | historical price series for a token |
getInteractions | which chains an address has touched, cross-chain |
resolveContract | is-contract, best-effort ERC-20 metadata, EIP-1967 proxy |
searchChain | resolve a tx/block hash, an address, or a block number |
expandResult | continue any paged result from its cursor |
Discovery and escape hatch
| Tool | What it answers |
|---|---|
listChains | supported chains, max TORPC tier, indexer availability |
describeMethods | the param shape and a worked example per JSON-RPC method, plus whether your key may call it on that chain |
rpcCall | any read method the routed tools do not cover |
Sui
Sui is not an EVM chain and is not reached through the JSON-RPC proxy at all: a Sui call goes out over gRPC. getBalances, getBlock, getTransaction, getWalletActivity, getLogs and rpcCall take chain: "sui" and route themselves — getLogs reads Move events over a checkpoint range, filtered by emitting package or module, event type and sender. resolveContract and searchChain are built from eth_* calls Sui has never had and refuse there, naming the tool that answers instead. A Move event row is {contract, event, args}, the same shape an EVM tier-2 log has — but its args arrives at tier 0, decoded by the node rather than from an ABI, so on this path it is not evidence of a tier.
Eight tools serve what Sui has and an EVM chain does not:
| Tool | What it answers |
|---|---|
suiGetObjects | Move objects by id, batched, with their decoded fields |
suiListOwnedObjects | every object an address owns, paged, filterable by Move type |
suiListDynamicFields | tables, bags and dynamic object fields under one object's UID |
suiGetPackage | the modules a published Move package declares |
suiGetFunction | one Move function's signature |
suiResolveName | a SuiNS name to its address, or an address to its name |
suiSimulateTransaction | what a transaction would do, run against current state, never submitted |
suiWatchEvents | Move events from the executed tip on, polled from a resumable cursor |
That is the whole set: 25 tools.
rpcCall will and will not dorpcCall is a read and data escape hatch, never a wallet. It is a write denylist, not a read allowlist: it refuses transaction broadcast and signing, transaction _building_, node and dev-node administration, mutating verbs, and the node-operation half of geth's debug_* namespace — on every chain family — and forwards everything else.
It therefore keeps no list of permitted reads. Which reads exist is decided per chain by the endpoint's blockchain schema and by what your tenant may call, so a forwarded read can still come back refused (Method disabled, reason: restricted by blockchain schema). That refusal is the authoritative answer; listChains reports coverage.
Sign and send transactions with your own wallet or signer.
Two fields decide how to read every result, and an agent that skips them will misread output that is technically correct.
`_meta.tier` — the TORPC tier is negotiated per call and is not guaranteed. On the proxy path a response comes back at tier 0 (raw, undecoded, no args) when it is above the proxy's compression budget, and also when the method is one the proxy does not compress at all, such as eth_call, eth_getCode and eth_getStorageAt. Every successful response carries the tier actually applied in _meta.tier, so check it before looking for decoded fields; an error result carries _meta.error_code instead and no tier at all. Some tools additionally report tier_degraded: true in the body, with a note on how to narrow the request, when they asked for tier 2 on your behalf and got less. Not all of them do, so _meta.tier is the field to rely on. _meta.tier_source says who applied the tier, and the shape rule above is the proxy's alone: on the Sui gRPC path (tier_source: "local") a Move event row carries contract, event and args at tier 0, because the node decodes a Move struct itself.
Decoded amounts are raw base units, with no decimals applied. args.value: "41695680" on a 6-decimal token is 41.69568, not 41 million. Read the token's decimals with resolveContract before reporting a human number.
_meta.token_count is a real o200k_base count of the emitted text, not a chars/4 estimate. It is exact up to 256 KB of emitted text, which covers every display-capped response; above that it is extrapolated and the response carries _meta.token_count_estimated: true. Responses are minified JSON, so a model with a different tokenizer sees a similar but not identical number.
Tool inputs are strict: an unknown argument is rejected with a validation error rather than silently dropped, so a misspelled argument name is reported instead of ignored. Block numbers above 2^53 must be passed as strings, because a JSON number that large is not exact.
| Tier | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 0 | passthrough — standard JSON-RPC |
| 1 | field rename, hex → decimal, and the service fields dropped: logsBloom, cumulativeGasUsed, contractAddress, type, the header roots |
| 2 | tier 1 plus the ABI decode — each log becomes {contract, event, args}, calldata becomes a decoded function with named args |
Negotiation is by header: Accept-Token-Tier: 0|1|2 on the request, Token-Tier on the response. The proxy applies the requested tier only while the response stays inside its compression budget, and that budget is internal to the proxy — so this server never predicts the tier, it detects the applied one and reports it.
On a JSON-RPC batch that header describes the array, not any one element: a response array carries a single Token-Tier, and its value is the minimum tier applied across the elements. v1 defines no per-element tier signal, elements may sit above that floor, and a client reads each element's own tier from the shape the proxy left on it — renamed fields and decimal strings for tier 1, event/args for tier 2 — rather than from the header. So the header is a floor and a signal that a transform was applied; which methods reach tier 2 is declared per method in the descriptor at https://mcp.ankr.com/.well-known/torpc.json, which also ships in the npm package at static/.well-known/torpc.json.
Specification: w3tech/torpc, released under CC0-1.0, with the TORPC docs page as the narrative version. The reference decoder is published as @w3tech.io/torpc-decoder (Apache-2.0); its source and the benchmark harness live in w3tech/torpc-js, under codec/. The EVM tier-1 and tier-2 rules are normative in the spec today; the conformance suite is a scaffold, so no implementation, this one included, claims conformance yet.
Two machine-readable documents describe this deployment. Both are public, carry no credential, and are readable cross-origin.
| Document | Served at |
|---|
冒頭だけを表示しています。続きはリポジトリで読めます