Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)
Policy-based governance for AI agent tool calls. YAML policy, approval gates, audit logging.
이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.
이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.
쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.
AEGIS_POLICY_PATH필요한 것
어떤 앱을 쓰세요?
위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config를 열고 claude_desktop_config.json에 이 내용을 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"aegis": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"agent-aegis"
],
"env": {
"AEGIS_POLICY_PATH": "your-value"
}
}
}
}터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요
claude mcp add aegis --env AEGIS_POLICY_PATH=your-value -- uvx agent-aegis실행하기 전에 빈 값을 채워 주세요.
프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"aegis": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"agent-aegis"
],
"env": {
"AEGIS_POLICY_PATH": "your-value"
}
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"servers": {
"aegis": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"agent-aegis"
],
"env": {
"AEGIS_POLICY_PATH": "your-value"
}
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
이 서버는 내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는데, ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요. 다른 앱을 고르세요.
선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.
AEGIS_POLICY_PATH env이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 설치하면 AI 앱에 도구 목록이 나타나요.
누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 7일 점검
레지스트리 이름이 GitHub 계정 Acacian 기준으로 확인되었고, 이 계정이 저장소를 소유하고 있어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는 서버라 인터넷 엔드포인트가 없어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되며, 대신 로컬 설정을 사용해요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 도구 목록은 인터넷 엔드포인트가 있는 서버에서만 읽을 수 있어요
레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.
해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.
레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. AI 앱이 필요할 때 실행하고, 데이터는 제작자의 서버를 거치지 않아요(서버 자체가 온라인 서비스를 호출하는 경우는 제외).
GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(0.1.7)은 8개월 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. 내 컴퓨터에 Python (uv)도 있어야 해요.
같은 카테고리에는: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Zendesk
같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.
카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Zendesk MCP Pack — tickets, users, organizations via OAuth.
제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.
Agent-Aegis
The governance layer for AI agents. One API, 12 frameworks, every governance primitive.
Aegis is to agent governance what Redis is to data structures — one runtime that unifies prompt-injection blocking, PII masking, policy enforcement, trust delegation, and tamper-evident audit across every agent framework. No code changes.
pip install agent-aegis → aegis.auto_instrument() → 12 frameworks are now governed.
What is Aegis • Primitives • Frameworks • Use Cases • 30-Second Start • Research • Docs • Playground
English • 한국어
Every AI agent framework reinvents the same governance primitives — and each one does it slightly differently. Aegis is the abstraction layer that unifies them.
| Layer | What it does | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Primitives | A universal contract for every tool call | Action, ActionClaim, Policy, Result, DelegationChain, AuditEvent |
| 2. Adapters | Auto-instrument any framework through its own hooks | LangChain callbacks, CrewAI BeforeToolCallHook, OpenAI Agents tracing, Google ADK BasePlugin, MCP transport, DSPy modules, httpx middleware, Playwright context |
| 3. Governance | Declarative primitives you compose into policy | Prompt injection / PII / leak / toxicity guardrails, RBAC, rate limit, cost budget, drift detection, anomaly scoring, trust delegation, justification gap, selection audit, Merkle audit chain |
| 4. Lifecycle | One runtime, every stage of agent ops | Scan → Instrument → Policy CI/CD → Runtime → Proxy → Audit |
import aegis
aegis.auto_instrument() # 12 frameworks governed. No other code changes.
You don't write a LangChain guardrail and a CrewAI guardrail and an OpenAI guardrail — you write one Policy and every framework inherits it.
They solve a different problem, and mostly a text-shaped one. Guardrails AI validates model output against a hub of validators; NeMo Guardrails scripts conversational and tool policy in the Colang DSL; Snyk Agent Scan — Invariant Labs' mcp-scan, since the Snyk acquisition — scans MCP servers and agent skills for known risk patterns and can proxy them at runtime; LLM Guard chained input/output scanners until it was archived in July 2026. Each one you wire in yourself, at a call site you choose. Aegis starts from the other end: auto_instrument() finds the frameworks already installed and instruments them in place, so one Policy covers all of them without a line of agent code changing. What it enforces is agent-shaped rather than prompt-shaped — delegation chains under a monotone trust constraint, audits of what an agent *excluded* rather than what it picked, the distance between an agent's declared intent and its measured impact, and a tamper-evident audit chain. All of it is deterministic, so there is no second model sitting in the request path. These are not exclusive choices: a semantic or model-based detector drops into GuardrailEngine.add() alongside the built-ins.
The contract every adapter maps into. Framework-agnostic by design.
| Primitive | Purpose | Module |
|---|---|---|
| `Action` | Unified representation of any tool / LLM / HTTP / MCP call across all frameworks | aegis.core.action |
| `ActionClaim` | Tripartite structure — Declared (agent-authored) / Assessed (Aegis-computed) / Chain (delegation) | aegis.core.action_claim |
| `Policy` | Declarative YAML rules: match → risk → approval (auto / approve / block) | aegis.core.policy |
| `ClaimPolicy` | Policy layer that evaluates 6-dimensional impact vectors, not just tool names | aegis.core.claim_policy |
| `Guardrails` | Deterministic regex checks for injection, PII, prompt leak, toxicity — 2.65ms cold / <1µs warm | aegis.guardrails |
| `DelegationChain` | Multi-agent hand-off tracking with monotone trust constraint (non-increasing) | aegis.core.agent_identity |
| `AuditEvent` | Tamper-evident append-only log, Merkle-chained, SQLite + JSONL + webhook sinks | aegis.core.merkle_audit |
| `SelectionAudit` | Audits what an agent *excludes*, not just what it picks — detects cosmetic alignment | aegis.core.selection_audit |
| `JustificationGap` | 6D asymmetric scoring: agents declare impact, Aegis independently assesses, gap triggers escalation | aegis.core.justification_gap |
| `CryptoAuditChain` | Ed25519-signed chain for long-term compliance evidence | aegis.core.crypto_audit |
Every governance feature in Aegis — anomaly detection, cost budgets, drift, cascade guards, kill switches — is a composition of these primitives. Read the Concepts guide to see how they fit together.
One API. 12 agent frameworks + 3 protocol-level adapters.
| Framework | Hook | Integration |
|---|---|---|
| Google ADK | BasePlugin lifecycle (tool calls, agent routing, sessions) | Native — the patch only installs the plugin |
| CrewAI | global BeforeToolCallHook, Crew.kickoff/kickoff_async | Hybrid — native hook for tool calls, patch for crew entry |
| Pydantic AI | AbstractCapability · Agent.run/run_sync | Native (opt-in) · Patch (auto) |
| OpenAI Agents SDK | tool_input_guardrail/tool_output_guardrail · Runner.run/run_sync | Native (opt-in) · Patch (auto) |
| LangChain | BaseChatModel.invoke/ainvoke, BaseTool.invoke/ainvoke | Patch |
| OpenAI API | Completions.create (chat & completions) | Patch |
| Anthropic API | Messages.create | Patch |
| LiteLLM | completion, acompletion | Patch |
| Google GenAI | Models.generate_content (new + legacy) | Patch |
| LlamaIndex | LLM.chat/achat/complete/acomplete on every concrete subclass, BaseQueryEngine.query/aquery | Patch |
| Instructor | Instructor.create, AsyncInstructor.create | Patch |
| DSPy | Module.__call__, LM.forward/aforward | Patch |
| MCP | Transport-layer proxy for any MCP server (stdio / HTTP) | Proxy — no patching |
| httpx | HttpxExecutor for raw HTTP egress (REST agents, webhooks) | Wrapper — no patching |
| Playwright | PlaywrightExecutor for browsing agents | Wrapper — no patching |
auto_instrument() detects what's installed and patches only those — no hard dependencies. Custom adapters use the same BaseAdapter interface. Every adapter above is exercised against the current upstream release daily by the integration workflow, which drives each framework's real entrypoint and asserts a guardrail fires — the unit suite fakes these frameworks, so it cannot see upstream drift on its own.
Integration policy. Native extension points win wherever one exists that can actually *block* — Google ADK's BasePlugin and CrewAI's BeforeToolCallHook both do, and there auto_instrument() patches only enough to install the native object. Pydantic AI and the OpenAI Agents SDK ship native implementations you opt into (AbstractCapability, tool_input_guardrail) alongside a patch-based path for the zero-code case. Everything else is patched because no blocking hook exists: the raw OpenAI/Anthropic SDKs and DSPy expose none, and LlamaIndex's instrumentation dispatcher emits events but swallows handler exceptions, so it can observe and not enforce.
The Pydantic AI integration is the reason this policy is written down. It was monkey-patched until core maintainer DouweM reviewed it — *"It doesn't look like those features are actually exposed as Pydantic AI capabilities?"* — and was rebuilt on the native extension API in response (src/aegis/contrib/pydantic_ai.py; the review is pydantic-ai#4888).
Patching is the fallback, not the preference — it is the part most exposed to upstream change, which is why the integration workflow exists.
| Guardrail | Default | What it catches |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt injection | Block | 13 attack categories, 109 patterns, 9 languages (EN/KO/ZH/JA/ES/DE/FR/TH/VI) |
| PII detection | Warn | 13 categories (email, credit card, SSN, IBAN, API keys, etc.) |
| Prompt leak | Warn | System prompt extraction attempts |
| Toxicity | Warn | Harmful, violent, or abusive content |
| MCP STDIO injection | Block | JSON-RPC injection, frame concatenation, unicode escape bypass (OX Security advisory) |
Deterministic regex — no LLM calls, no network. 2.65ms cold / <1µs warm per check.
The same primitives, five different entry points. Pick whichever matches your workflow.
One line. Any framework.
import aegis
aegis.auto_instrument()
Or zero code changes — AEGIS_INSTRUMENT=1 python my_agent.py. Injection blocking, PII masking, prompt-leak warnings, audit trail, and policy enforcement become active for every LangChain / CrewAI / OpenAI / Anthropic / LiteLLM / ADK / DSPy / LlamaIndex / Pydantic AI call.
Pydantic AI native capability — no monkey-patching, explicit per-agent control:
from pydantic_ai import Agent
from aegis.contrib.pydantic_ai import AegisCapability
agent = Agent( "openai:gpt-4o-mini", capabilities=[AegisCapability.default()], # injection, PII, toxicity, prompt-leak, hallucination ) result = await agent.run("What is AI governance?")
[Full Pydantic AI integration guide →](https://acacian.github.io/aegis/cookbook/pydantic-ai
앞부분만 보여 드려요. 나머지는 저장소에서 읽어 보세요