GitHub
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)
Passive AppSec scanners as eight parameterless MCP tools; the audited repository is data.
이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.
이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.
쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.
APPSEC_LANGS필요한 것
어떤 앱을 쓰세요?
위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config를 열고 claude_desktop_config.json에 이 내용을 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"appsec-toolbox": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"-i",
"--rm",
"-e",
"APPSEC_LANGS",
"ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"
],
"env": {
"APPSEC_LANGS": "your-value"
}
}
}
}터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요
claude mcp add appsec-toolbox --env APPSEC_LANGS=your-value -- docker run -i --rm -e APPSEC_LANGS ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0실행하기 전에 빈 값을 채워 주세요.
프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"appsec-toolbox": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"-i",
"--rm",
"-e",
"APPSEC_LANGS",
"ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"
],
"env": {
"APPSEC_LANGS": "your-value"
}
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"servers": {
"appsec-toolbox": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"-i",
"--rm",
"-e",
"APPSEC_LANGS",
"ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"
],
"env": {
"APPSEC_LANGS": "your-value"
}
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
이 서버는 내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는데, ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요. 다른 앱을 고르세요.
선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.
APPSEC_LANGS env이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 설치하면 AI 앱에 도구 목록이 나타나요.
누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 8일 점검
레지스트리 이름이 GitHub 계정 ai-ronin-systems 기준으로 확인되었고, 이 계정이 저장소를 소유하고 있어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는 서버라 인터넷 엔드포인트가 없어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되며, 대신 로컬 설정을 사용해요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 도구 목록은 인터넷 엔드포인트가 있는 서버에서만 읽을 수 있어요
레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.
해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.
레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. AI 앱이 필요할 때 실행하고, 데이터는 제작자의 서버를 거치지 않아요(서버 자체가 온라인 서비스를 호출하는 경우는 제외).
GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(0.3.0)은 13일 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. 내 컴퓨터에 Docker도 있어야 해요.
같은 카테고리에는: GitHub, Desktop Commander, Cloudflare MCP
같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.
카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management
Cloudflare MCP servers
제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.
Let an AI agent audit code you do not trust, without giving it a shell, a path to choose, or the repository's code to run.
Ten pinned security scanners behind eight parameterless MCP tools, in one hardened container. The audited repository is treated as the attacker. The agent only ever collects evidence.
*Recorded from examples/agent_demo.py against examples/vulnerable-sample. Waiting time is shortened; the real scan time is in the last line.*
security.sast, security.secrets, security.dependencies, and so on.Each claim links to the code or test that proves it.
| Problem | Approach | Proof | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A prompt-injected agent with a shell can do anything. | The agent's whole surface is eight parameterless tasks, governed by Makefile MCP. Maintenance targets exist but are refused. | .makefile-mcp.yaml, the demo | |||
Scanning untrusted code usually runs it: setup.py, postinstall, Gradle plugins, Go toolchain downloads, scanner plug-ins. | Strictly passive analysis: no build, install, or dependency resolution; Go runs with GOPROXY=off and GOTOOLCHAIN=local. An adversarial review found that a planted .checkov.yaml could make Checkov import the repository's Python; that path is closed and regression-tested. | examples/hostile-sample, tests/image.sh | |||
A hostile repository can silence its own findings with .semgrepignore, .gitleaksignore, # nosec, # nosemgrep... | Every scanner runs on toolbox-owned configuration. Inline suppressions are disabled where the scanner allows it, and every marker found is inventoried for the reviewer either way. | settings table, output/suppressions.json | |||
| Evidence is only worth something if it is tied to what was scanned. | The manifest fingerprints the tree exactly like `find . -type f -print0 \ | LC_ALL=C sort -z \ | xargs -0 sha256sum \ | sha256sum, including file names that are not UTF-8 or that sha256sum` escapes, and records each report's digest, tool versions, and data sources. | scripts/write-manifest.py, tests/unit/test_manifest.py |
| One malformed file should not let the target stop the audit. | Input a scanner cannot read because of the target (an unloadable Go package, a corrupt lockfile) becomes a recorded coverage limit: not a failed bundle, and not a fake clean result. | scripts/run-language-profiles.py, scripts/run-osv.sh | |||
| Results should be reproducible, and a compromised scanner should have nowhere to send the code. | Offline mode: fetch rule and advisory data once, then scan under --network none. The manifest records the data's age and digest. | Offline mode | |||
| A security tool is a supply-chain target. | Every downloaded binary is checked against its published SHA-256 per architecture; the base image is pinned by digest; Actions are pinned by commit; release jobs that run project code hold no write token; images carry signed build provenance. | Dockerfile, release.yml |
Verification in layers. Unit tests cover the scripts. A smoke test drives the Makefile through Makefile MCP with fake scanners whose stubs fail if any hardening flag is missing. The image test runs the real scanners against a known-vulnerable sample, a hostile sample that tries every attack above, and offline mode, under the documented resource limits. Independent adversarial reviews attacked the image; every confirmed finding was fixed with a regression test, and what remains is written down in the threat model.
IMAGE=ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0
docker pull "$IMAGE" gh attestation verify "oci://$IMAGE" --owner ai-ronin-systems
Offline mode, the resource limits, and the target-settings hardening are on main and ship in the next release. To use them now: docker build -t appsec-toolbox-mcp:dev . and IMAGE=appsec-toolbox-mcp:dev.
Run it as an MCP stdio server against one repository:
docker run --rm -i \
--read-only --cap-drop=ALL --security-opt=no-new-privileges:true \ --tmpfs /tmp:rw,nosuid,nodev,size=3g --memory=6g --pids-limit=512 \ --user "$(id -u):$(id -g)" \ -v "$PWD/my-project:/runner/target:ro" \ -v "$PWD/appsec-output:/runner/output:rw" \ "$IMAGE"
Register the same command as a stdio server in any MCP client:
{
"mcpServers": { "appsec-toolbox": { "command": "docker", "args": ["run", "--rm", "-i", "--read-only", "--cap-drop=ALL", "--security-opt=no-new-privileges:true", "--tmpfs", "/tmp:rw,nosuid,nodev,size=3g", "--memory=6g", "--pids-limit=512", "-v", "/abs/path/my-project:/runner/target:ro", "-v", "/abs/path/appsec-output:/runner/output:rw", "ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"] } } }
Compose, offline mode, language selection, and every evidence file are in Usage.
untrusted repository (read-only)
| v /runner/target | v trusted Makefile + Makefile MCP | | | | | | Semgrep Gitleaks OSV Trivy Checkov Syft | +---- language profile selection ----+ | | | | Bandit FindSecBugs njsscan gosec Python Java Node/JS Go | v /runner/output reports, run-manifest.json, suppressions.json, audit log
The operator mounts exactly one repository at /runner/target and one writable directory at /runner/output. The audited path is never an MCP parameter, so the agent has no host-path capability. A trusted Makefile holds every scanner command; Makefile MCP decides which of its targets the agent may call. Language specialists are picked by detection (APPSEC_LANGS=auto) or by the operator, never by the agent.
| Capability | Tool | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
security.audit | everything below | complete bundle |
security.sast | Semgrep + suppression inventory | semgrep.json, suppressions.json |
security.secrets | Gitleaks | gitleaks.json |
security.dependencies | OSV-Scanner | osv.json |
security.repository | Trivy | trivy.json |
security.iac | Checkov | checkov.json |
security.language | Bandit, FindSecBugs, njsscan, gosec as applicable | language-profile.json + reports |
supply_chain.sbom | Syft | sbom.cdx.json (CycloneDX) |
The audited repository is the attacker, and the agent reading its reports may be steered by it. Read the [threat model](docs/threat-model.md): attacker goals, sixteen threats with their controls and residual risks, what is and is not guaranteed, and an operator checklist.
| Protected | Not protected |
|---|---|
| Target builds, installs, hooks, and Makefiles never run. | Scanner parser bugs; the container is the boundary. |
| Target-owned scanner settings files cannot suppress findings or load code. | Inline trivy:ignore and njsscan-ignore comments; Checkov lists its inline skips as skipped_checks. All are inventoried. |
| The agent cannot pick the target or run anything but the eight scans. | An agent that misreports what the reports say. |
| No credentials in the container; read-only, unprivileged, non-root, resource-capped. | Exfiltration by a compromised scanner in online mode. Offline mode runs with no network. |
| Each run's manifest ties report digests to a fingerprint of the scanned tree. | Tampering by anyone who can write output/; the manifest is not signed. |
It is not an autonomous auditor, an LLM agent, a DAST engine, a credential manager, a report normalizer, or a shell server.
appsec-audit-hound (planned) decides why to scan, correlates evidence, writes findings
| MCP appsec-toolbox-mcp collects governed, passive evidence <- this repository | built on makefile-mcp exposes trusted Make targets to agents, deny-by-default
Makefile MCP is published on PyPI and the official MCP Registry, with its own threat model.
| Document | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Threat model | Attacker goals, threats and controls, guarantees, limits, operator checklist |
| Usage | Running, tools and evidence files, language profiles, offline mode, scanner behaviour, network use, versions, development |
| Architecture | Trust boundary, ownership, design rules |
| Tooling | Pinned versions, settings each scanner ignores, update policy |
| Security policy | Supported versions and private vulnerability reporting |
| Changelog | Released and unreleased changes |
| Contributing | How to add a scanner without widening the boundary |
pipx install pytest==8.4.2 && pipx install ruff==0.14.0
make test # ruff, unit tests, smoke test make image make test-image # the real image: known positives, hostile sample, offline mode
More in Usage.
Apache-2.0.