Context7
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)
Persistent, verified memory for AI coding agents: recall, capture, guardrails, review queue.
이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.
이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.
쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.
AIDIMAG_REPO, AIDIMAG_LLM, OPENAI_API_KEY비밀로 표시된 값은 내 계정의 열쇠예요. 절대 다른 사람과 공유하거나 채팅에 붙여 넣지 마세요.
필요한 것
어떤 앱을 쓰세요?
위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config를 열고 claude_desktop_config.json에 이 내용을 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"aidimag": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"aidimag",
"mcp"
],
"env": {
"AIDIMAG_REPO": "your-value",
"AIDIMAG_LLM": "your-value",
"OPENAI_API_KEY": "your-value"
}
}
}
}터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요
claude mcp add aidimag --env AIDIMAG_REPO=your-value --env AIDIMAG_LLM=your-value --env OPENAI_API_KEY=your-value -- npx -y aidimag mcp실행하기 전에 빈 값을 채워 주세요.
프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"aidimag": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"aidimag",
"mcp"
],
"env": {
"AIDIMAG_REPO": "your-value",
"AIDIMAG_LLM": "your-value",
"OPENAI_API_KEY": "your-value"
}
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"servers": {
"aidimag": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"aidimag",
"mcp"
],
"env": {
"AIDIMAG_REPO": "your-value",
"AIDIMAG_LLM": "your-value",
"OPENAI_API_KEY": "your-value"
}
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
이 서버는 내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는데, ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요. 다른 앱을 고르세요.
선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.
AIDIMAG_REPO envAIDIMAG_LLM env이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 설치하면 AI 앱에 도구 목록이 나타나요.
누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 6일 점검
레지스트리 이름이 GitHub 계정 AiDimag 기준으로 확인되었고, 이 계정이 저장소를 소유하고 있어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는 서버라 인터넷 엔드포인트가 없어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되며, 대신 로컬 설정을 사용해요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 도구 목록은 인터넷 엔드포인트가 있는 서버에서만 읽을 수 있어요
레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.
해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.
입력해야 할 값: OPENAI_API_KEY
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. AI 앱이 필요할 때 실행하고, 데이터는 제작자의 서버를 거치지 않아요(서버 자체가 온라인 서비스를 호출하는 경우는 제외).
GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(1.0.22)은 3개월 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. 내 컴퓨터에 Node.js도 있어야 해요.
같은 카테고리에는: Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.
카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.
Your coding agent forgets your codebase. AIDimag doesn't.
Documentation • Why AIDimag? • Getting Started • Use Cases • Benchmarks • AI Dimag Cloud • Pricing
AI Dimag is a memory system for software engineering — not a general-purpose "AI memory" app. It gives any MCP-compatible agent (Claude, Cursor, Copilot, Windsurf…) a persistent memory of your codebase that survives across sessions — decisions, conventions, gotchas, failed approaches, guardrails, and reusable skills — stored as falsifiable claims with grounding evidence in .aidimag/ next to your code.
The subject of memory is your repository, not your preferences or chat history. Every capability — evidence, git-hook verification, guardrails, pre-commit checks, path-scoped recall, session scratchpad — exists to serve day-to-day development work.
Most memory systems store text and retrieve whatever is similar later — a stored fact is assumed true forever. That's dangerous in a codebase, where a confidently-retrieved stale fact is *worse* than no memory at all.
Every AI Dimag memory carries evidence (a shell check, an anchored commit, a test) that dim verify re-runs against the current repo — automatically, via git hooks, on every pull, checkout, and rebase. Beliefs that stop being true go STALE instead of silently misleading your AI.
.cursorrules, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.)npm install -g aidimag
Requires Node 22+. Ships two equivalent binaries: dim (short) and aidimag.
cd your-repo
dim init # creates .aidimag/, installs additive git hooks dim bootstrap # optional: LLM-survey the repo into a starter memory set dim review # approve what enters memory (nothing is stored unreviewed)
dim remember "All DB access goes through src/db/store.ts" -k INVARIANT -p src \ -e "STATIC_CHECK:! grep -rl better-sqlite3 src --include=*.ts | grep -v store.ts" dim recall db access dim verify # re-run all evidence; stale beliefs get flagged dim brief # session-start briefing: in-scope memory, guardrails, gaps
dim generate-context --format all --auto # creates .cursorrules, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.
dim setup --yes # init + git hooks + MCP configs for detected agents + context files
dim setup-ollama # install Ollama + pull a free local embedding model for semantic search dim doctor # verify everything is wired correctly
Add to your agent config (e.g. .mcp.json for Claude Code):
{
"mcpServers": { "aidimag": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "aidimag", "mcp"], "env": { "AIDIMAG_REPO": "/path/to/your/repo" } } } }
MCP Tools get memory_search, memory_propose, context_note (live in-chat fact capture), chat_harvest (live, tool-agnostic session harvesting with server-side secret redaction), memory_critique (a second critic grounded in verified memory), session-start briefings, session-end extraction, and more.
Non-MCP Tools: dim generate-context -f all renders verified memory into .cursorrules, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, .windsurfrules, and .github/copilot-instructions.md (--auto keeps them refreshed).
Hermes Agent: dim hermes install registers aidimag as a native Hermes memory provider — one command, no pip, no venv. A single stdlib-only Python bridge delegates to the MCP server: session briefings are injected into the system prompt, recall is prefetched per turn, and session learnings become review-queue *proposals* (never silent writes). Then: hermes config set memory.provider aidimag.
Commits, PRs, AI-chat transcripts (Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Cursor), and pasted docs are mined into *proposals*. Nothing enters memory until you approve it in dim review (auto-triaged best-first, approve all --min-score 0.7 for batches).
STATIC_CHECK / COMMIT_REF / TEST_RESULT / EXEC_TRACE / HUMAN_ATTESTED evidence. Failing evidence flips memories to STALE and auto-drafts a recovery proposal. Confidence decays without re-confirmation.
Shell-command evidence that arrives via team sync is never executed until you inspect and approve it (dim verify --trust).
FTS5 keyword + vector KNN (OpenAI, local Ollama, or AWS Bedrock; auto-detected except Bedrock, which is explicit opt-in; works keyword-only with none).
Behavioral rules (never / ask-first / always) and step-by-step procedures, enforced by dim check (pre-commit) and memory_critique.
dim serve + dim sync: local-first replicas, device-code login, brain-scoped API keys, hashed credentials, cross-machine verification consensus.
Drop design docs / ADRs / PDFs / DOCX into knowledge/ and they're summarized into reviewed, pinned memories.
dim scratch (and the scratchpad_* MCP tools) hold short-term session notes — TTL-expiring, never synced, never durable memory. dim audit lists memories resting on the weakest ground (agent-authored, evidence-free, stale, or long-unverified) so you can fix them up like a dependency audit for your repo's knowledge.
dim ui — run checks, session briefings, bootstrap, harvest, and context generation from the browser — plus VS Code and IntelliJ extensions.
Commits tell you *what* changed; tickets hold the *why*. aiDimag connects to your ticketing system so that context flows into your memory — ticket titles, types, and statuses appear next to mined proposals during dim review, and agents can fetch tickets via the ticket_get MCP tool.
Jira, GitHub Issues, Linear, GitLab Issues, Azure DevOps, ClickUp, Shortcut, YouTrack, Asana, Trello, Notion, Pivotal Tracker, a custom HTTP middleware, or Remote (team sync server — zero local credentials).
# Connect a provider (interactive)
dim ticket connect
dim ticket status
dim ticket show XXX-2100
dim ticket share
Ticket credentials are stored per-repo in .aidimag/config.json under tickets.token (with file mode 0o600), matching the same pattern as cloud sync tokens. Credentials never leak between projects. You can also set the AIDIMAG_TICKET_TOKEN environment variable, which takes precedence over the config file.
One admin shares their ticket credential via the sync server (dim ticket share). Team members select "Remote (team sync server)" as their provider — they resolve tickets through the server and hold zero ticket credentials locally. When a cloud server is linked, the dashboard auto-discovers the team's ticket provider and shows a "Connect now" button.
Define a branch-naming convention and have aiDimag warn or block on violations:
dim ticket branch-rule # manage the convention
dim branch XXX-2100 # create a conforming branch (fetches title for slug)
| Enforcement | Effect |
|---|---|
off | No checking |
warn | Heads-up at branch creation (post-checkout) |
push | Blocks pushing non-conforming branches (pre-push) |
Full guide: [Connecting tickets](https://aidimag.com/guides/tickets)
AI Dimag follows a claim-and-verify model; other memory systems follow store-and-retrieve. The short version:
| Conversational memory layers | Vector-store memory plugins | Hand-maintained context files | AI Dimag | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Built for | Chat assistants remembering *users* | General recall over embedded text | Static instructions for coding agents | Coding agents in a living repo |
| Unit of memory | Extracted facts / chat summaries | Embedded text chunks | Prose | Falsifiable, typed claims with evidence |
| How memory gets in | Automatic capture | Automatic embedding | Manual edits | Human-gated review queue |
| When the code changes | Nothing — stored facts stay "true" | Nothing | File silently rots | Evidence re-runs via git hooks; broken claims flip STALE |
| Trust model | Write-time label, never re-checked | Similarity ≈ trust | "It's in the file" | Verification status + decaying confidence; trust-ranked retrieval |
| Enforcement | None — injection only | None | Hope the model reads it | Guardrails + pre-commit `dim check` + `memory_critique` |
| Failure mode | Confidently recalls outdated facts | Retrieves similar, true or not | Instructions drift from reality | Says "this went STALE" instead of guessing |
Full comparison: [aidimag.com/comparison](https://aidimag.com/comparison)
How aiDimag relates to the memory tools people usually ask about. These solve a different problem (remembering *users and conversations*); aiDimag remembers your *repository* and proves its memories are still true:
| aiDimag | Mnemosyne | mem0 | Letta | Honcho | SuperMemory | Hindsight | ChromaDB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject of memory | Your codebase | Chat/agent sessions | User & agent facts | Agent's own context | User/peer reasoning | Personal + agent | Agent memory | — (vector DB) |
| Local-first | ✅ SQLite per repo | ✅ SQLite | ⚠️
앞부분만 보여 드려요. 나머지는 저장소에서 읽어 보세요