Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)
AI integrity standards, benchmarks, and EU AI Act-aligned Tier 0 model certification
이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.
이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.
쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.
필요한 것
어떤 앱을 쓰세요?
위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.
웹, 데스크톱, 모바일의 Claude에서 쓸 수 있어요:
https://aioq.org/mcp터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요
claude mcp add --transport http aio https://aioq.org/mcp프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"aio": {
"url": "https://aioq.org/mcp"
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"servers": {
"aio": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://aioq.org/mcp"
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요:
https://aioq.org/mcp메뉴 이름은 요금제나 시기에 따라 조금 다를 수 있어요.
선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.
이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.
아직 이 서버의 도구 목록을 읽지 않았어요. 엔드포인트는 차례대로 돌아가며 점검해요.
누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 6일 점검
게시자(aioq.org)가 저장소 소유자(AI-Integrity)가 아니에요. 다른 사람이 등록했을 수 있어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트는 차례대로 돌아가며 점검해요
아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트는 차례대로 돌아가며 점검해요
아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트를 점검할 때 도구 목록을 읽어요
레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.
해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 0개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.
레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.
제작자의 클라우드에서 실행돼요. 설치 없이 인터넷으로 연결하지만, 보내는 내용은 제작자의 서버를 거쳐요.
GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(0.2.0)은 3개월 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. URL로 연결되기 때문에, 원격 MCP 서버를 지원하는 앱(예: 개발자 모드의 ChatGPT)에서도 쓸 수 있어요.
같은 카테고리에는: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, yontu
같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.
카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Türkçe yazı denetimi: TDK kuralları, yapay zekâ izleri, metin türüne göre üslup.
제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.
Machine-readable mirror of the open standards published by AIO — AI Integrity Organization, an international standards body established as a Swiss association in Geneva (UID CHE-469.997.903).
Everything here is also served live from https://aioq.org. This repository exists so the same files can be read, diffed, cited, and vendored without depending on an HTTP endpoint staying up.
License: [CC BY 4.0](LICENSE). Attribution string: AIO — AI Integrity Organization, https://aioq.org, CC BY 4.0
AI integrity, in AIO's framing, has three distinct failure modes, and AIO works on the first:
The AIO Framework encodes one judgment as one line:
C:MED/IXi | V:Bec<Sda | E:Exp<Gui | S:Usr<Pro
Context, then the value (V), evidence (E), and source (S) hierarchies behind that judgment, where < reads "outranked by". No user content is carried — the line records *why*, not *what*.
| Path | What it is |
|---|---|
vocabulary/aio-00011.json | The AIO 00011 common vocabulary: 39 V/E/S codes, the context axes, and the AIO 20002 record grammar with its JSON Schema. Snapshot of GET https://aioq.org/api/framework/vocabulary. |
standards-packs/*.json (×15 + EU) | Waves 1-3 formalization drafts (draft-unverified — single-pass seed, dual verification pending): NIST AI RMF, the Korean AI Framework Act (current consolidation 법률 제21311호), the CoE Framework Convention (not yet in force — EU sole ratification), the China Generative AI Interim Measures, the EU GPAI Code of Practice, the OECD AI Principles (2024 consolidation), California TFAIA (SB 53), the China AI-content labeling Measures, the G7 Hiroshima Code of Conduct, and the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI (license-constrained: short-quote footprint only). Each entry carries verbatim, machine-checked provenance quotes. |
standards-packs/eu-ai-act-v0.2.json | The AIO formalization of the EU AI Act: per-provision V/E/S mapping, each entry carrying a verbatim quote from the official text, a rationale, a retrieval date, and its own verification status. |
standards-packs/schema.json | JSON Schema for a standards pack. A new norm is a data file, not code. |
standards-packs/FORMALIZATION_METHODOLOGY.md | How a legal text becomes a pack, and what the status ladder means. |
item-banks/eu-ai-act.public.json | The Tier 0 public item bank — 12 items, including their expected answers. See the note below; this is deliberate. |
item-banks/agent-track-v0.public.json | The agent-submitted benchmark track item bank v0.2 — 315 forced-choice dilemmas (105 per layer: L2 sources, L3 evidence, L4 values). There is no answer key by design: each item is a forced choice between two variables, and the measurement is the choice distribution itself. The review block records the six-round quality review that produced v0.2; one item carries an explicit reviewNote. |
item-banks/eu-ai-act.gateb-commitment.json | Commitment hashes for the private Tier 0 Gate B item pool (96 items): per-item sha256 plus an Ed25519-signed snapshot hash. The items themselves are private by design (seeded-random serving); this file lets anyone verify post hoc that served items existed before their test. Retired items are disclosed at /content/bench-items/eu-ai-act.gateb-retired.json on aioq.org as the pool rotates. |
verify/verify-certificate.mjs | Standalone Ed25519 verifier for an issued certificate. No npm dependencies. |
Tier 0 is self-assessment on a fully public item set. Publishing the expected hierarchies is not a leak — it is the design. A Tier 0 score is a floor, not a gaming-resistant measurement: it records that a model *could* answer by the criteria it declared. Hiding the key would buy a false sense of rigour while making the measurement unreproducible by anyone but AIO. Gaming resistance is what higher, proctored tiers with private item banks are for.
The live API serves the same bank with the answer key stripped, so that a submission flow cannot trivially read it back: GET https://aioq.org/api/eval/items?pack=eu-ai-act.
A standards pack is AIO's own formalization of an external reference norm — a reading of a legal text expressed in the AIO vocabulary, so that it can be measured. It is not the norm, not an official reading of it, and not produced with the involvement of the body that issued it.
Every pack carries a status on a fixed ladder:
draft-unverified → draft-verified → rfc → active
The EU AI Act pack is currently draft-verified: every mapping entry has a verbatim quote from the official text and a recorded retrieval date, but the pack has not yet been through the public RFC process. Certificates issued on a pack that is not active carry that fact — the field basisStatus sits inside the signed payload, so it cannot be reconstructed after the fact.
Certificates issued by AIO are signed with Ed25519. The public key is published at https://aioq.org/.well-known/aio-cert-key.json, so verification never requires trusting — or even reaching — an AIO server beyond fetching the record itself.
node verify/verify-certificate.mjs AIO-C0-XXXXXXXX
node verify/verify-certificate.mjs AIO-C0-XXXXXXXX --json node verify/verify-certificate.mjs --file ./saved-response.json --key ./pinned-key.json
Exit codes: 0 verified and currently valid · 1 verified but expired or revoked · 2 signature missing or mismatched · 3 usage or network error.
The one rule that matters: take verification.canonicalPayload from the API response verbatim as the signed message. Do not re-serialize it. It is already canonical — signed fields only, keys sorted by code point, no whitespace — and re-serializing it is the usual cause of a false negative. The script also rebuilds that payload from the certificate's own fields and compares, which catches a server that shows you one thing and signs another.
A verified signature proves only that AIO issued that exact record. It says nothing about whether the model is safe to deploy.
No authentication, CORS open, JSON, all CC BY 4.0.
| Endpoint | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| https://aioq.org/api/openapi.json | OpenAPI 3.1 description of everything below | ||
GET /api/framework/vocabulary | the vocabulary in this repo, live · `?layer=V\ | E\ | S · ?format=schema` |
GET /api/standards-packs · /{id} | packs with their full per-provision mapping | ||
GET /api/eval/items?pack=eu-ai-act | Tier 0 items, answer key stripped, plus the scoring methodology | ||
POST /api/eval/submit | submit answers; deterministic scoring, signed certificate on a pass | ||
GET /api/certifications/registry | every certificate issued | ||
GET /api/certifications/{certId} | one certificate, with its signature check and offline instructions | ||
GET /api/certifications/{certId}/badge.svg | badge, drawn live so it cannot outlive its own truth | ||
GET /api/benchmarks/agent-track/items | the agent-track item bank in this repo, live · `?layer=L2\ | L3\ | L4` |
POST /api/benchmarks/agent-track/submit | submit a run (requires an agent key with the bench:submit scope) | ||
GET /.well-known/aio-cert-key.json | Ed25519 public keys | ||
GET /.well-known/mcp/server.json | MCP server metadata |
MCP server — https://aioq.org/mcp, Streamable HTTP, protocol 2025-06-18, stateless, no auth.
{ "mcpServers": { "aio": { "type": "http", "url": "https://aioq.org/mcp" } } }
13 tools: search_atlas, list_papers, get_paper, get_benchmark_distribution, get_framework_vocabulary, list_standards_packs, get_standards_pack, register_for_certification, get_eval_items, submit_eval, verify_certification, get_bench_items, submit_bench_run.
Index for crawlers and agents: https://aioq.org/llms.txt
| Repository | |
|---|---|
AI-Integrity/AIO20002 | The full specification of AIO 20002, the reasoning record standard — prose spec, examples, tests. The machine-readable grammar in vocabulary/aio-00011.json here implements it. |
AI-Integrity/aio-prism-benchmark | The PRISM benchmark — multi-layer win-rate rankings across frontier models. |
Naming convention: AIO repositories hold the specification of a single numbered standard; kebab-case repositories hold data, tools, and benchmarks.
Errors in a standard, a mapping, or a benchmark result are handled through the public RFC process, not private correction: https://aioq.org/en/rfc. That is the point of publishing the provenance alongside every mapping entry — a disagreement should be arguable against a quote and a date, not against an assertion.
Issues and pull requests here are welcome for the mirror itself (broken files, stale snapshots, verifier bugs). Substantive changes to a standard go through the RFC process.
AIO certifies conformance to AIO's own formalization of a reference norm. A certificate is not an endorsement by the body that issued that norm (the European Union does not endorse, review, or participate in the EU AI Act pack), is not a legal conformity assessment, and creates no presumption of conformity under any regulation.
Contact: info@aioq.org · Site: https://aioq.org