Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)
235 quant tools and 399 strategy sleeves, checked against QuantLib, statsmodels, arch or TA-Lib.
이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.
이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.
쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.
CANLI_TOOLSETS필요한 것
어떤 앱을 쓰세요?
위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config를 열고 claude_desktop_config.json에 이 내용을 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"canli-quant": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"canli-quant-mcp"
],
"env": {
"CANLI_TOOLSETS": "your-value"
}
}
}
}터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요
claude mcp add canli-quant --env CANLI_TOOLSETS=your-value -- npx -y canli-quant-mcp실행하기 전에 빈 값을 채워 주세요.
프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"canli-quant": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"canli-quant-mcp"
],
"env": {
"CANLI_TOOLSETS": "your-value"
}
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"servers": {
"canli-quant": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"canli-quant-mcp"
],
"env": {
"CANLI_TOOLSETS": "your-value"
}
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
이 서버는 내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는데, ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요. 다른 앱을 고르세요.
선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.
CANLI_TOOLSETS env이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 설치하면 AI 앱에 도구 목록이 나타나요.
누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 8일 점검
레지스트리 이름이 GitHub 계정 arhancanli 기준으로 확인되었고, 이 계정이 저장소를 소유하고 있어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는 서버라 인터넷 엔드포인트가 없어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되며, 대신 로컬 설정을 사용해요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 도구 목록은 인터넷 엔드포인트가 있는 서버에서만 읽을 수 있어요
레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.
해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.
레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. AI 앱이 필요할 때 실행하고, 데이터는 제작자의 서버를 거치지 않아요(서버 자체가 온라인 서비스를 호출하는 경우는 제외).
GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(0.3.0)은 3일 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. 내 컴퓨터에 Node.js도 있어야 해요.
같은 카테고리에는: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Funooy Krillion Reference
같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.
카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Funooy trivia references in six languages, with rules and fixed scoring. No daily spoilers.
제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.
236 quant finance tools in one MCP server: performance and risk, options and exotics, fixed income, portfolio construction, econometrics, technical indicators, execution, sizing, crypto and FX, valuation, strategy backtests, a library of 399 strategy sleeves, data checks, and data annotation and ML labeling. Every tool computes on the data you send, and every tool's results are checked in the test suite against an independent implementation (QuantLib, statsmodels, arch, TA-Lib, numpy-financial, scikit-learn, empyrical, scipy, pandas, dcor): 465 reference cases, plus planted-defect tests for the data checks.
Local stdio, no key, no account, no network calls: your data never leaves your machine (see Privacy, enforced by tests).
Computed NaN and Infinity values are refused with a tool error naming the affected fields. They do not become unexplained nulls or receive a success receipt. Check the input scale and the calculation's domain. Ordinary finite answers and null warm-up positions are preserved.
[canli-quant-mcp on canlicapital.com](https://canlicapital.com/mcp-servers/quant) · All Canli Capital MCP servers. Free, MIT-licensed. For every server behind one install, use canli-mcp.
Listing 238 tools directly costs 83,944 tokens of context (o200k) on every request. By default this server lists three, 680 tokens:
| tool | what it does |
|---|---|
find_tool | Search the catalog in plain words ("cornish fisher var", "barrier option", "kpss"). |
describe_tool | One tool's description and exact input schema. |
run_tool | Run any tool by name. receipt: true adds a calculation receipt. |
find_tool ranks with BM25 over each tool's name, title, keywords and description, with stemming and finance abbreviations (cvar, npv, irr, ytm...). On 110 test requests it returns the right tool first 94% of the time and in the top three 99% (test/search.test.mjs), so a model rarely needs a second search. run_tool takes digits (3-10 significant figures; default 10) to cut output tokens when full precision is not needed: 9-19% fewer tokens at 4-6 digits on the results we measured.
Measured on an Apple-silicon laptop (Node 24): connect and initialize 140 ms; a typical tool call 0.26 ms median over stdio; find_tool 1 ms; a full 399-sleeve tournament on 1,200 days of six assets about 2 s.
The tool list is byte-identical across launches, so providers can cache it. To list toolsets directly instead, set CANLI_TOOLSETS to a comma-separated list (e.g. performance,options, 8,053 tokens for performance alone) or all.
npx -y canli-quant-mcp
Claude Code:
claude mcp add canli-quant -- npx -y canli-quant-mcp
Claude Desktop, Cursor or any MCP client:
{ "mcpServers": { "canli-quant": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "canli-quant-mcp"] } } }
Then ask, for example:
| toolset | tools | checked against |
|---|---|---|
performance | 23 | numpy, scipy, statsmodels and empyrical-reloaded |
options | 12 | QuantLib (analytic engines; finite differences for American options); an independent implementation of the CBOE VIX method; the lognormal density for Breeden-Litzenberger |
indicators | 30 | TA-Lib's C library, bar for bar; pandas for indicators TA-Lib lacks |
econometrics | 27 | statsmodels (OLS, HAC, ADF, KPSS, Engle-Granger and Johansen cointegration, Granger, ARCH LM, Markov switching, recursive least squares and CUSUM), arch (GARCH, variance ratio), scipy and dcor (rank and distance correlation) |
exotics | 9 | QuantLib (barrier, Asian, Heston, SABR, Kirk, Margrabe, lookback and chooser engines) |
rates | 15 | QuantLib bonds and short-rate models; numpy and scipy for curves and swaps; scipy fsolve for Merton |
risk | 7 | numpy and scipy re-derivations; scipy's generalized Pareto likelihood for EVT |
returns | 4 | pandas resampling and closed forms |
portfolio | 15 | numpy closed forms, scipy SLSQP, scikit-learn Ledoit-Wolf, the HRP paper's code |
execution | 7 | closed forms (Almgren-Chriss kappa solved numerically), statsmodels OLS |
sizing | 7 | scipy and closed forms |
crypto_fx | 9 | closed forms and simulated pool reserves |
strategies | 20 | an independent pandas implementation of every recipe and of the costed engine |
sleeves | 8 | an independent numpy and pandas port of every recipe and the engine; arch's Reality Check and an independent re-studentized SPA and StepM on the same bootstrap draws; scipy average linkage; numpy CSCV; plus no-lookahead and warm-up checks on every sleeve |
data_checks | 10 | planted-defect tests: each check must find what was planted and stay quiet on clean data |
labeling | 7 | pandas ports of the snippets in Advances in Financial Machine Learning (ewm volatility, CUSUM filter, triple barrier, uniqueness, purged k-fold) and statsmodels OLS t-values |
tvm | 15 | numpy-financial and closed forms |
valuation | 10 | published formulas re-derived independently |
Prompts chain the tools for common jobs: analyze_strategy, audit_backtest, value_company, price_option, test_mean_reversion, build_portfolio, analyze_trade_log, sleeve_tournament, build_sleeve_book, label_dataset, check_dataset.
Resources: canli-quant://catalog (every tool), canli-quant://methods (what each toolset is checked against), canli-quant://tools/{name} (one tool's schema), canli-quant://sleeves (the sleeve library), canli-quant://sleeves/{id} (one sleeve's spec) and canli-quant://privacy.
399 strategy sleeves in 18 families, each a published idea with its usual parameters swept on a plain grid: moving-average crossovers, time-series momentum, multi-horizon trend, channel breakouts, MACD, z-score and RSI reversion, volatility targeting, cross-sectional momentum, dual momentum, risk parity, equal weight, minimum variance, low volatility, short-term reversal, trend-filtered allocation, 52-week-high momentum and pairs. Every sleeve has a fixed rule, a stated warm-up, references, known risks and a SHA-256 of its spec. None was picked because it backtested well: they are definitions, not track records.
Running many strategies and keeping the best is how backtests overfit, so the tools that run many sleeves at once correct for it:
| tool | what it answers |
|---|---|
sleeve_tournament | Which sleeves lead on your prices, and does the best survive the deflated Sharpe ratio (counting all sleeves and the effective number of independent ones), White's Reality Check, Hansen's SPA test and Romano-Wolf StepM (re-studentized in every resample) and the probability of backtest overfitting (CSCV)? |
sleeve_walk_forward | If you had kept picking the top sleeves by trailing Sharpe, what would you have earned out of sample, and how much of their in-sample Sharpe was luck? |
sleeve_clusters | How many genuinely different bets do the sleeves make on this data? |
sleeve_regime_map | Which sleeves held up in calm, turbulent, rising and falling markets? |
combine_sleeves | What does a book of chosen sleeves look like, and what asset weights does it want as of the latest close? |
The tests check that no sleeve looks ahead (rewriting future prices never changes an earlier target), that none trades before its warm-up, and that the tournament's statistics match arch's Reality Check and an independent re-studentized SPA and StepM on the same bootstrap draws, scipy's clustering and an independent numpy CSCV. run_sleeve and combine_sleeves return target_weights by symbol, which a paper broker such as canli-paper-trading-mcp can rebalance to.
The labeling toolset annotates your own data and turns it into training labels without leakage:
| tool | what it does |
|---|---|
annotate_price_series | Tags every period: outlier moves, stale prices, drawdown episodes, new highs, causal volatility regime. |
cusum_filter_events | Picks the periods worth labeling (CUSUM filter on log prices). |
triple_barrier_labels | Labels by which of a volatility-scaled profit-take, stop-loss or time limit is hit first; with a side, meta-labels. |
fixed_horizon_labels | Labels by the forward return over a horizon, with a fixed or volatility-scaled dead zone. |
trend_scanning_labels | Labels by the strongest forward trend's t-statistic. |
sample_weights | Uniqueness, return-attribution and time-decay weights for overlapping labels. |
purged_cv_splits | K-fold splits that purge overlapping labels and embargo the periods after each test fold. |
Each label says which future periods it used, so purging and embargoing are exact. The methods follow Lopez de Prado's *Advances in Financial Machine Learning*, checked against pandas ports of its code.
Your data stays on your machine. The server is a local stdio process with no network code, writes nothing to disk, logs nothing, starts no processes, and keeps arguments only for the duration of a call. test/privacy.test.mjs holds the code to that with a static scan of every source file and by running the server under Node's permission model, with reads limited to its own package and writes, child processes and workers denied. For the same lockdown in use:
npm i -g canli-quant-mcp
node --permission --allow-fs-read="$(npm root -g)/canli-quant-mcp" "$(npm root -g)/canli-quant-mcp/src/server.mjs"
canli-quant://privacy states the guarantees from inside the server. Calculation receipts carry hashes, never the data.
run_tool with receipt: true returns the SHA-256 of the tool name and arguments, the SHA-256 of the result, and the server version. Anyone can run the same tool with the same arguments on that version and compare the output hash. Results are deterministic: no clock, no network, and the only randomness is the sleeve bootstrap, drawn from a stated seed.
performance : Performance and risk (23)
| tool | what it does |
|---|---|
return_stats | Summarize a return series: periods, annualized geometric return (CAGR) and volatility, Sharpe, max drawdown, skew, excess kurtosis, best and worst period, share positive. |
sharpe_ratio | Compute the annualized Sharpe ratio with its standard error and 95% interval, under iid normal returns (Lo 2002) and allowing skew and fat tails (Mertens 2002). For the probability it beats luck across many trials, use canli-validation-mcp. |
sortino_ratio | Compute the annualized Sortino ratio: mean return above a target over downside deviation below it, with the downside deviation itself. |
| max_drawdown | Find the maximum drawdown and the worst draw
앞부분만 보여 드려요. 나머지는 저장소에서 읽어 보세요