GitHub
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)
Architecture diagram with concurrency capacity and bottleneck estimates from any codebase.
이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.
이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.
쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.
필요한 것
어떤 앱을 쓰세요?
위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config를 열고 claude_desktop_config.json에 이 내용을 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"workflow-generator": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"workflow-generator-mcp"
]
}
}
}터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요
claude mcp add workflow-generator -- uvx workflow-generator-mcp프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"workflow-generator": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"workflow-generator-mcp"
]
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"servers": {
"workflow-generator": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"workflow-generator-mcp"
]
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
이 서버는 내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는데, ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요. 다른 앱을 고르세요.
선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.
이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 설치하면 AI 앱에 도구 목록이 나타나요.
누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 6일 점검
레지스트리 이름이 GitHub 계정 askuma 기준으로 확인되었고, 이 계정이 저장소를 소유하고 있어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는 서버라 인터넷 엔드포인트가 없어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되며, 대신 로컬 설정을 사용해요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 도구 목록은 인터넷 엔드포인트가 있는 서버에서만 읽을 수 있어요
레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.
해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.
레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. AI 앱이 필요할 때 실행하고, 데이터는 제작자의 서버를 거치지 않아요(서버 자체가 온라인 서비스를 호출하는 경우는 제외).
GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(0.5.0)은 11일 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. 내 컴퓨터에 Python (uv)도 있어야 해요.
같은 카테고리에는: GitHub, Desktop Commander, Cloudflare MCP
같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.
카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management
Cloudflare MCP servers
제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.
Scan any project and generate WORKFLOW.html — a dark-mode visual system diagram showing every component, how they talk to each other, and where your throughput ceiling actually is.
Works with Python, Node.js, Go, Java, Rust, Ruby, and mixed projects. No external dependencies for the core scanner. Vendored and generated directories (node_modules, venv, site-packages, dist, …) are never scanned, and capacity figures are clearly labeled as static-analysis estimates.
[Live demo →](https://askuma.github.io/workflow-generator/) — generated from fastapi/full-stack-fastapi-template, unmodified.
*(real CLI output, unscripted — static screenshot if you'd rather not autoplay)*
Every generated page contains:
| Section | What you get |
|---|---|
| Stat row | Workers · Concurrent I/O ceiling · Semaphore limit · Rate limit · Practical throughput |
| Architecture diagram | Layered flow: external sources → gateway → API → queues → AI → storage |
| Data flow cards | Write path, read/query path, background jobs — inferred from what's detected |
| Concurrency table | Every layer: model · ceiling · limiting factor |
| Bottleneck analysis | Ranked CRITICAL → LOW with mitigation notes |
| Codebase dependency graph | Force-directed module/import graph — click a node to isolate its neighbors, hover for file details. Import-direction edges are clearly distinguished from real observed traffic (see below) |
| Guided tour | Spotlight walkthrough of every section, shown automatically the first time a report is opened; replay anytime with the ? button |
Every source file (Python, JS/TS, Go, Java, Rust, Ruby) becomes a node; every real import becomes an edge — resolved with a language-appropriate parser (Python's ast module, regex for JS/TS/Go/ Java/Rust/Ruby), not guessed. Files that match an already-detected component (an LLM call, a database client, a queue) get an edge to that component too, so you can see exactly which files talk to Redis, OpenAI, etc. Large repos (350+ files) are automatically aggregated into directory-level nodes so the graph stays readable; override with --graph-detail files or --graph-detail dirs.
Test files (tests/, test_*.py, conftest.py, *.spec.ts, *_test.go, …) get their own Test Graph section below the main one, showing which modules and services each test reaches. Fixtures and test doubles name every service they exercise, so keeping them in the main graph buries the real dependency structure under service edges.
Both sections have a Flow | Graph toggle over the same nodes and edges. Flow (the default up to 80 nodes) is a left-to-right layered diagram: columns are dependency depth from the sources (HTTP entry and files nothing imports), every detected service is its own node in the last column, and import cycles are drawn dashed. Graph is the force-directed view. Moving dots show data going both ways: a filled dot is the call/request, a hollow dot the return/response. On graphs with more than 60 edges, only the paths of the clicked or hovered node animate. Search, "hide isolated" and the selected node are shared between the two views.
The older layered Full System Architecture diagram is collapsed by default, since the Architecture Map covers the same ground.
By default the graph only shows what the *code* says (import direction, static "this file calls Redis"), which is honest but not the same as real traffic. Pass --access-log /path/to/access.log (any combined/common log format) to overlay real observed request counts onto the HTTP-entry edges — and the generated report includes a ready-to-run k6 load-test script covering up to 5 detected routes, so the "Practical throughput" number can be checked against a real measurement instead of only a static-analysis estimate.
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| API frameworks | FastAPI, Flask, Django, Express, Nest.js, Gin |
| Gateways | nginx, Caddy, Traefik (with rate limits + worker_connections) |
| LLM providers | OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Cohere, AWS Bedrock |
| Vector stores | Qdrant, Pinecone, Weaviate, ChromaDB, pgvector, FAISS, Milvus |
| Databases | PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, SQLite, Redis |
| Queues | Celery, BullMQ, Kafka, RabbitMQ, RQ, AWS SQS |
| Async primitives | asyncio.Semaphore, run_in_executor, asyncio.gather, asyncio.Lock |
| Workers | --workers N (uvicorn/gunicorn), replicas: (docker-compose), PM2 instances |
| External sources | Jira, Azure DevOps, Slack, GitHub, Stripe, Salesforce, Twilio |
| Evaluation | TruLens, RAGAS, LangSmith |
pip install workflow-generator-mcp
workflow-generator . WORKFLOW.html # CLI: scan and write the report workflow-generator-mcp # stdio MCP server
With pip installed, any MCP host config reduces to:
{
"mcpServers": { "workflow-generator": { "command": "workflow-generator-mcp" } } }
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
git clone https://github.com/askuma/workflow-generator.git ~/.claude/skills/workflow-generator
Then in any Claude Code session:
/workflow-generator
/workflow-generator /path/to/project
1. Install the dependency:
pip install mcp
2. Add to your MCP host config (replace ~ with your actual home path):
Claude Desktop
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json (Mac) %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json (Windows)
{
"mcpServers": { "workflow-generator": { "command": "python3", "args": ["~/.claude/skills/workflow-generator/mcp/server.py"] } } }
</details>
VS Code
.vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": { "workflow-generator": { "type": "stdio", "command": "python3", "args": ["~/.claude/skills/workflow-generator/mcp/server.py"] } } }
</details>
Cursor
~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": { "workflow-generator": { "command": "python3", "args": ["~/.claude/skills/workflow-generator/mcp/server.py"] } } }
</details>
Zed
.zed/settings.json
{
"context_servers": { "workflow-generator": { "command": { "path": "python3", "args": ["~/.claude/skills/workflow-generator/mcp/server.py"] } } } }
</details>
Windsurf
~/.windsurf/mcp_config.json
{
"mcpServers": { "workflow-generator": { "command": "python3", "args": ["~/.claude/skills/workflow-generator/mcp/server.py"] } } }
</details>
3. Restart your tool, then ask:
generate a workflow diagram for this project
how many concurrent requests can this handle? show me the system architecture
MCP tools exposed:
generate_workflow — scans project, writes WORKFLOW.html, optionally opens in browseranalyze_workflow — returns structured JSON summary (no file written)No install needed beyond Python 3.8+:
python3 ~/.claude/skills/workflow-generator/scripts/analyze.py . ~/WORKFLOW.html
Optional flags:
--access-log /path/to/access.log # overlay real request counts onto the dependency graph
--graph-detail auto|files|dirs # force file-level or directory-level graph nodes (default: auto)
Written: /your/project/WORKFLOW.html
Framework: FastAPI · Workers: 8 · Concurrent I/O: ~800 Practical throughput: ~50–200 req/min Bottleneck: OpenAI (LLM latency 3–30s per call) Gateway: nginx · 2 rate limit zone(s) LLM: OpenAI · eval: TruLens RAG Triad Storage: Qdrant, Redis External sources: Jira, Azure DevOps, Slack
workflow-generator/
├── SKILL.md ← Claude Code skill definition ├── INSTALL.md ← detailed per-platform install guide ├── workflow_generator_mcp/ │ ├── analyze.py ← core scanner + HTML renderer (stdlib only) │ └── server.py ← MCP stdio server (package form) ├── scripts/ │ └── analyze.py ← thin compatibility shim -> workflow_generator_mcp/analyze.py ├── tests/ ← pytest suite for the scanner ├── mcp/ │ ├── server.py ← MCP stdio server │ └── requirements.txt ← pip install mcp └── copilot/ ├── index.js ← GitHub Copilot Extension (Express) ├── package.json └── openai_function.json
MIT