프로토타입 · 미리 보기: 공식 레지스트리의 모든 서버를 담고 있으며 30분마다 동기화해요. 리뷰와 계정 기능은 다음 단계에서 열려요.
PopNx MCPAI를 쓰는 사람을 위한 MCP 서버 · 쉬운 말로 설명해요

UNITARES

제작자: cirwel버전 3.6.0i★ –i–
레지스트리 이름io.github.cirwel/unitares

설치

개요

제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)

Accountability infrastructure for long-running AI agents. Shared memory is a provenance graph.

PopNx MCP의 세 기둥

이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.

할 수 있는 일

이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.

  • 연결 방식: –
  • 전송 방식:
  • 카테고리: 검색 및 AI 기억

설치

쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.

설치하기 전에

  • 기본 점검: 1개 중 1개 통과
  • 내 컴퓨터에서 내 사용자 계정의 권한(파일, 네트워크, 앱)으로 실행돼요.
  • 레지스트리에 입력해야 할 키가 나와 있지 않아요.

제작자가 레지스트리에 설치 정보를 올리지 않았어요. 아래 제작자의 README를 확인하세요.

할 수 있는 일

내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 설치하면 AI 앱에 도구 목록이 나타나요.

기본 점검i

누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 7일 점검

  • ✓ 통과

    제작자와 저장소 일치

    레지스트리 이름이 GitHub 계정 cirwel 기준으로 확인되었고, 이 계정이 저장소를 소유하고 있어요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    계속 관리되고 있음

    아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    라이선스 있음

    아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

  • – 해당 없음

    엔드포인트 응답

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는 서버라 인터넷 엔드포인트가 없어요

  • – 해당 없음

    OAuth로 로그인

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행되며, 대신 로컬 설정을 사용해요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    도구 설명에 숨겨진 지시 없음

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 도구 목록은 인터넷 엔드포인트가 있는 서버에서만 읽을 수 있어요

검색 및 AI 기억 카테고리의 다른 서버와 비교i

  • 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 7249개 중 0%보다 스타가 많아요
  • 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 7249개 중 76%보다 최근에 레지스트리에 공개됐어요
  • 기본 점검 결과가 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 7249개 중 100%와 같거나 더 좋아요

레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.

자주 묻는 질문

UNITARES, 안전한가요?

해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.

어떤 키나 코드가 필요한가요?

레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행되나요, 클라우드에서 실행되나요?

내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. AI 앱이 필요할 때 실행하고, 데이터는 제작자의 서버를 거치지 않아요(서버 자체가 온라인 서비스를 호출하는 경우는 제외).

아직 관리되고 있나요?

GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(3.6.0)은 11일 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.

어떤 앱에서 쓸 수 있나요?

Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요.

대신 쓸 수 있는 건 뭐가 있나요?

같은 카테고리에는: Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa

대안

같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.

카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i

Context7

제작자: upstash

Up-to-date docs for AI agents

컴퓨터 또는 클라우드★ 64,224MIT오늘 업데이트
설치

Codebase Memory

제작자: DeusData

Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행★ 48,148MIT20일 전 업데이트
설치

Exa

제작자: exa-labs

Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.

클라우드에서 실행★ 5,213MIT지난달 업데이트
설치

제작자의 README

README 열기

제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.

Accountability infrastructure for long-running AI agents.

A self-hosted record your agents write to. Across sessions and runtimes, any agent or operator can look up who claimed what, on what evidence, who disputed it, and what replaced it.

Agent work outlives the process that started it. Git, scratchpads, and handoff notes carry code and in-flight task state; UNITARES keeps the shared record of claims, reviews, and outcomes across runs. When a finding is corrected or a change is challenged, the next session reads the updated record instead of acting on a superseded claim.

UNITARES is a server you run that keeps that record. Any agent or model that speaks MCP or HTTP can connect (with ready integrations for Claude Code, Codex, and Hermes Agent) and write its findings, reviews, and results to one operator-owned record. A later agent, or you, can read it back and see where each piece came from.

[See one incident without installing anything →](https://cirwel.github.io/unitares/demo.html) · Read the evidence · Install

What the record answers

QuestionMechanism
Who said it?Identity and lineage: every write to the record is bound to the process that made it, and a successor can declare which process it continues.
What supports it?Claims and evidence: findings keep their sources and corrections outside any single context window. When a newer finding replaces an older one, the older one links to it.
Who challenged it?Governed review: objections, conditions, and their resolution stay on the work they concern. Asking for review is not the same as passing it.
What happened?Outcome grounding: test, build, and task results are recorded against the check-ins that predicted them.
What can a successor recover?Reconstruction: a new process can search or export prior findings, open review conditions, and outcomes before it acts.

Digital proprioception runs on the check-in path: EISV summarizes behavioral observations over time and returns state feedback and a policy recommendation (computation contract). Second opinions let consult ask a connected local or orchestrated model, and structured dialectic records thesis, challenge, and resolution on the work.

See the record before installing

Agent A (Codex) finds a bug, records it, and exits. Agent B (Claude Code) later finds the real cause and records a finding that supersedes A's. Agent C (Hermes Agent) works on the same area in a later session and reads the record before touching the code (reading needs no identity): its search returns A's finding marked superseded, with a link to B's. C then declares lineage from A. This API sketch is separate from the hosted service-reload incident.

# Agent A (Codex)

start_session {"force_new": true} -> agent A's id store_finding {"summary": "upload retry test is flaky", ...} -> finding a record_result {"outcome_type": "test_failed", ...}

Agent B (Claude Code), in its own session, later

start_session {"force_new": true} -> agent B's id store_finding {"summary": "upload retry fails on clock skew", ...} -> finding b use_tool {"tool_name": "knowledge", "arguments": {"action": "supersede", "discovery_id": " ", "supersedes_id": " "}, ...}

Agent C (Hermes Agent), in a later session

search_shared_memory {"query": "upload retry test"} -> finding a (superseded, points to b), finding b start_session {"force_new": true, "parent_agent_id": " ", "spawn_reason": "explicit"}

The Claude Code and Codex plugin's session start points each new session at the record. For a complete call-by-call sequence, see the captured two-process walkthrough.

Install

Homebrew preview, recommended for an Apple Silicon desktop Mac: the cirwel/unitares tap installs the services natively; follow its install and first-time setup. The packaged unitares update coordinates writer shutdown, verified backup, migrations, prior-state restoration, and deep health when writers restart (schema verification when they remain stopped); kegs that predate it use the tap's one-time manual transition.

Docker Compose, on any platform: with Git, curl, and Docker Compose installed, one command starts the latest published release of the local stack (the server, PostgreSQL with AGE and pgvector, Redis, and the coordination plane; add docker-compose.full.yml for local semantic search and hybrid ranking, or use the core profile to run only the first two):

v=$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cirwel/unitares/master/PUBLISHED_VERSION) && git clone --branch "v$v" --depth 1 https://github.com/cirwel/unitares.git && cd unitares && docker compose up -d --wait
  • Endpoints and updates: connect MCP clients at http://localhost:8767/mcp/, or open the dashboard at http://localhost:8767/dashboard (Docker quickstart). On Docker, ./scripts/unitares update backs up the database, applies migrations, and verifies deep health (updating).
  • One stack per machine: Docker and Homebrew keep separate data (installation choices). Container names are fixed, so run docker compose down (without -v) in an earlier checkout before starting another (stop is not enough, because stopped containers still hold their fixed container_name values, and restart: unless-stopped revives un-stopped containers when the Docker daemon restarts), or use the managed launcher (scripts/install/launch.sh), which checks ownership first.

Connect your agents and models (Integrating agents):

  • Claude Code and Codex: unitares-governance-plugin wires MCP, lifecycle hooks, skills, and per-file edit leases (via the stack's lease plane, so concurrent work in the same checkout does not overwrite another agent's file).
  • Hermes Agent and OpenAI-compatible clients: the host adapter.
  • Any other agent, model, or hosted connector: Streamable HTTP MCP (with npx mcp-remote for stdio-only clients, or Bearer / OAuth on a dedicated public listener for hosted connectors like Claude.ai and ChatGPT), the Python SDK (pip install unitares-sdk), or the resident agent runtime.
  • Optional server-side models ([choose a model](docs/manual/02-install.md#choose-a-model-optional)): no model connection is configured by default; the core record runs model-free with no API keys. Run ./scripts/unitares model to connect a local OpenAI-compatible server (Ollama, vLLM, LM Studio, llama.cpp) for consult and in-process review, or add the agent orchestrator for cross-family CLI review.

Who it is for

For an operator running several long-lived AI agents across vendors on infrastructure they control, who wants one queryable record of identities, findings, reviews, and outcomes across the fleet.

UNITARES works alongside Git, issue trackers, handoff notes, scratchpads, evals, and guardrails: those carry code, task state, and runtime checks, while UNITARES keeps the shared record that ties the agents' claims, reviews, and outcomes together. Each agent keeps its own loop and model. Inferred pauses are advisory by default, and the operator decides when hard holds are enforced. Identity, authorization, archive, and coordination boundaries are enforced by the server.

How it fits together

UNITARES is self-hosted accountability infrastructure for operators running multiple AI agents. Its single-operator federation kernel connects independent runtimes to one operator-controlled server over MCP or HTTP, where they share a durable record while keeping their own models, tools, and runtimes. They interoperate with each other over their own transports or A2A; UNITARES is the record behind them, not the transport between them. Together this is an operator-owned accountability layer for coding, research, background, and resident agents. What it adds to an activity log is lineage and supersession: claims and evidence, reviews, and outcomes stay bound to the process that recorded them, and a replaced claim points to its replacement, for review and for reconstruction later.

Storage is PostgreSQL (with Apache AGE for supersession graph links and pgvector for embeddings) and Redis, with no required external model API. The check-in's behavioral state estimate is a form of runtime proprioception; its policy recommendation is retained in the record and is advisory by default, with optional hard-hold enforcement.

Empirical evaluations, operational measurements, and scope are documented in Evidence and limits and the Reviewer Guide.

Start here

GoalGuide
Try itInstall → two-process walkthrough
Connect an agent or applicationMCP integration · Python SDK
Operate a deploymentOperator manual
Understand the product and architectureProduct definition · Architecture
Research behind itEvidence and limits · Paper · Public dataset
ContributeContributing · Development guide
Everything elseDocumentation index

Citation and license

Kenny Wang (ORCID 0009-0006-7544-2374), CIRWEL Systems. See CITATION.cff for the versioned citation.

@misc{wang2026unitares,

author = {Wang, Kenny}, title = {{UNITARES}: Information-Theoretic Governance of Heterogeneous Agent Fleets}, year = {2026}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.19647159} }

Apache License 2.0. See [LICENSE](

앞부분만 보여 드려요. 나머지는 저장소에서 읽어 보세요

PopNx에게 묻기