GitHub
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)
GitHub repo maintainability verdicts—maintained, slowing, at-risk, abandoned—via MCP.
이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.
이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.
쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.
필요한 것
어떤 앱을 쓰세요?
위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.
웹, 데스크톱, 모바일의 Claude에서 쓸 수 있어요:
https://joeslade--github-repo-intelligence-mcp.apify.actor/mcp터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요
claude mcp add --transport http github-repo-intelligence https://joeslade--github-repo-intelligence-mcp.apify.actor/mcp프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"github-repo-intelligence": {
"url": "https://joeslade--github-repo-intelligence-mcp.apify.actor/mcp"
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"servers": {
"github-repo-intelligence": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://joeslade--github-repo-intelligence-mcp.apify.actor/mcp"
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요:
https://joeslade--github-repo-intelligence-mcp.apify.actor/mcp메뉴 이름은 요금제나 시기에 따라 조금 다를 수 있어요.
선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.
이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.
아직 이 서버의 도구 목록을 읽지 않았어요. 엔드포인트는 차례대로 돌아가며 점검해요.
누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 6일 점검
레지스트리 이름이 GitHub 계정 digitalgremlin 기준으로 확인되었고, 이 계정이 저장소를 소유하고 있어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트는 차례대로 돌아가며 점검해요
아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트는 차례대로 돌아가며 점검해요
아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트를 점검할 때 도구 목록을 읽어요
레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.
해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.
레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.
제작자의 클라우드에서 실행돼요. 설치 없이 인터넷으로 연결하지만, 보내는 내용은 제작자의 서버를 거쳐요.
GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(0.1.0)은 5개월 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. URL로 연결되기 때문에, 원격 MCP 서버를 지원하는 앱(예: 개발자 모드의 ChatGPT)에서도 쓸 수 있어요.
같은 카테고리에는: GitHub, Desktop Commander, Cloudflare MCP
같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.
카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management
Cloudflare MCP servers
제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.
_A maintainability verdict, not another dashboard._
GitHub Repo Health Check is an MCP server that answers the one question your dependency list can't: is this repo still maintained, or am I building on sand? Last-commit date lies. Star count lies. One signal isn't a verdict. So it returns a four-way read — *Actively maintained*, *Slowing*, *At-risk*, or *Likely abandoned* — synthesized across four dimensions (activity, issues, PRs, contributors), backed by the transparent, inspectable thresholds that produced it. Point it at any owner/name (or GitHub URL) and your agent gets a verdict it can act on, plus the raw numbers so it can see exactly why. Same repo state + config → the same verdict, every time.
It runs as a Standby Actor on the Apify platform — always warm, reachable over the Streamable HTTP transport at the /mcp path, with API access, scheduling, and monitoring included.
Two repos, two very different verdicts — then a drill-down into the metrics behind them, all over MCP:
If you've ever asked "is this repo abandoned?" or run a GitHub repo health check by hand, this server does it programmatically at any scale.
Most GitHub tools hand an agent raw API access and leave the judgment to the model — inconsistent, hand-rolled heuristics on every call. This server does the synthesis for you.
The differentiator is judgment, not raw access: every verdict ships alongside the pinned thresholds and raw metrics that produced it, so the agent (and you) can audit the reasoning. Same repo state + same config always yields the same verdict.
One GitHub fetch per repository is cached and shared across all five tools. Drilling from the headline verdict into a specific dimension costs no extra upstream calls.
https:// /mcp) using the Streamable HTTP transport.repo argument ("owner/name" or any https://github.com/owner/name URL) to get the headline verdict.get_activity_metrics, get_issue_health, get_pr_health, or get_contributor_insights when you need detail beyond the headline. All five tools read from the same cached payload.All tools take a single repo argument — either "owner/name" or any https://github.com/owner/name[/...] URL (case-insensitive).
get_repo_health — headline verdictReturns the overall verdict, a per-dimension breakdown, and a rationale string explaining the worst dimension.
{
"repo": "honojs/hono", "overallVerdict": "Actively maintained", "dimensions": { "activity": { "verdict": "Healthy", "lastCommitDaysAgo": 1, "commits90d": 412 }, "issues": { "verdict": "Healthy", "medianFirstResponseDays": 2.4, "staleOpenRatio": 0.12 }, "pullRequests": { "verdict": "Healthy", "mergeRate": 0.88, "oldestOpenPrDaysAgo": 14 }, "contributors": { "verdict": "Healthy", "totalContributors": 312, "busFactorFlag": false } }, "rationale": "Overall: activity is Healthy; weakest dimension is issues (Healthy).", "stars": 21000, "forks": 640, "fetchedAt": "2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z", "authenticated": true }
get_activity_metrics — commit cadence and momentumCommit volumes over trailing windows, release frequency, and a momentum trend.
{
"repo": "honojs/hono", "verdict": "Healthy", "lastCommitDaysAgo": 1, "commits30d": 140, "commits90d": 412, "commits365d": 1680, "releaseCount365d": 48, "lastReleaseDaysAgo": 3, "momentumTrend": "steady", "fetchedAt": "2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z" }
momentumTrend is accelerating / steady / declining, derived from the 30-day commit rate vs the 90-day rate. Repos that tag rather than cutting GitHub Releases will show releaseCount365d: 0 and lastReleaseDaysAgo: null — this does not by itself degrade the verdict.
get_issue_health — responsiveness and backlog hygieneHow quickly maintainers respond to issues and how much of the backlog has gone stale.
{
"repo": "honojs/hono", "verdict": "Healthy", "openIssues": 32, "closedIssues": 1840, "openClosedRatio": 0.017, "medianFirstResponseDays": 2.4, "medianTimeToCloseDays": 5.1, "staleOpenIssues": 4, "staleOpenRatio": 0.12, "fetchedAt": "2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z" }
An issue is stale if untouched for more than 90 days. Medians are null when no qualifying events exist in the analysis window — absence is not the same as zero.
get_pr_health — PR throughput and queue ageHow effectively the project merges or closes contributions, and how old the oldest open PR is.
{
"repo": "honojs/hono", "verdict": "Healthy", "openPrs": 6, "mergedPrs": 220, "closedUnmergedPrs": 30, "mergeRate": 0.88, "medianTimeToMergeDays": 1.2, "oldestOpenPrDaysAgo": 14, "fetchedAt": "2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z" }
mergeRate excludes still-open PRs from the denominator. It is null when no PRs have been decided in the analysis window.
get_contributor_insights — concentration and bus-factor riskHow many contributors the project has and whether commit activity is dangerously concentrated.
{
"repo": "honojs/hono", "verdict": "Healthy", "totalContributors": 312, "topContributorShare": 0.28, "topTwoContributorShare": 0.41, "busFactorFlag": false, "fetchedAt": "2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z" }
busFactorFlag is true when the top contributor owns more than 50% of commits, or the top two together own more than 80%. totalContributors is the repository's all-time contributor count (sourced from GitHub's stable /contributors list endpoint) — it is not a 90-day-active count.
Verdicts come from pinned, transparent thresholds — same repo state plus same config always yields the same verdict.
| Dimension | Healthy | Moderate | At-Risk | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activity | last commit ≤ 30d | 30–180d | 180–365d | Likely abandoned if > 365d |
| Issues | median first response ≤ 7d and staleOpenRatio ≤ 0.40 | ≤ 30d and ≤ 0.60 | otherwise | null median → judged on staleOpenRatio alone |
| Pull requests | mergeRate ≥ 0.60 and oldestOpenPr ≤ 30d | mergeRate ≥ 0.30 or oldestOpenPr ≤ 90d | otherwise | null mergeRate → judged on oldestOpenPr alone |
| Contributors | totalContributors ≥ 3 and not bus-factor | 1–2 contributors, or ≥ 3 with bus-factor | 0 contributors | solo active maintainer → at most Moderate |
Overall verdict is activity-dominant, evaluated top-down (first match wins):
Likely abandoned (no commits in > 365 days).At-Risk, or any two of {issues, PRs, contributors} are At-Risk.Healthy and no dimension is At-Risk.Moderate, or Healthy activity with one At-Risk dimension).The server boots with no input required (a Standby constraint — all fields are optional in the schema so the container never crash-loops on startup). In practice, you must provide a GitHub token for the Actor to return verdicts rather than rate-limit errors.
| Field | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
githubToken | string (secret) | — | Effectively required. GitHub's GraphQL API (this Actor's primary data source) rejects unauthenticated requests, and on Apify's shared IPs the anonymous REST quota (~60 req/hour per IP) is typically already exhausted by other traffic. A token gives 5,000 req/hour and enables private-repo analysis. |
cacheTtlMinutes | integer | 20 | How long a repo's fetched payload is reused before refetching. Lower = fresher data; higher = fewer GitHub API calls. |
analysisWindowDays | integer | 90 | Trailing window (30–365 days) over which issue and PR activity is measured. |
GitHub token setup. A classic token with no scopes is sufficient for public repositories. A fine-grained token scoped to specific repos works for private-repo analysis. For Standby deployments the recommended approach is to set a
GITHUB_TOKENenvironment variable on the Actor (stored as a secret) rather than pasting the token into the input field — it persists across restarts. Both paths work; both are stored as secrets and never exposed in logs.
Each tool returns a single structured JSON object (shown above in each tool's section). Responses are deterministic — same repo state plus same config always produces the same verdict. Each response includes a fetchedAt timestamp reflecting when the underlying GitHub payload was pulled. A cached read returns the same timestamp as the original fetch for that TTL window.
| Field | What it tells you |
|---|---|
overallVerdict | The headline: Actively maintained / Slowing / At-risk / Likely abandoned |
lastCommitDaysAgo | Days since the most recent commit; null if no commits found |
commits30d / commits90d / commits365d | Commit counts over trailing 30, 90, and 365-day windows |
momentumTrend | Whether commit rate is accelerating, steady, or declining (30d vs 90d rate) |
medianFirstResponseDays | Median time (days) until a maintainer first responds to a new issue |
staleOpenRatio | Fraction of open issues that have had no activity in 90+ days |
mergeRate | Merged PRs ÷ (merged + closed-unmerged) — excludes still-open PRs |
oldestOpenPrDaysAgo | Age of the oldest PR that is still open |
totalContributors | All-time contributor count (not a 90-day-active figure — see FAQ) |
busFactorFlag | true when commit activity is dangerously concentrated on 1–2 people |
This Actor runs in Standby mode and is billed for the compute used while warm and serving requests. Health reads are lightweight — each repo's GitHub data is fetched once, cached (default 20 minutes), and shared across all five tools. Drilling into multiple dimensions for the same repo costs a single upstream fetch.
A GitHub token is required in practice (see Input) and adds no extra Apify cost.
GITHUB_TOKEN as an environment앞부분만 보여 드려요. 나머지는 저장소에서 읽어 보세요