프로토타입 · 미리 보기: 공식 레지스트리의 모든 서버를 담고 있으며 30분마다 동기화해요. 리뷰와 계정 기능은 다음 단계에서 열려요.
PopNx MCPAI를 쓰는 사람을 위한 MCP 서버 · 쉬운 말로 설명해요

DJZS Trust MCP

제작자: SIFR0-dev버전 1.0.0i★ –i클라우드에서 실행
레지스트리 이름ai.djzs/trust-mcp

설치

개요

제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)

Deterministic pre-execution audit for trading agents. PASS/WAIT/FAIL, reproducible verdict_hash.

PopNx MCP의 세 기둥

이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.

할 수 있는 일

이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.

  • 연결 방식: 클라우드에서 실행
  • 전송 방식: Streamable HTTP
  • 카테고리: 회계, 재무 및 세금

설치

쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.

설치하기 전에

  • 기본 점검: 1개 중 1개 통과
  • 제작자의 서버에서 실행돼요. 내가 요청한 내용은 제작자의 서버를 거쳐요.
  • 레지스트리에 입력해야 할 키가 나와 있지 않아요.

필요한 것

어떤 앱을 쓰세요?

위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.

웹, 데스크톱, 모바일의 Claude에서 쓸 수 있어요:

  1. Settings → Connectors 열기
  2. Add custom connector 누르기
  3. 아래 주소를 붙여 넣고 Add 누르기
  4. 로그인하라고 하면 제작자의 서비스에 로그인하기
SettingsConnectors1+ Add2https://…3
https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcp

터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요

claude mcp add --transport http trust https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcp

Cursor에서 열기

또는 설정을 직접 복사하기

프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "trust": {
      "url": "https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.

VS Code에서 열기

또는 설정을 직접 복사하기

프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "servers": {
    "trust": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.

ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요:

  1. 웹에서 ChatGPT 열기 → Settings → Connectors (Apps)
  2. Create 또는 Add 누르기(일부 요금제는 먼저 Advanced에서 Developer mode를 켜야 해요)
  3. 아래 주소를 붙여 넣고 이름을 정한 뒤 저장하기
  4. 로그인하라고 하면 제작자의 서비스에 로그인하기
SettingsConnectors1+ Create2https://…3
https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcp

메뉴 이름은 요금제나 시기에 따라 조금 다를 수 있어요.

선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.

이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.

할 수 있는 일

아직 이 서버의 도구 목록을 읽지 않았어요. 엔드포인트는 차례대로 돌아가며 점검해요.

기본 점검i

누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 8일 점검

  • ✓ 통과

    제작자와 저장소 일치

    레지스트리 이름이 도메인 djzs.ai 기준으로 확인되었어요(레지스트리가 도메인 소유를 확인해요)

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    계속 관리되고 있음

    아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    라이선스 있음

    아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    엔드포인트 응답

    아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트는 차례대로 돌아가며 점검해요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    OAuth로 로그인

    아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트는 차례대로 돌아가며 점검해요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    도구 설명에 숨겨진 지시 없음

    아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트를 점검할 때 도구 목록을 읽어요

회계, 재무 및 세금 카테고리의 다른 서버와 비교i

  • 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 2907개 중 0%보다 스타가 많아요
  • 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 2907개 중 21%보다 최근에 레지스트리에 공개됐어요
  • 기본 점검 결과가 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 2907개 중 100%와 같거나 더 좋아요

레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.

자주 묻는 질문

DJZS Trust MCP, 안전한가요?

해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.

어떤 키나 코드가 필요한가요?

레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행되나요, 클라우드에서 실행되나요?

제작자의 클라우드에서 실행돼요. 설치 없이 인터넷으로 연결하지만, 보내는 내용은 제작자의 서버를 거쳐요.

아직 관리되고 있나요?

GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(1.0.0)은 4개월 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.

어떤 앱에서 쓸 수 있나요?

Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. URL로 연결되기 때문에, 원격 MCP 서버를 지원하는 앱(예: 개발자 모드의 ChatGPT)에서도 쓸 수 있어요.

대신 쓸 수 있는 건 뭐가 있나요?

같은 카테고리에는: Finance Toolkit, SolidInvoice, Korea Tax Calculator

대안

같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.

카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i

Finance Toolkit

제작자: JerBouma

500+ transparent financial methods calculated from raw statements, not third-party endpoints.

컴퓨터 또는 클라우드★ 5,496MIT어제 업데이트
설치

SolidInvoice

제작자: SolidInvoice

Create and send invoices and quotes, manage clients, and track payments in SolidInvoice.

클라우드에서 실행★ 981MIT8일 전 업데이트
설치

Korea Tax Calculator

제작자: UpstageAI

Korean tax calculation and tax-audit judgment MCP: 96 tools with statutory citations.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행★ 97MIT어제 업데이트
설치

제작자의 README

README 열기

제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.

DJZS Deterministic Pre-Execution Audit for Agents

DJZS audits the reasoning behind an autonomous agent's move *before* capital is committed, and returns one of three verdicts PASS, WAIT, or FAIL with the specific reasoning defects flagged and a reproducible hash of the decision.

The wedge: transaction-security tools answer *"is this transaction safe to sign?"*. DJZS answers a different question *"should this position be taken at all?"*. A perfectly safe transaction can still rest on broken reasoning; DJZS is the layer that catches the bad thesis.


Use it now — the live MCP gate

verify_pm_trade is deployed as a Model Context Protocol tool (streamable HTTP) on a Cloudflare Worker. Add it to an MCP-capable agent in one line:

claude mcp add --transport http djzs-trust https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcp

Then call verify_pm_trade with a free-text prediction-market trade thesis. It extracts the reasoning, audits it against the calibrated DJZS-M taxonomy, and returns PASS → PROCEED / FAIL / WAIT → HALT, with the flagged defects and a verdict_hash.

First external audit on record. An outside agent audited a benchmark thesis (pm-block-008) through the deployed tool and received:

verdict:       FAIL

flags: DJZS-M03 (PROBABILITY_UNSOURCED), DJZS-M04 (CONSENSUS_NO_EDGE) risk_score: 40 disagreements: [] verdict_hash: 0x85918814b3dffa31b00d6892c2e00b2001efd35f7e0044b4cd3789fe1df14937

Behavioral parity against the offline batteries (verdict + flags + extracted input) is green. Hash parity is a pending re-mint the calibration key lapsed during deployment so the live hash above stands as the record until it is re-run.


Pay it over HTTP x402 - the ecosystem rail

Beyond the MCP transport above, verify_pm_trade is now payable over the HTTP x402 transport, live on Base mainnet:

POST https://mcp.djzs.ai/x402/verify

An unpaid request returns an HTTP 402 challenge (exact scheme, eip155:8453, USDC, 2.00 USDC to the treasury); the client signs an EIP-3009 authorization and retries. This is the same rail Base MCP, MetaMask Agent Wallet, and x402-axios speak, so any HTTP x402 client can pay the gate directly - no MCP integration required.

Free-refusal is preserved on both transports: an out-of-scope intent is answered 402 and never settled, so a refused audit costs nothing. Verified end to end on Base Sepolia (paid settlement plus an on-chain zero-delta refusal) before the mainnet deploy.

Architecture C — extraction reports, the engine decides

DJZS separates the model-bound step from the trusted step:

free-text intent

│ ▼ EXTRACTION (LLM, N=3 consensus) reports observable FACTS, never a verdict · per-field state unanimity across the 3 samples; any disagreement → unknown · quote gates: a claimed "absent" must quote the intent verbatim, or it demotes to unknown · evidence-unanimity: a critical-driving "absent" needs the same quote across all samples │ ▼ AuditInput (each fact is tri-state: present / absent / unknown) │ ▼ DETERMINISTIC ENGINE (pure code — no model, no network, no clock) rules fire → weighted score → verdict │ ▼ PASS · WAIT · FAIL + verdict_hash

Why this shape: the verdict rules are model-independent. The LLM only turns messy text into a structured struct; the audit *rules* that decide the verdict are frozen code. Swap the model and the extraction quality changes the rules, weights, and hash do not.

Determinism by construction. The same AuditInput always yields the same verdict and the same hash:

verdict_hash = sha256(canonicalize({ verdict, risk_score, flags: codes.sorted(), unknown_fields }))

WAIT is never silent. An under-specified thesis — one where a decision-critical fact is unknown — resolves to WAIT, mapped to HALT for the caller, with unknown_fields returned so the agent knows exactly what to clarify. Abstention is a first-class outcome, never a guessed PASS or FAIL.


Taxonomies (frozen)

DJZS-M — Prediction Market (DJZS-PM-v1.0) the calibrated, live path

Weights sum to 100; FAIL threshold 25. All four codes are implemented and calibrated.

CodeNameSeverityWeightDetects
DJZS-M01NARRATIVE_RESOLUTION_GAPCRITICAL30Thesis reasons about a narrative adjacent to the actual resolution question.
DJZS-M02FALSIFICATION_ABSENTCRITICAL30No stated condition that would prove the thesis wrong before resolution.
DJZS-M03PROBABILITY_UNSOURCEDHIGH25Market or model probability asserted without verifiable basis.
DJZS-M04CONSENSUS_NO_EDGEMEDIUM15Thesis restates consensus at an extreme price with no differentiated edge.

M04 is advisory-grade. On its own it does not block a lone M04 rides a PASS with the flag on the certificate (weight 15 is below the FAIL threshold). It contributes to a block only by stacking with another finding (e.g. M03 + M04 = 40 → FAIL, as in the first audit above).

verify_pm_trade is PM-only: if the intent does not extract as a prediction-market thesis (including the undetermined case), it returns in_scope: false rather than silently running a perpetuals audit.

DJZS-LF — Perpetuals / general reasoning (DJZS-LF-v1.1)

Weights sum to 200. The taxonomy is frozen at 11 codes; 3 are wired live in the engine today (marked ●). The rest are defined and weighted but not yet firing — coverage is stated honestly rather than implied.

CodeNameCategorySeverityWeightLive
DJZS-S01CIRCULAR_LOGICStructuralCRITICAL30
DJZS-S02LAYER_INVERSIONStructuralHIGH25
DJZS-S03DEPENDENCY_GHOSTStructuralMEDIUM18
DJZS-E01ORACLE_UNVERIFIEDEpistemicHIGH25●
DJZS-E02CONFIDENCE_INFLATIONEpistemicMEDIUM18
DJZS-I01FOMO_LOOPIncentiveMEDIUM16●
DJZS-I02MISALIGNED_REWARDIncentiveMEDIUM16
DJZS-I03DATA_UNVERIFIEDIncentiveMEDIUM16
DJZS-X01EXECUTION_UNBOUNDExecutionCRITICAL15●
DJZS-X02RACE_CONDITIONExecutionHIGH9
DJZS-T01STALE_REFERENCETemporalLOW12

Both weight tables are hash-locked (WEIGHTS_HASH / TAXONOMY_HASH, and the PM equivalents, are exported constants); changing a weight is a deliberate re-derive, not a hot patch.


MCP tools

The deployed Worker exposes three tools over streamable HTTP at /mcp:

ToolWhat it does
verify_pm_tradePre-execution audit of a prediction-market thesis (the gate described above).
query_pol_certificatesRead prior ProofOfLogic certificates from the Irys datachain.
query_agent_trustLIVE on-chain trust score (subgraph-indexed): totalAudits, failRate, latest verdict, action PROCEED/HALT/NO_HISTORY.

Honest v1 posture

What the tool does not do yet — recorded deliberately, to be re-ruled before the gate is broadly promoted:

  • No ProofOfLogic write on the tool. verify_pm_trade returns a verdict_hash but does not yet anchor a certificate. Existing Irys certificates are prior-architecture lineage, not output of this tool.
  • Taxonomy hashes not in the response. The four hash constants are exported from the frozen tables but are not yet included in the tool's JSON response.

The response contract today is: verdict, action, risk_score, flags, unknown_fields, disagreements (the per-field sample-agreement telemetry), verdict_hash, extraction_failsafe, in_scope, and taxonomy versions.

Known divergence: the subgraph's raw failCount counts WAIT as FAIL

query_agent_trust excludes WAIT verdicts from both sides of the fail rate and reports them as wait_count. Anyone reading the subgraph directly, rather than through the tool, gets a different answer. djzs-subgraph/src/trust-score.ts handleScoreUpdated increments failCount on an else branch (verdict == "PASS" / else), so a WAIT — an abstention, not a failure — lands in failCount and inflates the rate for any agent that ever received one.

The Worker recomputes from per-audit verdicts, so the tool is right. The indexed counters are not, and they stay that way until the mapping is corrected and re-indexed. Both numbers are returned side by side (subgraph_counters, labelled) so the discrepancy is visible rather than discovered. Tracked as a follow-up; deliberately not folded into the read-layer fix, because a mapping change needs a subgraph redeploy and a re-index.


Legacy HTTP API (backward-compatible)

Before the MCP gate, DJZS ran as a paid HTTP audit service. Those endpoints remain for backward compatibility the MCP gate above is the current surface. The tiers are metered in USDC on Base Mainnet via an x-payment-proof header:

TierEndpointPriceMemo limit
MicroPOST /api/audit/micro$0.102,000 chars
FounderPOST /api/audit/founder$1.005,000 chars
TreasuryPOST /api/audit/treasury$10.00unlimited

POST /api/audit aliases the Micro tier, and an escrow-settled variant (POST /api/audit/escrow) takes on-chain escrow in place of a payment header. These tiers run the older detection path, not the Architecture C engine — treat their output as legacy.


On-chain artifacts

The A2A manifest (agent.json) attests four DJZS contracts on Base Mainnet, each marked verified. Source for each lives in contracts/:

ContractAddressSource
DJZSLogicTrustScore0xB3324D07A8713b354435FF0e2A982A504e81b137contracts/DJZSLogicTrustScore.sol
DJZSEscrowLock0xB041760147a60F63Ca701da9e431412bCc25Cfb7contracts/DJZSEscrowLock.sol
DJZSAgentRegistry0xe40d5669Ce8e06A91188B82Ce7292175E2013E41contracts/DJZSAgentRegistry.sol
DJZSStaking0xA362947D23D52C05a431E378F30C8A962De91e8Acontracts/DJZSStaking.sol

Addresses are as recorded in agent.json; verify any of them on BaseScan.

A fifth contract, contracts/DJZSProofOfLogicNFT.sol, exists as source only — it is not in the deployed manifest, and this document makes no claim that certificate NFTs are live or mintable.

Prior ProofOfLogic certificates live on the Irys datachain and are readable via the query_pol_certificates MCP tool. They are prior-architecture lineage, not output of verify_pm_trade.


Read the log

The commit history is the product's own audit trail: each verdict-bearing change ships with a PENDING note naming what is still unproven, and the next commit that closes it discharges that note explicitly. Every claim a recall number, a parity result, a live verdict hash — is cited to a specific run at the moment it is pushed, not asserted after the fact. If you want to know what is proven versus deferred, git log is the source of truth and this file is downstream of it.


Operator settings (not in code — set on the platform, easy to lose)

These are configured outside the repository. They are recorded here because nothing in the tree enforces them, and a silent revert would change live behaviour with no diff to point at.

SettingWhereWhy

| Browser Integrity Check: OFF for `mcp.djzs.ai` | Cloudflare dashboard → Configuration Rules | BIC returns a Cloudflare 403, `error code: 1010` to banned client signatures *before the Worker runs*. Measured 2026-09-13: Python-urllib/2.7, /3.4, /3.11, Java/1.8.0_292 and libwww-perl/6.15 were all blocked, while python-requests, curl, Wget, Go-http-client, httpx, aiohttp, node-fetch, Postman, an empty UA and custom UAs passed. mcp.djzs.ai is an API host, not a browser surface — a stdlib

앞부분만 보여 드려요. 나머지는 저장소에서 읽어 보세요

PopNx에게 묻기