Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)
4,685 pre-production checks: security, performance, scale, integrations, post-launch, people.
이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.
이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.
쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.
필요한 것
어떤 앱을 쓰세요?
위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config를 열고 claude_desktop_config.json에 이 내용을 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"prodcheck": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"prodcheck"
]
}
}
}터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요
claude mcp add prodcheck -- npx -y prodcheck프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"prodcheck": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"prodcheck"
]
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"servers": {
"prodcheck": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"prodcheck"
]
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
이 서버는 내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는데, ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요. 다른 앱을 고르세요.
선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.
이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 설치하면 AI 앱에 도구 목록이 나타나요.
누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 7일 점검
레지스트리 이름이 GitHub 계정 FarzamHabibi 기준으로 확인되었고, 이 계정이 저장소를 소유하고 있어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는 서버라 인터넷 엔드포인트가 없어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되며, 대신 로컬 설정을 사용해요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 도구 목록은 인터넷 엔드포인트가 있는 서버에서만 읽을 수 있어요
레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.
해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.
레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. AI 앱이 필요할 때 실행하고, 데이터는 제작자의 서버를 거치지 않아요(서버 자체가 온라인 서비스를 호출하는 경우는 제외).
GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(1.22.0)은 19일 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. 내 컴퓨터에 Node.js도 있어야 해요.
같은 카테고리에는: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, 御府和田玉 在售作品查询
같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.
카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Live in-stock Hetian jade from Yufu, Shanghai: prices, monthly price guide, book a viewing.
제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.
Checklists to run before you ship to production.
Built for solo founders and small teams who own the whole stack — the code, the infrastructure, the deploy pipeline, and increasingly the AI agents too — and who don't have a security team to hand it to.
4,685 items across 101 checklists in 6 domains. 88% of them apply to any stack.
One question, the tool call it makes, and the two things it finds. Sixteen seconds. The longer loop shows what is in the list instead.
Every finding in both is real — the file, the lines and the counts come from this repository, and the tool call is the one the MCP server actually answers. How they are built.
Built and maintained by the team at [Arioo](https://arioo.com) — where we ship the kind of product this checklist was written for.
I'm a founder at Arioo. Getting ready to launch, I needed a pre-production security review that covered the whole surface we actually ship: a TypeScript backend, a web app, native clients, a deploy pipeline, and a set of AI agents with real tools attached. Nothing I could find covered more than a fraction of that, so I built the checklist myself.
This repository is the checklist, not a report. It is the set of questions, generalized away from our stack and rewritten as a working document anyone can run against their own product.
Two things made it worth publishing rather than keeping:
Solo founders have no security team. You write the code, configure the infrastructure, set up the pipeline, and then you're also the one who has to decide whether it's safe to launch. There's no one to hand it to, and no obvious place to find out what you should have asked. Most public checklists are either too shallow to catch anything real or written for enterprises with a security function.
AI-assisted development changed the shape of the problem. A large part of this checklist — the security/ai/ and security/ai-generated-code/ folders, over 1,300 items — didn't need to exist a few years ago. When you ship an agent with tools, or when a model writes code you review faster than you'd review a colleague's, you inherit failure modes that standard security checklists don't cover. Those two folders are the part I couldn't find anywhere else, and the reason I bothered.
It's published under CC BY 4.0 so you can copy it into your own repo and make it yours. If it catches something before it reaches your users, it did its job.
If you are not sure which way in, don't choose — copy this into whatever AI assistant you already use (ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini). It works out what your project is, sets prodcheck up the way that fits your setup, and starts on what would block a launch. If it cannot run commands, it tells you what to run yourself.
I want to get my project ready to ship. Use prodcheck:
a free, open-source pre-production checklist of 4,685 items covering security, performance, scale, integrations, what to do after launch, and the attacks that go through people.
It is new, so do not answer it from memory. Everything you need:
Do this in order.
npx prodcheck init. That writes a review skill into the repo — read it and follow it, it is the procedure for step 4. Then run npx prodcheck --gate --stack -o BLOCKERS.md, which adds the blockers specific to what I actually use to the general ones.file:line and quote the lines, or answer UNKNOWN. UNKNOWN is a normal answer — it means a human has to go and look. Never mark anything verified on my behalf; that is my call, not yours.Work through it with me a section at a time. Do not dump the whole checklist at me.
<!-- start-prompt:end -->
Read it on the site instead → · six more prompts →
You are not meant to read this top to bottom. In order of signal-per-minute:
| 1 | Findings that should block release | If any are true, stop and fix them first |
| 2 | The "must not exist" search | A grep list. Fastest real signal in the repo |
| 3 | Authentication & authorization | Where almost every exploitable bug actually lives |
| 4 | Prompt injection | Only if you ship an LLM feature — but then, urgently |
| 5 | Your service as a weapon | The one nobody looks for until the suspension email arrives |
| 6 | Core Web Vitals | If users say it's slow, start here rather than with a score |
| 7 | Before you launch | Six items. One of them is noindex still being on |
| 8 | Can you act at all | Whether you could respond today, if you had to |
Then work section by section. Switching between edge config and database policies costs more than it saves.
checklists/
├── security/ 2981 not getting breached, abused or taken down │ ├── core/ 1,619 application, data, infrastructure, delivery │ ├── ai/ 810 LLM features, agents, tools, RAG, MCP │ └── ai-generated-code/ 552 the bugs AI coding assistants actually write ├── performance/ 313 Lighthouse, and what users actually feel ├── scale/ 288 surviving 10× the load ├── integrations/ 194 search, analytics, monitoring ├── post-launch/ 241 when it goes wrong anyway ├── people/ 87 the attacks that go around the code └── stacks/ 581 26 products, spanning every domain
Counts above are what each folder holds. A *domain* total is larger, because the stack supplements contribute to whichever domain each of their sections extends:
security 3,514 performance 338 scale 303 integrations 202 post-launch 241 people 87
Domains are the top level because that is the question you arrive with: *is this about security, or speed, or scale?*
security/core/ — applies to you regardless of languageWritten originally against a TypeScript stack, but the *controls* are not TypeScript-specific and the files no longer pretend otherwise. "Verify CORS does not use wildcard origins with credentials" is as true in Django as in Express. Everything that genuinely named a product was moved out to stacks/.
If you write Python, Go, Ruby, PHP, Java, Rust or Elixir: this folder is your checklist, all 1,619 items of it.
| Items | Items | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture & threat model | 25 | Mobile apps | 107 | |
| Authentication & authorization | 130 | Desktop apps | 41 | |
| Sessions, tokens & cookies | 23 | Runtime & containers | 109 | |
| Backend application & API | 238 | DNS, CDN, edge & WAF | 90 | |
| Web frontend | 134 | CI/CD & supply chain | 176 | |
| Database & row-level security | 72 | Monitoring & incident response | 32 | |
| Object storage & files | 69 | Pre-release gates | 151 | |
| Secrets & cryptography | 51 | |||
| Common web attacks | 63 | |||
| Business logic & race conditions | 51 | Abuse & availability | 57 |
security/ai/ — the part you won't find in a standard checklistIf your product calls a model, gives it tools, retrieves documents into its context, or runs an agent, this folder is the reason this repo exists. It is stack-agnostic and provider-agnostic.
| Items | Items | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture & identity | 70 | Multi-agent & MCP | 87 | |
| Prompt injection & goal hijacking | 95 | Integrations | 76 | |
| Tool calling & excessive agency | 71 | Cost, reliability & audit | 65 | |
| Data access & privacy | 83 | Testing & red-team pack | 97 | |
| Output handling | 67 | Release gate | 47 | |
| RAG & agent memory | 52 |
Prompt injection is not a filtering problem. It is an authorization problem wearing a
text costume — untrusted text reaching a privileged execution path.
security/ai-generated-code/ — bugs AI assistants writeAlso known as *vibe coding*. 548 items org
앞부분만 보여 드려요. 나머지는 저장소에서 읽어 보세요