프로토타입 · 미리 보기: 공식 레지스트리의 모든 서버를 담고 있으며 30분마다 동기화해요. 리뷰와 계정 기능은 다음 단계에서 열려요.
PopNx MCPAI를 쓰는 사람을 위한 MCP 서버 · 쉬운 말로 설명해요

Verify SCITT receipts from Forestrie transparency logs, offline

제작자: forestrie버전 0.8.1i★ –i내 컴퓨터에서 실행
레지스트리 이름dev.forestrie/verify

설치

개요

제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)

Verify a SCITT receipt under a trust root you hold — offline, no backend, no key, no network

PopNx MCP의 세 기둥

이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.

할 수 있는 일

이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.

  • 연결 방식: 내 컴퓨터에서 실행
  • 전송 방식: stdio
  • 카테고리: 기타

설치

쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.

설치하기 전에

  • 기본 점검: 1개 중 1개 통과
  • 내 컴퓨터에서 내 사용자 계정의 권한(파일, 네트워크, 앱)으로 실행돼요.
  • 레지스트리에 입력해야 할 키가 나와 있지 않아요.

필요한 것

  • npmNode.js 설치(npx 명령어용)

어떤 앱을 쓰세요?

위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.

Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config를 열고 claude_desktop_config.json에 이 내용을 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "verify": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@forestrie/mcp-verify"
      ]
    }
  }
}

터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요

claude mcp add verify -- npx -y @forestrie/mcp-verify

Cursor에서 열기

또는 설정을 직접 복사하기

프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "verify": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@forestrie/mcp-verify"
      ]
    }
  }
}

브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.

VS Code에서 열기

또는 설정을 직접 복사하기

프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "servers": {
    "verify": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@forestrie/mcp-verify"
      ]
    }
  }
}

브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.

이 서버는 내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는데, ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요. 다른 앱을 고르세요.

선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.

이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.

할 수 있는 일

내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 설치하면 AI 앱에 도구 목록이 나타나요.

기본 점검i

누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 6일 점검

  • ✓ 통과

    제작자와 저장소 일치

    레지스트리 이름이 도메인 forestrie.dev 기준으로 확인되었어요(레지스트리가 도메인 소유를 확인해요)

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    계속 관리되고 있음

    아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    라이선스 있음

    아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

  • – 해당 없음

    엔드포인트 응답

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는 서버라 인터넷 엔드포인트가 없어요

  • – 해당 없음

    OAuth로 로그인

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행되며, 대신 로컬 설정을 사용해요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    도구 설명에 숨겨진 지시 없음

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 도구 목록은 인터넷 엔드포인트가 있는 서버에서만 읽을 수 있어요

기타 카테고리의 다른 서버와 비교i

  • 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 32371개 중 0%보다 스타가 많아요
  • 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 32371개 중 87%보다 최근에 레지스트리에 공개됐어요
  • 기본 점검 결과가 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 32371개 중 100%와 같거나 더 좋아요

레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.

자주 묻는 질문

Verify SCITT receipts from Forestrie transparency logs, offline, 안전한가요?

해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.

어떤 키나 코드가 필요한가요?

레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행되나요, 클라우드에서 실행되나요?

내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. AI 앱이 필요할 때 실행하고, 데이터는 제작자의 서버를 거치지 않아요(서버 자체가 온라인 서비스를 호출하는 경우는 제외).

아직 관리되고 있나요?

GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(0.8.1)은 4일 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.

어떤 앱에서 쓸 수 있나요?

Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. 내 컴퓨터에 Node.js도 있어야 해요.

대신 쓸 수 있는 건 뭐가 있나요?

같은 카테고리에는: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Opencu

대안

같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.

카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i

Spec Driven Development

제작자: formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행★ 440MIT14개월 전 업데이트
설치

Remote Desktop Commander

제작자: desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

클라우드에서 실행★ 211어제 업데이트
설치

Opencu

제작자: Daily-AC

Independent local computer-use engine and MCP server for macOS, Windows, Linux and Android

내 컴퓨터에서 실행오늘 업데이트
설치

제작자의 README

README 열기

제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.

@forestrie/mcp-verify

Verify a SCITT receipt from a Forestrie transparency log under a trust root you hold. Offline: no backend, no account, no key, no network. An MCP server whose only tools verify and decode receipts.

{

"mcpServers": { "forestrie-verify": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@forestrie/mcp-verify"] } } }

npx -y @forestrie/mcp-verify demo

Why

Agents act on statements they did not witness being made: a quote, an approval, a tool result, another agent's output. Usually the record of what was said is kept by the party that said it, so nobody downstream can ask "did you really say that, and did you say it to everyone?"

A Forestrie receipt is a proof that a statement was sealed into an append-only transparency log. This package checks that proof against a trust root you hold, in your own process, without contacting Forestrie. With the right root it also answers the harder question: whether the log you were shown is the log everyone else was shown. What transparency adds, where it stops, and what a receipt contains: TRANSPARENCY.md.

What it proves

ToolReference verbWhat it answers
verify_receiptforestrie verifyWere these exact payload bytes sequenced at this entry id?
verify_grant_receiptforestrie verify-grantWas this grant admitted to this log — i.e. was the signer entitled to write?
verify_selfforestrie verifyDoes this package's own release receipt vouch for the bytes it ships?
decode_receiptforestrie decode-receipt --jsonWhat is actually in this receipt? (Renders the CBOR only. Verifies nothing.)

Every tool is annotated readOnlyHint: true, openWorldHint: false. That is not decoration: it is the machine-readable form of _"this tool touches nothing"_, and an agent can see it without running anything.

Trust roots

You do not ask for "verification". You say which root you trust, and the result says what that root can see:

RootWhat you supply
genesisthe forest's genesis document, captured when you registered
known-log-keya log owner key (keyXy, P-256) or KS256 address (ks256Address) you hold out of band
known-accumulatora snapshot of the log's peaks, from a chain read
checkpoint-chaina retained chain of .sth checkpoints, plus genesis or keyXy; delegation limits enforced per link

KS256 (secp256k1) roots verify offline too. An EOA root verifies by ecrecover, from a genesis or a known-log-key with ks256Address. A contract root (a Safe) cannot be checked without a chain read, which this package never makes: pass ks256Attestation, an ERC-1271 record fetched elsewhere (@forestrie/mcp-resolve's fetch_ks256_attestation tool, or forestrie-cli's fetch-ks256-attestation). The result is then valid _under the contract's signers at the attested block_, and says which block. A 20-byte ks256Address asserts, and does not prove, which log it owns. checkpoint-chain takes ks256Attestation too, with the KS256 genesis for the forest chain id; one attestation covers one delegation certificate, so a Safe that rotated its delegate needs one per certificate: pass them as the ks256Attestations array. Every attestation is reported in the result as used, or unused with a reason; none is silently ignored. checkpoint-chain also enforces each link's delegation limits (mmrStart, mmrEnd, expiresAt): delegation_out_of_range, delegation_expired. Since 0.7.0 a peak attached to a receipt is checked against the leaf and inclusion path rather than trusted (@forestrie/receipt-verify 3.2.0), which closes a hole in the known-accumulator and checkpoint-chain roots. Details: docs/trust-roots.md.

The roots are not ordered by strength. The first two check the operator's signature locally and cannot see a split view. The last two match the peak against an accumulator the operator does not control, and can. Every result answers four questions, sealing, split-view, append-authority and attribution, each ok, failed, or not_answered_by_this_root. The last is a real answer and must reach the user; a client that renders only ok is using this tool wrong.

When each root is the effective choice, why a genesis document fetched at check time is weaker than one kept from registration, what a signature root cannot distinguish, and the demo transcript: docs/trust-roots.md.

You do not have to trust the operator

A receipt means something without assuming the Forestrie operator is honest:

  • A pipe, not a store. Only content hashes enter the log. Your statement and its receipt stay with you, and verification is pure over those bytes, so a check never has to ask the operator for anything.
  • The operator does not hold the authority. A log's root key belongs to the log's owner, and the instance bootstrap key to whoever deployed the forest's contract. The operator's sealer signs checkpoints only for logs that have leased its key, within each lease's MMR range.
  • One published history. Checkpoints are published to the univocity contract, which refuses any that are inconsistent with what it already holds. The accumulator roots above check against that.

An operator can still decline to act, and that is visible: it can refuse admission, withhold data it serves, or stop sealing. It cannot rewrite or fork anchored history, or sign for a log that has not leased its key. Who holds which key, and what an operator can and cannot do: key custody and operator powers.

This package's own provenance

Software provenance is the familiar use case for a transparency log, so this package applies it to itself. Every release registers a small statement (package name, version, git commit) in a Forestrie log and ships the receipt inside the tarball. npx -y @forestrie/mcp-verify verify --self, or the verify_self tool, checks it offline. This complements npm's SLSA provenance; it does not replace it. Today the receipt chains to a log on the public development lane. Details: docs/self-registration.md.

That bundle is also the subject of a worked example: fetching this package's own release receipt from the public lane, verifying it under the bundled key, seeing the documented delegation_invalid under the genesis root, and getting split-view ok from a chain read — end to end in a few seconds, with no account. It lives in @forestrie/mcp-resolve's README, because fetching is that package's job, not this one's.

The verification arithmetic comes from @forestrie/receipt-verify, pinned to an exact version and published and attested separately. The tarball ships src and the frozen conformance vectors it is tested against (fixtures/PROVENANCE.md), so the arithmetic can be re-run rather than taken on trust.

Installing the package pulls in more than a verifier needs. @modelcontextprotocol/sdk brings a web stack, including express, hono, jose, cors and ajv, for HTTP transports this package never uses: it constructs only the stdio transport. The verification core never imports the SDK, and the browser-safety gate enforces that, so importing the package's "." export gives you the arithmetic without any of it.

Bundled resources, and the two calls they make runnable

The tarball ships its fixtures as forestrie://fixtures/… MCP resources, so an agent that holds nothing of its own can run a real verification. Two calls reach a pass from resources alone; both are asserted by test/node/mcp-smoke.test.ts.

A grant receipt at the genesis root — verify_grant_receipt with:

ArgumentResource
receiptgolden/grant-receipt.cbor
committedGrantgolden/committed-grant.cbor (derived from golden/manifest.json at read time)
entryIdthe text of golden/entry-id.txt
trust{root: "genesis", genesis: golden/grant-genesis.cbor}

Result: verify-grant: PASS · root=genesis · sealing ok, split-view not answered at this root, append-authority ok, attribution ok.

A payload receipt at an accumulator root, offline, against a real anchor — verify_receipt with the lane-A bundle (fixtures/lane-a/PROVENANCE.md): a real receipt from a public lane and the accumulator the univocity contract had published for its log at block 46770471, captured by an independent chain read. (That lane's content was reset on 2026-09-20; the bytes still verify, the URLs they came from no longer resolve.)

ArgumentResource
receiptlane-a/receipt.cbor
payloadlane-a/statement.cose
entryIdthe text of lane-a/entry-id.txt
trust{root: "known-accumulator", accumulator: lane-a/accumulator.cbor}

Result: verify: PASS · root=known-accumulator · sealing ok, split-view ok, append-authority ok, attribution ok, with anchor.matchedPeak set. Unlike the demo's self-derived snapshot, this anchor is the contract's published state, so the split-view answer is evidence as of that block. The same receipt passes under {root: "known-log-key", keyXy: {b64: }} and reports delegation_invalid under {root: "genesis", genesis: lane-a/genesis.cbor}, because its log is a grandchild of the forest root (docs/self-registration.md).

A resource's bytes are passed back as {b64: }; a text resource such as lane-a/log-key.xy.b64 is base64 text already, so its text goes in b64 as is. golden/burial/public-key.xy.b64 offers the burial chain's root key the same way, so checkpoint-chain can be driven from resources — to its documented negative verdict, since the burial bundle ships no leaf preimage.

Registry

This server is listed as dev.forestrie/verify in the official MCP registry.

Development

mise install           # node 22.14.0, pnpm 10.6.5

pnpm install pnpm test # browser-safe gate + encoding-copy gate + server.json gate + unit tests pnpm build

Conventions, invariants and the release checklist: AGENTS.md.

Licence

MIT.

PopNx에게 묻기