Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)
Hypothesis-driven problem solving for AI agents: probe, falsify, escalate.
이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.
이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.
쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.
필요한 것
어떤 앱을 쓰세요?
위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config를 열고 claude_desktop_config.json에 이 내용을 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"inquisitor": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"inquisitor-mcp"
]
}
}
}터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요
claude mcp add inquisitor -- uvx inquisitor-mcp프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"inquisitor": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"inquisitor-mcp"
]
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"servers": {
"inquisitor": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"inquisitor-mcp"
]
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
이 서버는 내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는데, ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요. 다른 앱을 고르세요.
선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.
이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 설치하면 AI 앱에 도구 목록이 나타나요.
누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 6일 점검
레지스트리 이름이 GitHub 계정 iamalisson 기준으로 확인되었고, 이 계정이 저장소를 소유하고 있어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는 서버라 인터넷 엔드포인트가 없어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되며, 대신 로컬 설정을 사용해요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 도구 목록은 인터넷 엔드포인트가 있는 서버에서만 읽을 수 있어요
레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.
해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.
레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. AI 앱이 필요할 때 실행하고, 데이터는 제작자의 서버를 거치지 않아요(서버 자체가 온라인 서비스를 호출하는 경우는 제외).
GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(0.2.3)은 3개월 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. 내 컴퓨터에 Python (uv)도 있어야 해요.
같은 카테고리에는: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, yontu
같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.
카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Türkçe yazı denetimi: TDK kuralları, yapay zekâ izleri, metin türüne göre üslup.
제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.
Hypothesis-driven problem solving for AI agents Probe · Falsify · Escalate — never overcomplicate, never blind-retry
inquisitor makes AI agents solve problems the way a chess engine plays chess: it cannot explore every branch, so it estimates complexity first, prunes paths that add no information, and spends its search budget only where the problem actually is.
It ships as two coordinated layers:
inquisitor-mcp) — the engine. Web search, project analysis, code tracing, project scaffolding, and a persistent investigation state machine. Works with any MCP-compatible agent: OpenCode, Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor.skills/inquisitor/SKILL.md) — the behavioral layer. Injects the probe-and-gate loop, the pruning rules, and the full methodology into the agent's reasoning.The method is not invented here — it is assembled from primary sources: Newton's Analysis→Synthesis skeleton, hardened with the scientific method's own defenses against wrong assumptions (falsification, strong inference, competing-hypotheses analysis, anti-fixation reframes, pre-mortems) and constrained by engineering discipline (NASA/JPL's Power of Ten, surgical-change guidelines, the minimalism ladder). Every source is cited in Foundations.
Web search, codebase scans, and code tracing are tools invoked when local evidence is insufficient — never mandatory rituals.
Depth is an output, not a label. An LLM's up-front difficulty guess is its least reliable signal — poorly calibrated, and biased to under-rate exactly the hard problems that matter. So inquisitor never classifies a problem before understanding it: it runs a cheap probe (the single cheapest action that could confirm or kill the best current hypothesis), and the probe's *result* — never the prediction — sets the depth:
flowchart TD
P([Problem]) --> F["FRAME done = ? · must not break = ?"] F --> D{"delegate? a specialist skill owns this"} D -->|yes| SK["hand off — /tdd, /code-review, ..."] D -->|no| PR["PROBE cheapest action that could confirm or kill the best hypothesis"] PR -->|"obvious, local"| SH[" Shallow fix → verify no ceremony "] PR -->|"clear single- component cause"| ST[" Standard frame → minimal evidence → fix → verify"] PR -->|"root cause unknown, multi-component"| DE[" Deep — Newton 7-phase: DEFINE → AXIOMS → ANALYSIS → EXPERIMENT → SYNTHESIS → VALIDATE → QUERY
SH -.->|"gate trigger / failed fix / low confidence"| ST ST -.->|"gate only raises depth — never lowers"| DE
Escalation is enforced, not just allowed. The probe is only a starting point: objective gate triggers (touching infra/deploy/routing/config, auth/security, data migrations, multi-file fixes, prod-only symptoms) force a minimum depth regardless of how "clear" the problem feels, and a 3-question confidence check (read the runtime path? can name the runtime signal? verified the platform assumption?) bumps the depth up per unanswered question. Downgrades need cited evidence, never a feeling. Inflated ceremony is not allowed either — a 7-phase investigation of a typo is as wrong as a blind guess at a race condition.
Retry is never blind. "Loop until it passes" agents (the Ralph-loop pattern) have persistence but no memory: on failure they revert, flush, and re-roll — the same wrong idea, retried with fresh confidence. Inquisitor keeps a failure ledger instead: every dead hypothesis is recorded with the evidence that killed it, every retry must name what is different and why that changes the outcome, and two dead hypotheses from the same family force a *reframe* — re-audit an assumption, invert the question, widen the system boundary — never a third attempt at the same idea. Persistence with memory, creativity on evidence.
Each rule in the method traces to a primary source. The left column is the citation; the right column is the exact mechanism inquisitor takes from it.
| Source | Mechanism adopted |
|---|---|
| Isaac Newton, *Opticks*, Query 31 (1704) | The investigation skeleton: Analysis before Synthesis — define, decompose, experiment, only then reconstruct — and closing with open Queries instead of false certainty. *Hypotheses non fingo.* |
| T.C. Chamberlin, *The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses*, Science (1890) | Hold at least two rival explanations at all times; a single hypothesis turns every subsequent observation into confirmation. |
| Abraham Luchins, *Mechanization in Problem Solving* (1942) — the Einstellung effect | The failure ledger's trigger: repeating a familiar approach after it stopped working is a measurable fixation, and the cure is a forced reframe, not another attempt. |
| Karl Popper, *The Logic of Scientific Discovery* (1959) | Falsify first: for the leading hypothesis, name the observation that would disprove it and hunt for that observation before anything else. |
| John Platt, *Strong Inference*, Science (1964) | Design the experiment that *excludes* a hypothesis, not the one that corroborates the favorite — discriminating tests over confirming tests. |
| Richards J. Heuer, *Psychology of Intelligence Analysis*, CIA (1999) | Analysis of Competing Hypotheses: rank hypotheses by the evidence *inconsistent* with each — confirming evidence is cheap and usually fits several at once. |
| Gary Klein, *Performing a Project Premortem*, Harvard Business Review (2007) | Before shipping: assume the fix is live and the problem still happens — name the likeliest reason and probe it now. |
| Source | Mechanism adopted |
|---|---|
| Gerard J. Holzmann (NASA/JPL), *The Power of Ten: Rules for Developing Safety-Critical Code* (2006) | The P10 template: a rule set small enough to remember and strict enough to check mechanically. |
| Andrej Karpathy's LLM coding guidelines (2025) | Think before coding · simplicity first · surgical changes · goal-driven execution. |
| Ponytail decision ladder | YAGNI → reuse → stdlib → native platform → installed dependency → one line → minimum code that works. |
Requires uv and Python 3.12+.
inquisitor ships as a Claude Code plugin that installs both the skill and the MCP server — no cloning, no editing absolute paths, no manual symlink.
From within Claude Code, first add the marketplace:
/plugin marketplace add iamalisson/inquisitor
Then install the plugin:
/plugin install inquisitor@inquisitor
That's it. The plugin bundles the inquisitor-mcp server (registered automatically via ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}) and the inquisitor skill. uv syncs the server's dependencies on first launch. Update later with /plugin marketplace update inquisitor.
Prefer to point at a local checkout instead of GitHub?
/plugin marketplace add /path/to/inquisitorworks too.
For OpenCode and Claude Desktop (which don't use Claude Code plugins), or for a manual Claude Code setup, use the steps below.
Option A — no clone (recommended). Once published to PyPI, uvx fetches and runs it on demand — no clone, no absolute paths:
uvx inquisitor-mcp # prints a ready message and waits for a client — Ctrl+C to exit
You'll reference uvx inquisitor-mcp directly in the config below.
Option B — from a checkout (for local development, or before the PyPI release):
git clone https://github.com/iamalisson/inquisitor.git ~/tools/inquisitor
cd ~/tools/inquisitor uv sync
The clone path is up to you — just use the same absolute path in the config below.
~does not expand inside JSON config files, so write the full path (e.g./home/you/tools/inquisitor).
You do not run the server manually. It's a stdio MCP server: your agent spawns and manages it automatically. (If you run it by hand it prints a ready message on stderr and waits silently — that's normal.)
OpenCode — add to ~/.config/opencode/opencode.json (global) or ./opencode.json (per-project):
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json", "mcp": { "inquisitor": { "type": "local", "command": ["uvx", "inquisitor-mcp"], "enabled": true } } }
Claude Code — add to .mcp.json in your project, or ~/.claude.json for all projects:
{
"mcpServers": { "inquisitor": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["inquisitor-mcp"] } } }
Claude Desktop — same mcpServers block in claude_desktop_config.json (Settings → Developer → Edit Config).
Using a checkout instead of
uvx? Swap the command foruvwith args["run", "--directory", "/home/you/tools/inquisitor", "inquisitor-mcp"].
Symlink it so it stays up to date with the repo:
# OpenCode
mkdir -p ~/.config/opencode/skills ln -s /home/you/tools/inquisitor/skills/inquisitor ~/.config/opencode/skills/inquisitor
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills ln -s /home/you/tools/inquisitor/skills/inquisitor ~/.claude/skills/inquisitor
(Copying the folder works too — you'll just need to re-copy after updates.)
Or, no clone — install just the skill across agents with the skills CLI:
npx skills add iamalisson/inquisitor
(This installs the skill only. For the inquisitor_* tools you still need the MCP server from Steps 1-2 — or use the Claude Code plugin above, which bundles both.)
Config is loaded at startup. Quit and reopen OpenCode / Claude Code, then verify: the inquisitor_* tools appear in the tool list, and the inquisitor skill is available.
| Tool | Purpose | When |
|---|---|---|
inquisitor_search | Multi-backend web search (DuckDuckGo free/keyless, Brave, SearXNG) with content extraction (HTML + PDF) | Local evidence insufficient: unknown errors, unfamiliar libraries, current best practices |
inquisitor_analyze | Project overview: languages, frameworks, tests, deps, git history | Entering an unfamiliar codebase |
inquisitor_trace | Symbol tracing: definition, callers, callees with file:line refs | Bug spans multiple functions/files |
| `inquisitor_phase_ge
앞부분만 보여 드려요. 나머지는 저장소에서 읽어 보세요