프로토타입 · 미리 보기: 공식 레지스트리의 모든 서버를 담고 있으며 30분마다 동기화해요. 리뷰와 계정 기능은 다음 단계에서 열려요.
PopNx MCPAI를 쓰는 사람을 위한 MCP 서버 · 쉬운 말로 설명해요

AVCS

제작자: izagood버전 0.42.0i★ –i내 컴퓨터에서 실행
레지스트리 이름io.github.izagood/avcs

설치

개요

제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)

AI-native version control where intent, operation, evidence and decision are first-class objects.

PopNx MCP의 세 기둥

이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.

할 수 있는 일

이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.

  • 연결 방식: 내 컴퓨터에서 실행
  • 전송 방식: stdio
  • 카테고리: 기타

설치

쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.

설치하기 전에

필요한 것

  • npmNode.js 설치(npx 명령어용)

어떤 앱을 쓰세요?

위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.

Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config를 열고 claude_desktop_config.json에 이 내용을 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "avcs": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@izagood/avcs",
        "mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "AVCS_REPO": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요

claude mcp add avcs --env AVCS_REPO=your-value -- npx -y @izagood/avcs mcp

실행하기 전에 빈 값을 채워 주세요.

Cursor에서 열기

또는 설정을 직접 복사하기

프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "avcs": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@izagood/avcs",
        "mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "AVCS_REPO": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.

VS Code에서 열기

또는 설정을 직접 복사하기

프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "servers": {
    "avcs": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@izagood/avcs",
        "mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "AVCS_REPO": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.

이 서버는 내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는데, ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요. 다른 앱을 고르세요.

선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.

직접 입력할 값

  • AVCS_REPO env
    absolute path of the AVCS repo to serve; defaults to the client cwd

이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.

할 수 있는 일

내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 설치하면 AI 앱에 도구 목록이 나타나요.

기본 점검i

누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 7일 점검

  • ✓ 통과

    제작자와 저장소 일치

    레지스트리 이름이 GitHub 계정 izagood 기준으로 확인되었고, 이 계정이 저장소를 소유하고 있어요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    계속 관리되고 있음

    아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    라이선스 있음

    아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

  • – 해당 없음

    엔드포인트 응답

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는 서버라 인터넷 엔드포인트가 없어요

  • – 해당 없음

    OAuth로 로그인

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행되며, 대신 로컬 설정을 사용해요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    도구 설명에 숨겨진 지시 없음

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 도구 목록은 인터넷 엔드포인트가 있는 서버에서만 읽을 수 있어요

기타 카테고리의 다른 서버와 비교i

  • 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 32568개 중 0%보다 스타가 많아요
  • 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 32568개 중 31%보다 최근에 레지스트리에 공개됐어요
  • 기본 점검 결과가 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 32568개 중 100%와 같거나 더 좋아요

레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.

자주 묻는 질문

AVCS, 안전한가요?

해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.

어떤 키나 코드가 필요한가요?

레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행되나요, 클라우드에서 실행되나요?

내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. AI 앱이 필요할 때 실행하고, 데이터는 제작자의 서버를 거치지 않아요(서버 자체가 온라인 서비스를 호출하는 경우는 제외).

아직 관리되고 있나요?

GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(0.42.0)은 2개월 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.

어떤 앱에서 쓸 수 있나요?

Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. 내 컴퓨터에 Node.js도 있어야 해요.

대신 쓸 수 있는 건 뭐가 있나요?

같은 카테고리에는: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, FlyDocs

대안

같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.

카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i

Spec Driven Development

제작자: formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행★ 440MIT14개월 전 업데이트
설치

Remote Desktop Commander

제작자: desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

클라우드에서 실행★ 211어제 업데이트
설치

FlyDocs

제작자: flydocs.ai

Spec-driven development workflow: your agent works issues, sessions and the status lifecycle.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행오늘 업데이트
설치

제작자의 README

README 열기

제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.

AVCS — Agentic Version Control System

*An AI-native version control system for humans and AI agents working concurrently.*

An agent should not spend its context on version control. That is the whole design goal, and it is measured rather than asserted — here is what the same work costs an agent:

What an agent pays forgit / the full surfaceAVCS
Landing a change after someone else's PR merged first (30 KB module)18,922 tokens279 tokens — *99% less*
Round trips to finish that recovery74
Tool schema, paid on every session≈8.8k tokens (39 tools)≈3.5k tokens (13, --profile core)
What a same-line collision hands the modelthe whole file, with conflict markersone object naming the two contending operations

git's recovery cost tracks the size of the file — a conflict is bytes inside it, so the agent reads the whole module and writes the whole module back to change one line. AVCS's tracks the size of the change: a conflict is an object naming the two contending operations, so it stays flat as the file grows. There is also no branch to rewrite and nothing to force-push, which is why the round trips differ — and that is *one* cycle, repeated for every PR that merges ahead of yours. Across the file sizes measured the saving is 37–99%.

None of this is a compression trick bolted on afterwards. It falls out of storing the operation graph instead of snapshots: there is no rebase to perform, so there is nothing to re-read. Method, caveats and the harness that produced the rebase numbers: avcs-demo → what it costs an agent in tokens. The schema figures are the advertised MCP surface itself — 35 KB of JSON against 14 KB, at the usual ≈4 bytes per token.

Git records when the code changed.

AVCS records who changed it, with what intent, on what evidence, and through which conflict decisions the code reached its current state.

AVCS is a new, deliberately Git-incompatible version control system built for a world where humans and many AI agents edit the same codebase concurrently. It drops the commit / branch / merge / conflict-marker model and instead stores intent, session, operation, evidence, and decision as first-class objects. The code tree is not the source of truth — it is a projection computed by deterministically *reducing* the operation graph:

state = reduce(base, operationDAG, decisions, policy, materializer)

The same objects + the same policy + the same materializer produce the same tree on any replica. Merging is not text selection; it is a pure, deterministic reduction.

Status: research prototype. The implementation is real and test-covered, but every phase is built to a *working-MVP depth* (language-neutral text 3-way merge, ed25519 signing). Structure-aware merge, semantic-break detection, multi-signature trust, and hardened distributed sync are tracked on the roadmap.

Jump in: install · your first five minutes · work against a server · connect an agent over MCP · agent quickstart walkthrough

See it run first: izagood/avcs-demo — a runnable demo of the question this design answers: *what happens when two agents edit the same file at the same time?* One ./demo.sh walks a stale-head land that is absorbed instead of rejected, a same-file auto-merge with no rebase, and a same-line collision that becomes a signed decision rather than conflict markers.

Why not a layer on top of git?

Every "AI + git" tool eventually stores the agent's context *beside* the history — commit trailers, PR comments, sidecar JSON. AVCS exists because these objects have to be load-bearing — consumed by the merge machinery itself — and bolted onto git they can't be:

  • Evidence must gate merging. git happily merges a behavior change with no passing test. In AVCS that change is graded L3 — blocked by the reducer until *trusted* evidence lands, and an operation's own author vouching for it does not count.
  • Decisions must outlive the merge. git merge resolves a conflict by emitting bytes; the choice and its rationale evaporate. An AVCS decision is a signed object — recallable later, and prior decisions bias future auto-resolution.
  • Concurrent edits must not degrade into conflict markers. Two agents editing one file meet a deterministic policy reduction (L0–L4 below), not <<<<<<< in the tree plus a human holding the pieces.
  • Intent must travel with the work. A trailer is inert text. An intent (goal + constraints + allowed scope) is what sessions open against, what leases and contention checks are scoped by, and what avcs.context.build hands the next agent.

git stores snapshots and leaves the merge to text selection; AVCS stores the operation graph and makes the merge a computation over intent, evidence, and decisions. That is why it is deliberately git-incompatible — these objects are the engine, not metadata. (git interop still exists, as a bridge: docs/14, docs/20.)

Core principles

#PrincipleContrast with Git
1Operations are history, not commitsA commit is merely a checkpoint over many operations
2Identity is the entity ID, not the file pathRename + edit can auto-merge
3Merge is a deterministic reduction, not text selectionNo conflict markers
4A conflict is a first-class `decision` object, not a broken fileThe rationale stays in history
5AI output is a proposed operation with attached evidence, not trusted codeA behavior change with no test cannot be accepted
6Code never defaults to last-write-winsPrecedence is decided by policy

How it works

Every meaningful thing is a content-addressed, append-only object. Code is a *projection* over the operation DAG, never stored as commits.

ObjectRole
intentWhy a change is being made (goal + constraints + allowed scope)
sessionAn agent/human work episode against an intent
operationA single semantic change unit — the real history
evidenceMachine-checkable proof (test / typecheck / lint / scan) attached to operations
decisionA recorded resolution of a conflict or design choice
checkpointA verified (ops + policy + materializer) state vector — replaces a commit
viewA declarative query over the operation graph — replaces a branch
releaseA signed, provenance-bearing checkpoint — replaces a tag
policyThe deterministic merge rules the reducer is parameterized by

…plus blob for raw content and the governance objects (lease, membership, protection, promotion, redaction, override, approval, line, integration) used by the multi-machine and security phases.

Conflict resolution levels

AVCS never falls back to last-write-wins for code. Contending operations are graded and resolved with a recorded rationale:

  • L0 / L1 — different entities, or disjoint line regions in the same file → auto-merge
  • L2 — concurrent edits that overlap the same line region → policy auto-decision (human-preferred, trust-weighted); the auto-decision is itself recorded in autoDecisions
  • L3 — a behavior change with no *trusted* evidence → blocked
  • L4 — a public-API break → requires a human decision, routed to the scope's owners

Evidence trust matters: an operation's own author cannot vouch for it. Evidence-gating and the passing-test bonus only count evidence produced by a *non-authoring, trusted* actor (CI bot / human).

What works today

The reducer and policy engine are the foundation; the higher phases build distributed collaboration, security, and observability on top.

Foundation (Phases 1–6)

  • Storage core — append-only, content-addressed object store (.avcs/objects)
  • Deterministic reducer + policy engine — the L0–L4 conflict grading above, with a priority ladder, bounded reliability nudges, and auditable auto-decisions
  • Language-neutral text merge (Phase 2) — a deterministic N-way line-level 3-way merge (src/merge/merge3.ts), so edits to disjoint regions of one file auto-merge regardless of language; overlapping edits become a policy-resolved conflict region. No language parsing in the core
  • Cryptographic trust (Phase 3) — ed25519-signed evidence/decision; forged signatures fail the trust gate. Real validation runner, WorkLease, RepairContext
  • Decision memory (Phase 4) — recallable prior human decisions (recallDecisions) and distilled "learned policies" that bias future auto-resolution
  • Policy depth (Phase 5) — code-owner routing and bounded reliability learning
  • Release & provenance (Phase 6) — verified checkpoints + CycloneDX SBOM + signed artifacts

Collaboration, scale & security (Phases 7–12)

  • Phase 7 — multi-machine: membership/roles (signed key federation), pull (object gossip; two replicas converge to the same treeHash), protection + finalize CAS (non-fast-forward rejected, so a stale push can't overwrite fresh history)
  • Phase 8 — lineage: long-lived divergent lines (e.g. v1.x ∥ v2.x, same path, different content, zero conflict), portOp (backport = cherry-pick)
  • Phase 9 — scale: entity index, materializeAt (time travel), chunked large-blob storage with dedup
  • Phase 10 — observability: blame (who/why), logP, deterministic bisect, diff
  • Phase 11 — external contributions: quarantine tier + promote + untrusted-CI gate
  • Phase 12 — security: redact (byte-eviction of leaked secrets, oid preserved), break-glass override, forward-only rollback
  • Local undo (docs/23) — avcs undo [--last | …] [--purge] [--no-git]: drop local ops from the view, and with --purge evict the bytes they uniquely reference. Refuses once the ops have been pushed, because that case belongs to admin-gated redact. In a git-bridged repo --purge clears the git copy too — but only where it can prove the rewrite is safe and local (nothing on a remote, the commits at the tip, no other work in them, a clean tree); anywhere else it still does the AVCS side and names precisely what is left and the one command that fits, up to and including "rotate the credential, it is already published"
  • The working tree is genuinely derived — checkout records what it projected (.avcs/projection.json, path → blob oid) and, on the next projection, removes the files the target view no longer contains. Files it never wrote — build output, ignored files, anything you just created — are untouched, and a projected file you have since edited is kept and named in a notice rather than silently overwritten. Switching views therefore yields *that view*, not the union of every view pro

앞부분만 보여 드려요. 나머지는 저장소에서 읽어 보세요

PopNx에게 묻기