프로토타입 · 미리 보기: 공식 레지스트리의 모든 서버를 담고 있으며 30분마다 동기화해요. 리뷰와 계정 기능은 다음 단계에서 열려요.
PopNx MCPAI를 쓰는 사람을 위한 MCP 서버 · 쉬운 말로 설명해요

Portunus

제작자: mdostal버전 0.34.0i★ –i내 컴퓨터에서 실행
레지스트리 이름io.github.mdostal/portunus

설치

개요

제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)

Secret broker for agents: reference secrets by name; values injected only at the execution boundary.

PopNx MCP의 세 기둥

이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.

할 수 있는 일

이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.

  • 연결 방식: 내 컴퓨터에서 실행
  • 전송 방식: stdio
  • 카테고리: 기타

설치

쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.

설치하기 전에

  • 기본 점검: 1개 중 1개 통과
  • 내 컴퓨터에서 내 사용자 계정의 권한(파일, 네트워크, 앱)으로 실행돼요.
  • 레지스트리에 입력해야 할 키가 나와 있지 않아요.

필요한 것

어떤 앱을 쓰세요?

위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.

Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config를 열고 claude_desktop_config.json에 이 내용을 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "portunus": {
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "-i",
        "--rm",
        "ghcr.io/mdostal/portunus:0.34.0",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요

claude mcp add portunus -- docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/mdostal/portunus:0.34.0 mcp

Cursor에서 열기

또는 설정을 직접 복사하기

프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "portunus": {
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "-i",
        "--rm",
        "ghcr.io/mdostal/portunus:0.34.0",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.

VS Code에서 열기

또는 설정을 직접 복사하기

프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "servers": {
    "portunus": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "-i",
        "--rm",
        "ghcr.io/mdostal/portunus:0.34.0",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.

이 서버는 내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는데, ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요. 다른 앱을 고르세요.

선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.

이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.

할 수 있는 일

내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 설치하면 AI 앱에 도구 목록이 나타나요.

기본 점검i

누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 7일 점검

  • ✓ 통과

    제작자와 저장소 일치

    레지스트리 이름이 GitHub 계정 mdostal 기준으로 확인되었고, 이 계정이 저장소를 소유하고 있어요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    계속 관리되고 있음

    아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    라이선스 있음

    아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

  • – 해당 없음

    엔드포인트 응답

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는 서버라 인터넷 엔드포인트가 없어요

  • – 해당 없음

    OAuth로 로그인

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행되며, 대신 로컬 설정을 사용해요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    도구 설명에 숨겨진 지시 없음

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 도구 목록은 인터넷 엔드포인트가 있는 서버에서만 읽을 수 있어요

기타 카테고리의 다른 서버와 비교i

  • 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 32718개 중 0%보다 스타가 많아요
  • 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 32718개 중 69%보다 최근에 레지스트리에 공개됐어요
  • 기본 점검 결과가 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 32718개 중 100%와 같거나 더 좋아요

레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.

자주 묻는 질문

Portunus, 안전한가요?

해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.

어떤 키나 코드가 필요한가요?

레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행되나요, 클라우드에서 실행되나요?

내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. AI 앱이 필요할 때 실행하고, 데이터는 제작자의 서버를 거치지 않아요(서버 자체가 온라인 서비스를 호출하는 경우는 제외).

아직 관리되고 있나요?

GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(0.34.0)은 17일 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.

어떤 앱에서 쓸 수 있나요?

Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. 내 컴퓨터에 Docker도 있어야 해요.

대신 쓸 수 있는 건 뭐가 있나요?

같은 카테고리에는: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, MemberVault MCP by usefulapi

대안

같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.

카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i

Spec Driven Development

제작자: formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행★ 440MIT14개월 전 업데이트
설치

Remote Desktop Commander

제작자: desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

클라우드에서 실행★ 211그저께 업데이트
설치

List courses; add users to courses, remove course access or delete users in MemberVault.

클라우드에서 실행오늘 업데이트
설치

제작자의 README

README 열기

제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.

Portunus

A secret broker that finds secrets by metadata and injects them — without them ever touching your LLM. Free & open source.

Built by Mathew Dostal — fractional CTO, Dostal Technology.

Choose your vault. Give your AI agents safe tooling to use it — without secrets ever touching

the LLM.

portunus is a thin broker between your AI agents and the secret vault you already run. It doesn't store your secrets or reinvent vault security — it resolves them by metadata and injects them at the boundary, so an agent can use a secret (call an API, deploy, sign) without the raw value ever landing in the model's context, logs, or tool output.

*(Portunus — the Roman god of keys and doors. Fitting.)*

Get your agent using it in one command

curl -fsSL https://mdostal.github.io/portunus/install.sh | bash

Installs the CLI, wires the MCP server into whatever AI coding agent CLIs are already on the machine (Claude Code, Codex CLI today), and drops in the usage skills — so an agent gets the *boundary-only* usage conventions immediately, not just a raw tool list. Already have portunus installed? Just run portunus agent init — same thing, idempotent, safe to re-run any time (e.g. after installing a new harness). portunus agent status shows what's currently wired without changing anything.

Since this runs standalone often — a local key-value store on its own, not just a plugin — it keeps itself current too: portunus update check (read-only) / portunus update run (installs, with either an interactive confirm or --yes) walk the same "your own already-authenticated gh CLI, pinned to an exact release tag, never a silent unattended swap" posture as the desktop app's updater. A one-line stderr heads-up ("portunus vX.Y.Z is available…") shows up on its own, throttled to once a day, never installs anything by itself — opt out any time with PORTUNUS_NO_UPDATE_CHECK=1.

[portunus site →](https://mdostal.github.io/portunus/) — landing page, install snippets, and the component-model pitch in one place.

[Documentation →](https://mdostal.github.io/portunus/docs/) — quickstart, concepts, architecture, CLI/MCP reference, and Process & Design, the design record behind every feature, published from .pHive/ and rebuilt on every push to main.

The problem

AI agents need real secrets to do real work — deploy tokens, API keys, DB creds. But the moment a secret touches an LLM's context, a log line, or a tool result, it's leaked. Most teams already have a vault. What's missing is the layer that lets an agent use that vault safely.

That's portunus.

What works today

  • The secret value never enters the LLM's context, logs, or tool output. Enforced by code — every boundary path (the resolver's three sinks, every MCP tool, every adapter's failure path) is covered by a test that asserts the value never appears in a return value, stdout/stderr, or the audit log, including on the failure path, not just the happy one.
  • Resolve by metadata. Ask for anthropic / demo / prod by what it *is*, not by memorizing a key name. Fail-closed — an ambiguous match refuses and lists candidates, never returns the wrong secret.
  • Inject at the boundary — env var, file (env/json/yaml), subprocess argv, or a 0600 tempfile. The agent gets a *reference* or a *path*, never the value.
  • Bring your own vault — GCP Secret Manager (keyless, via Workload Identity Federation), a local-encrypted vault (Fernet: AES-128-CBC + HMAC-SHA256, zero cloud setup), and Chrome's own saved logins (macOS Keychain / Linux Secret Service-KWallet, read-only — see docs/backends.md) work today.
  • One core, three doors — an MCP server (21 tools, metadata-only by default), a 35-command CLI, and a Next.js UI (plus a native macOS desktop shell around the UI).
  • Tamper-evident, hash-chained audit log — keyed by secret *name*, never value. portunus verify proves the chain.
  • Per-agent access control, opt-in. portunus roles set --principal scopes a policy to a specific identity (org/project/env/repo); portunus roles enforce on activates it. A scope with no configured policy always stays fully open — enforcement only ever narrows what a *specific* principal can reach, never a surprise lockout. See "Access control (Petitio)" below.

Roadmap (help wanted)

  • More vault backends — HashiCorp Vault, AWS, Azure, 1Password, Doppler, Infisical *(fail-closed stubs today — request the one you need and it jumps the queue)*
  • Native HTTP-client injection adapter *(today it's portunus resolve --exec curl ..., or a caller-supplied boundary callable via the library's resolve_call — works, but there's no built-in HttpHeaderAdapter/HttpBodyAdapter class yet, only EnvVarAdapter/FileAdapter)*
  • More secret-rotation adapters *(eight real adapters ship today, all run via portunus rotation run: OAuth refresh tokens, GCP service-account keys, Google Cloud API keys, Resend API keys, Grafana Cloud access policy tokens, YouTrack/Hub permanent tokens, Vercel access tokens, and GitHub OAuth App tokens from an App you own. GitHub PATs are manual because GitHub has no reissue API. Stripe is still a stub that raises. portunus liveness check flags dead GitHub tokens. See docs/rotation.md for the per-subtype capability matrix)*
  • Scope-aware list/tree — these two MCP tools still return full-vault metadata regardless of the caller's own access scope; only the actual resolve/inject path is gated today *(a real, named gap — not started; portunus-petitio-rbac design-discussion.md's self-grill)*
  • Approval tokens (portunus approve) are scoped to a reference name only, not to the identity that requested it — a different concurrently-running agent can walk through the same approval window *(also a real, named gap, same source)*

Honest scope

Portunus guarantees that its own paths never leak the value. It can't stop a command *you* wrap from echoing its own argument — echo {{secret}} will print the secret, because that's the command's doing, not portunus's. That's the correct, defensible boundary, and it's documented in the code.

Built in the open

Solo-built and moving fast. The core is real and tested; the backends and rotation are where the growth is. Break it, tell me where it leaks, open issues, send PRs — poking a hole in the security model is a *gift*, open it as an issue.

Quick start

curl -fsSL https://mdostal.github.io/portunus/install.sh | bash   # or: pip install -e ".[test]" from a clone

store a secret -- stdin/file only, never an inline flag (would land in shell history)

echo -n "sk-ant-..." | portunus drop shared-anthropic dostal-shared-anthropic --stdin portunus state shared-anthropic enabled # lands dropped/fail-closed by default; this makes it injectable

resolve it only at the boundary -- the value never touches your shell history, a log, or an LLM turn

portunus resolve --exec curl -H "Authorization: Bearer {{secret:shared-anthropic}}" \ https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages

See Install and Usage below for the full picture — registering an existing secret instead of dropping a new one, tag-based lookup, the MCP server, and the UI.

Architecture, vision & design decisions

  • [docs/architecture.md](docs/architecture.md) — the adopter-facing reference: a component diagram, ARCA's backend-selection precedence as a decision tree, Petitio today-vs-the-designed- future, the full request/resolve sequence, and the rotation-provenance design — five diagrams, kept honest about what's real versus what's a stub.
  • Long-term direction (from this project's own planning doc, .pHive/project-profile.yaml):

Portunus is a standalone, releasable, containable secret finder/manager — not just a

Dostal-harness plugin. [...] GCP Secret Manager is the store; Portunus is the

resolver+injector layer on top — that split is decided, not open. Long-term it should also

self-declare as an L2 Pantheon plugin [...] while still standing up its own harness

integration (skill/CLI) and UI when run standalone.

  • Every design decision, with the reasoning, not just the outcome — .pHive/epics/ holds a research brief + design discussion (often with an adversarial "grill" pass) for every feature this project has shipped: why local+GCP are the only real ARCA backends today, why rotation first shipped as provenance-only, why the desktop app shells out to gh instead of embedding a token, and more. This is the actual paper trail, not a curated highlight reel.
  • [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md) — what shipped, release by release.
  • Adapter pattern — a new ARCA backend implements one method (access(sm_name, project="") -> str, see SecretBackend in backend.py) and fails closed with a clear error until it's real; request one or see an existing stub (e.g. InfisicalBackend) as a template.

Component model

Portunus is the whole secret-broker system, not any single piece of it. Its components carry their own (Latin, theme-consistent) names:

ComponentRoleWhere it lives today
OSTIARIUSThe gatekeeper API — the *only* way to request things from the vault or deposit things into it (the request/deposit boundary), including metadata-only queries like "what secrets exist for this project". Three entry points, one implementation: the portunus CLI, the standalone UI's API routes, and an MCP stdio server for other agents/harnessesresolver.py + the portunus CLI (cli.py) + mcp_server.py (portunus mcp)
ARCAThe vault store — pluggable backends behind one interface, actually selected per-Reference/per-project (a reference's own backend override, else its project's VaultBinding, else the global fallback), not one global choice. Real today: local-encrypted (default), GCP Secret Manager (keyless via WIF, optionally with a recency-aware pull-only sync-down cache that survives a real network outage by serving the last-known-good cached value), OAuth refresh-token broker, and Chrome's own saved logins (macOS Keychain / Linux Secret Service-KWallet, read-only, Windows deferred — docs/backends.md). Honest stubs, not yet real: AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Infisical, Doppler, 1Password, Azure Key Vault — each fails closed with a clear error and a link to request it, never silently mis-routes. See docs/architecture.md for the full picture.localvault.py (LocalEncryptedBackend, default); backend.py (SecretBackend, GcloudBackend, SyncingBackend, VaultBinding, and the six stub classes); auth.py (keyless WIF/OIDC credential minting); discover.py (read-only enumeration of what already exists in a live provider project)

| Petitio | The approval-gate wrapper — wraps every OSTIARIUS request so access is always gated (grant / gate / approve + lifecycle guard). Per-agent access control is real and opt-in: every call threads an Identity (requester) through check_injectable(), which evaluates it against roles.py's PolicyRecords (org/project/env/repo scope + principal) via roles.evaluate() — every resolve gets a would-allow/would-deny audit line regardless, but only actually *raises* NotAuthorized when portunus roles enforce on has been explicitly run for that vault (default: off; a scope with zero configured policies a

앞부분만 보여 드려요. 나머지는 저장소에서 읽어 보세요

PopNx에게 묻기