Finance Toolkit
500+ transparent financial methods calculated from raw statements, not third-party endpoints.
제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)
FIBER decision-context compiler with honest omission accounting: 259 evidence-bearing MCP tools.
이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.
이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.
쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.
필요한 것
어떤 앱을 쓰세요?
위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.
링크는 제작자의 파일로 바로 연결돼요. 우리가 보관하거나 다시 패키징하지 않아요. 파일을 열면 Claude Desktop이 설치해요.
터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요
claude mcp add aurora-agent -- npx -y aurora-agent-mcp프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"aurora-agent": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"aurora-agent-mcp"
]
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"servers": {
"aurora-agent": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"aurora-agent-mcp"
]
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
이 서버는 내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는데, ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요. 다른 앱을 고르세요.
선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.
이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 설치하면 AI 앱에 도구 목록이 나타나요.
누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 7일 점검
게시자(MurariAmbati)가 저장소 소유자(AURORA-NEURO)가 아니에요. 다른 사람이 등록했을 수 있어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는 서버라 인터넷 엔드포인트가 없어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되며, 대신 로컬 설정을 사용해요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 도구 목록은 인터넷 엔드포인트가 있는 서버에서만 읽을 수 있어요
레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.
해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 0개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.
레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. AI 앱이 필요할 때 실행하고, 데이터는 제작자의 서버를 거치지 않아요(서버 자체가 온라인 서비스를 호출하는 경우는 제외).
GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(0.1.4)은 2개월 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. 내 컴퓨터에 MCPB, Node.js도 있어야 해요.
같은 카테고리에는: Finance Toolkit, SolidInvoice, Korea Tax Calculator
같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.
카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i
500+ transparent financial methods calculated from raw statements, not third-party endpoints.
Create and send invoices and quotes, manage clients, and track payments in SolidInvoice.
Korean tax calculation and tax-audit judgment MCP: 96 tools with statutory citations.
제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.
Query-compiled inference for executable biology.
Context engineering, with receipts.
An MCP server and CLI built on the FIBER decision-context compiler: a typed decision query is compiled into the smallest decision-sufficient evidence region, delivered with a Context Certificate stating exactly what was omitted.
The preclinical glioma engine now compiles a complete bounded research workflow, adapts its next stage from typed outcomes, and admits only capability-matched institution-local workers before dispatch. Worker routing is deterministic and fail-closed; the engine never turns an unimplemented stage into a generic action and never makes clinical decisions. The route can also drive the autonomous engine end to end through the typed stage/action adapter; MCP exposes this as a simulation-only rehearsal, while production hosts supply their own local workers. Evidence is an execution gate, not a passive report: P01 cross-family triangulation must qualify before the P07 stage router can admit a worker. The evidence-gated stage engine returns an explicit evidence hold or capability hold with next actions, and only then runs bounded evidence, multimodal, mechanism, experiment, computation, replication, release, and federation stages.
Implementation of the AURORA BioPRISM / OncoWorld / FIBER blueprint (v0.6, 935 registered spec modules). A Rust workspace whose central idea is that context assembly is a compiler pass: instead of retrieval plus summarisation plus vibes-based compaction, a typed decision query is compiled into the smallest decision-sufficient evidence region, delivered as a Decision Section, and accompanied by a Context Certificate that states exactly what was omitted and whether the omission could have changed the decision.
Compile the smallest decision-sufficient evidence region. Never traverse the whole knowledge
structure by default.
The reference world ships 761 facts, 750 of them exploratory distractors that all consume the same protected cohort_id hub. FIBER compiles the query down to 11 facts (1.45% of the world) and the deterministic oracle still returns the correct verdict with all four leakage witnesses.
It is not alone in doing so. Under equal tuning, a 5-hop incidence walk and a BM25 retriever at k=11 select *exactly the same eleven facts*. The distribution's own compare_baselines.py measures the graph baseline only at depth 7 and unbounded — the two settings where it returns everything — and reports a 69× advantage that vanishes under equal tuning. That is a strawman comparison, and correcting it is what 43.38 and 43.41 require.
So the reference world cannot tell these methods apart. crates/worldgen makes the structure a parameter and builds one that can — distractors attached near the target instead of at a hub leaf, decisive facts behind a relay chain, and distractor tags camouflaged to tokenise into the protected vocabulary:
| Strategy | Facts | Sound? | Closure | Admissible |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| full-context | 762 | yes | 100% | yes |
| graph-5-hop | 750 | no | 0% | no |
| graph-7-hop | 750 | no | 0% | no |
| graph-11-hop | 761 | yes | 100% | yes |
| lexical-top-11 (BM25) | 11 | yes | 91% | no |
| fiber | 11 | yes | 100% | yes |
Three distinct failure modes appear. The graph walk has no usable depth: 5–10 pull in 98% of the world *and still miss every decisive witness*; 11 is the first sound setting and by then it has taken everything. BM25 reaches the *right verdict* from a 91% protected closure — right by luck, having dropped a protected fact that happened not to matter, and raising k to 50 never recovers it. FIBER is the only admissible strategy: right verdict and full closure, at 11 facts.
That last failure is why the harness ranks on admissibility rather than verdict alone — ranking on verdict would have crowned the strategy that violated the mandatory closure and got away with it.
This does not show FIBER wins generally: the discriminating world was built to expose these modes, just as the reference world was built to expose hub expansion. The full structural family sweep has now been run — 36 cells over attachment x relay depth x tag style x distractor count — and the two formerly missing baselines are in the panel. The sweep's headline is a negative result for FIBER: a plain backward walk over the *directed* factor edges, closure first, is admissible in all 36 cells at exactly FIBER's fact count, so on this family admissibility and cost cannot distinguish the compiler from that walk; the fixed-basis embedding retriever, by contrast, fails every camouflaged cell at the tight budget. Full analysis: docs/FINDINGS.md. How much of the blueprint the workspace actually covers, and which sections have nothing standing in for them: docs/COVERAGE.md. The crate layout and the blueprint path: docs/ARCHITECTURE.md.
The Rust glioma research engine tracks executable capabilities in docs/glioma/PROGRAM_PLAN.md. P10 F32 adds longitudinal replication transport through analyze_glioma_longitudinal_transport and the MCP tool glioma_longitudinal_transport_analyze: studies must bind the same estimand and effect unit and cover one shared time grid, with incomplete studies excluded rather than imputed. Different model systems incur the maximum transport gap and are included only when the request explicitly allows that maximum; signature similarity weights admitted sources. Effects are bounded to ±1,000,000,000 milli-units before fixed-point pooling. Its gate and threshold policy is explicitly repository-defined because this checkout has no configured detailed source blueprint for that slot.
P10 F03 plans prospective resolvers for conflicting preclinical claims through analyze_glioma_prospective_contradiction and MCP glioma_prospective_contradiction_plan. Rival statements, evidence reports, design reports, and local artifacts remain digest-bound. Evidence is counted by independent group, shared support across rivals cannot establish exclusive support, and low-quality, null, and unresolved findings remain visible. Resolver prediction intervals must separate a rival pair and pass feasibility, risk, and budget gates. A plan_ready result means the bounded portfolio covers all declared rival pairs; it does not mean an experiment ran or a claim was resolved. Its contract is repository-defined because this checkout has no detailed P10-F03 blueprint configured.
P10 F02 compares independent study effects through analyze_glioma_multistudy_concordance and MCP glioma_multistudy_concordance_analyze. It binds an exact estimand and unit, reports every eligible same-model pair by interval overlap and confident direction, and keeps cross-model pairs incomparable. It retains null, unresolved, and low-quality studies without imputation or pooling. The contract is repository-defined because this checkout has no configured detailed P10-F02 blueprint.
P10 F04 audits registered-outcome reporting through audit_glioma_registered_outcome_reporting and MCP glioma_registered_outcome_reporting_audit. It compares local registry protocols with reviewed result-report metadata, marks overdue missing primary outcomes, and separates incomplete, ambiguous, unregistered, and not-yet-due outcomes. It accepts no effect values and treats reporting differences as review signals rather than proof of publication bias or misconduct. Its contract is repository-defined because this checkout has no detailed P10-F04 blueprint.
P10 F05 adds build_glioma_registered_outcome_record and MCP glioma_registered_outcome_record_build for a single digest-bound study outcome. P10 F06 adds build_glioma_registered_outcome_evidence_panel and MCP glioma_registered_outcome_evidence_panel to combine compatible records across independent studies without pooling effects. The companion glioma_registered_outcome_sensitivity_analyze route evaluates caller-declared missing-result ranges as separate scenarios. These contracts are repository-defined because this checkout has no detailed P10-F05/F06 blueprints.
The Rust runtime also exposes an opt-in Docker-backed command boundary for callers that need an explicit Linux process boundary. It is not connected to agent tool dispatch or the trial provider; its limits and integration boundary are documented in docs/OCI_SANDBOX.md.
The Python SDK includes a secret-safe operator entry point for the autonomous brain:
cd python
python -m prism_sdk catalogue python -m prism_sdk evidence-plan --domain science python -m prism_sdk provider-status --provider openai
For keyless local development, the same boundary supports an explicit credentialless fixture: python -m prism_sdk provider-status --provider local and run --provider local --model local-model use the runtime's bounded in-memory transport; no key or network provider is contacted. For actual local-model inference without an OpenAI key, use the first-class Ollama preset: python -m prism_sdk provider-status --provider ollama (default endpoint http://127.0.0.1:11434/v1), then run with --provider ollama --model and --approve-provider-call. The Ollama path is explicit, credentialless, OpenAI-compatible, and loopback-by-default; it fails closed when the local server is unavailable rather than falling back to a synthetic response. For a grounded research pass, LocalNeurosurgicalAgent.grounded_real_data_research() / grounded_public_literature_research() (Python) or groundedRealDataResearch() / groundedPublicLiteratureResearch() (TypeScript) composes a bounded real-data or six-specialty PubMed context, an explicitly approved credentialless local-model call, and the matching authoritative draft-claim audit. It accepts Ollama or another caller-registered local provider, returns context/bundle digests and structured claims, and remains grounded_for_human_review; a provider outage fails closed and never produces synthetic evidence. Before the authoritative draft audit, the bridge requires every model citation to be present in the exact bounded context it received; unseen-but-valid snapshot records are rejected rather than treated as grounded. Set tool_loop=True (Python) or toolLoop: true (TypeScript) to expose bounded, read-only, credentialless snapshot tools to the local model: row search, a ClinicalTrials.gov trial-landscape view (neurosurgery_real_data_trial_landscape_view), and a cBioPortal/GDC molecular-coverage view (neurosurgery_real_data_molecular_coverage_view). Calls are capped by explicit turn and call budgets, recorded as a sanitized tool_trace, and their returned citation identities are added to the closure check; the final audit widens only to the same source facets, never to a network or patient-data tool. The trial and molecular views, plus the comparative neurosurgery_real_data_cohort_landscape_view, return descriptive aggregates plus exact rows for citation, not eligibility, efficacy, safety, treatment, or patient inference. A third review-queue view (neurosurgery_real_data_review_queue_view) exposes only explicit missing-link, abstract, date, or sample-cou
앞부분만 보여 드려요. 나머지는 저장소에서 읽어 보세요