ClevSec EU compliance tools

할 수 있는 일

이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.

• 연결 방식: 클라우드에서 실행
• 전송 방식: Streamable HTTP
• 카테고리: 기타

설치

쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.

필요한 것

• 클라우드에서 실행설치할 것 없음. 인터넷으로 연결돼요

어떤 앱을 쓰세요?

https://mcp.clevsec.one/mcp

claude mcp add --transport http eu-compliance https://mcp.clevsec.one/mcp

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "eu-compliance": {
      "url": "https://mcp.clevsec.one/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "servers": {
    "eu-compliance": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.clevsec.one/mcp"
    }
  }
}

https://mcp.clevsec.one/mcp

선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.

이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.

할 수 있는 일

도구 이름과 설명은 서버가 2026년 11월 6일에 알려 준 그대로예요. 우리가 아니라 제작자가 쓴 글이고, 일반 텍스트로만 보여 드려요.

• reporting_deadlines

  Use for any question about incident or breach reporting deadlines in the EU (for example 'how long do we have to report a breach / a cyber incident?'). Lists who must report what, to whom and by when under GDPR (personal data breaches), NIS2 (significant incidents), DORA (major I

• nis2_scope_check

  Use for questions like 'does NIS2 apply to my company?', 'are we an essential or important entity?' or 'is a company of this size and sector in scope?'. Indicates whether the NIS2 Directive applies to an organisation and in which category (essential or important), from its sector

• nis2_gap_assessment

  Use to assess how ready an organisation is for NIS2 cybersecurity requirements, or to find its gaps. Call without answers to get the 53 questions in nine domains (governance, risk, incidents, continuity, supply chain, network security, vulnerabilities, training, cryptography), ea

• dora_classify_incident

  Use when a bank, insurer, investment firm, payment or crypto-asset firm or other financial entity has an IT outage, cyber attack or data incident and asks whether it must be reported under DORA. Classifies the ICT-related incident as major or not under DORA, applying the criteria

• dora_checklist

  Use for 'what does DORA require?', DORA compliance checklists or gap reviews. Returns the core DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554) requirements for financial entities, grouped by section with the article for each, leaving out those that DORA itself disapplies for microenterprises or

• dora_gap_assessment

  Use to assess how ready a financial entity is for DORA, or to find its gaps. Call without answers to get the 39 questions in five pillars (ICT risk management, incident management, resilience testing, ICT third-party risk, information sharing), each with its DORA article. Call wi

• gdpr_breach_decision

  Use when a personal data breach has happened (data lost, stolen, sent to the wrong person, encrypted by ransomware, accessed without authorisation) to decide whether the GDPR requires notifying the supervisory authority within 72 hours (Art. 33) and the people affected (Art. 34),

• gdpr_fine_estimate

  Use for 'how big could a GDPR fine be?' or 'how are GDPR fines calculated?'. Applies step 2 of the EDPB Guidelines 04/2022 method: the Art. 83(4) or 83(5) legal maximum, the starting amount band for the seriousness of the infringement, and the turnover adjustment. Give the seriou

• gdpr_checklist_assessment

  Use to check how far an organisation is with GDPR compliance, or to list what GDPR requires in practice. Call without input to get the 48 checklist items in 8 areas (lawfulness, transparency and rights, minimisation and retention, security, breaches, processors, accountability, i

• gdpr_dpia_screening

  Use when someone plans new processing of personal data (a new system, AI use, monitoring, profiling) and asks whether a data protection impact assessment is required or how risky it is. Applies GDPR Art. 35(3), national lists and the nine WP248 rev.01 criteria, scores necessity a

• privacy_notice_requirements

  Use when writing or checking a privacy policy or privacy notice. Lists every item the GDPR requires with its article, for data collected from the person (Art. 13) or obtained from other sources (Art. 14), when the notice must be given, and the exceptions. Tell it which situations

• data_flow_record_check

  Use when someone maps personal data flows or builds GDPR records of processing activities (ROPA, Art. 30). Give the flows (name, purpose, data categories, recipients, legal basis, retention, transfers); returns, per flow, what an Art. 30 record still lacks, plus the allowed value

• cookie_consent_check

  Use when someone asks whether their cookie banner or cookie consent is compliant in the EU (ePrivacy Art. 5(3) and GDPR consent rules). Call without answers to get the checklist items by area, critical ones marked. Call with yes, partial or no per item to get a score, a complianc

• cra_reporting_check

  Use when a manufacturer of hardware or software sold in the EU learns of an actively exploited vulnerability or a security incident in its product. Applies Art. 14 of the Cyber Resilience Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/2847), in force since 11 September 2026: whether a report is due,

• iso27001_gap_assessment

  Use to check how close an organisation is to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification, or to list the Annex A controls in practice. Call without answers to get 41 control checks in four themes (organizational, people, physical, technological) with their Annex A references. Call with a st

• vendor_risk_assessment

  Use when an organisation evaluates a supplier, SaaS or ICT provider (vendor due diligence, third-party risk, supply chain security under NIS2 Art. 21(2)(d) or DORA). Call without input to get the questions. Call with the vendor profile (type, criticality, data access, regimes) an

• maturity_assessment

  Use to measure an organisation's cybersecurity maturity or to benchmark it against NIST CSF 2.0. Call without answers to get 39 capabilities in the six CSF functions and the 1-5 levels. Call with a level per capability to get the average per function and an overall maturity level

• cyber_risk_score

  Use for a quick view of a small organisation's cyber risk ('how secure are we?', 'what is our cyber risk score?'). Call without answers to get 15 weighted questions on access, data, systems, people, incident response and backups. Call with yes, partial or no per question to get a

• agent_risk_check

  Use when someone asks how risky an AI agent or assistant setup is ('is it safe to let our agent read email and send replies?', 'what are the risks of this agent?'). Call without answers to get 9 questions on what the agent can do and 11 on the controls that limit it. Call with an

• mcp_tools_check

  Use before enabling an MCP server or connecting to an A2A agent ('is this MCP server safe to add?', 'check these tool descriptions'). Pass the server's tools/list response or the agent's Agent Card as document. Returns flags for hidden or manipulative text in descriptions (tool p

• nis2_remediation_plan

  Use after nis2_gap_assessment when the user wants a plan to close their NIS2 gaps. Turns the same answers into every gap with a recommended action, a priority, the NIS2 article and a 30/60/90-day roadmap (governance, risk and incident gaps first). Requires ClevSec Pro.

• dora_remediation_plan

  Use after dora_gap_assessment when the user wants a plan to close their DORA gaps. Turns the same answers into every gap with a recommended action, a priority, the DORA article and a 30/60/90-day roadmap (ICT risk management and incident management first). Requires ClevSec Pro.

• gdpr_remediation_plan

  Use after gdpr_checklist_assessment when the user wants a plan to close their GDPR gaps. Turns the same input into every open item with a recommended action, a priority, the GDPR article and a 30/60/90-day roadmap (lawfulness, records, breach handling and processor contracts firs

• gdpr_dpia_report

  Use after gdpr_dpia_screening when the user needs the DPIA worked out: a risk register linking each high or medium risk to its measures with coverage and indicative residual risk, and every gap (legal basis, special category data, necessity, missing measures, transfers, prior con

• data_flow_review

  Use after data_flow_record_check for a compliance review of each personal data flow: legal basis, special category and children's data, consent and legitimate interest records, retention, international transfer tools and transfer impact assessments, and DPIA need, with an action,

• cookie_consent_fix_plan

  Use after cookie_consent_check when the user wants to fix their cookie consent. Returns every open item with the fix, its legal source (ePrivacy, GDPR, CJEU Planet49, EDPB) and a 30/60/90-day roadmap. Requires ClevSec Pro.

• iso27001_remediation_plan

  Use after iso27001_gap_assessment when the user wants a plan towards ISO/IEC 27001 certification. Turns the same statuses into every gap with a recommended action, a priority, the Annex A control and a 30/60/90-day roadmap (organizational controls first). Requires ClevSec Pro.

• vendor_due_diligence_plan

  Use after vendor_risk_assessment when the user needs to act on a vendor's gaps. Returns every gap with an action, the evidence to request from the vendor, ISO 27001 / GDPR / NIS2 / DORA references and a roadmap (before signing first), plus the contract clauses to include (GDPR Ar

• maturity_improvement_plan

  Use after maturity_assessment when the user wants to raise their maturity. Lists every capability below the target level (3 or 4) with the next action, NIST CSF 2.0 subcategory, NIS2 article and a 30/60/90-day roadmap (govern and identify first). Requires ClevSec Pro.

• cyber_risk_action_plan

  Use after cyber_risk_score when the user wants to reduce their risk. Returns every gap with a recommended action, a priority, NIST CSF 2.0 and NIS2 references and a 30/60/90-day roadmap (MFA, encryption, patching, incident response and backups first). Requires ClevSec Pro.

• mcp_tools_report

  Use after mcp_tools_check when the user wants a review report or to see what changed since approval. Pass document (current tools/list response or Agent Card) and optionally previous (the approved version). Returns every flag with an action, a priority, OWASP and MCP Security Aud

기본 점검i

누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 7일 점검

• ! 주의

  제작자와 저장소 일치

  레지스트리에 소스 저장소가 없어서, 게시자(clevsec.one)와 코드를 맞춰 볼 수 없어요

• … 아직 점검 안 함

  계속 관리되고 있음

  아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

• … 아직 점검 안 함

  라이선스 있음

  아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

• ✓ 통과

  엔드포인트 응답

  156ms 만에 응답(HTTP 200)

• – 해당 없음

  OAuth로 로그인

  로그인 필요 없음

• ✓ 통과

  도구 설명에 숨겨진 지시 없음

  도구 설명 31개를 읽었고, AI에게 보내는 숨겨진 지시는 없었어요

기타 카테고리의 다른 서버와 비교i

• 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 32686개 중 0%보다 스타가 많아요
• 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 32686개 중 93%보다 최근에 레지스트리에 공개됐어요
• 기본 점검 결과가 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 32686개 중 37%와 같거나 더 좋아요

레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.

대안

같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.

카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i

제작자의 README

저장소에서 README를 찾지 못했어요