프로토타입 · 미리 보기: 공식 레지스트리의 모든 서버를 담고 있으며 30분마다 동기화해요. 리뷰와 계정 기능은 다음 단계에서 열려요.
PopNx MCPAI를 쓰는 사람을 위한 MCP 서버 · 쉬운 말로 설명해요

Seven Dpt MCP

제작자: pierreb4버전 0.1.5i★ –i내 컴퓨터에서 실행
레지스트리 이름io.github.pierreb4/seven-dpt-mcp

설치

개요

제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)

Feynman's twelve-problems method as an MCP server: dormant problems + an evoke loop for new tricks.

PopNx MCP의 세 기둥

이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.

할 수 있는 일

이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.

  • 연결 방식: 내 컴퓨터에서 실행
  • 전송 방식: stdio
  • 카테고리: 기타

설치

쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.

설치하기 전에

필요한 것

  • npmNode.js 설치(npx 명령어용)

어떤 앱을 쓰세요?

위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.

Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config를 열고 claude_desktop_config.json에 이 내용을 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "seven-dpt": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "seven-dpt-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "SEVEN_DPT_DB": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요

claude mcp add seven-dpt --env SEVEN_DPT_DB=your-value -- npx -y seven-dpt-mcp

실행하기 전에 빈 값을 채워 주세요.

Cursor에서 열기

또는 설정을 직접 복사하기

프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "seven-dpt": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "seven-dpt-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "SEVEN_DPT_DB": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.

VS Code에서 열기

또는 설정을 직접 복사하기

프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "servers": {
    "seven-dpt": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "seven-dpt-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "SEVEN_DPT_DB": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.

이 서버는 내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는데, ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요. 다른 앱을 고르세요.

선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.

직접 입력할 값

  • SEVEN_DPT_DB env
    Optional path to the JSON store (default: ~/.local/share/seven-dpt/store.json)

이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.

할 수 있는 일

내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 설치하면 AI 앱에 도구 목록이 나타나요.

기본 점검i

누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 7일 점검

  • ✓ 통과

    제작자와 저장소 일치

    레지스트리 이름이 GitHub 계정 pierreb4 기준으로 확인되었고, 이 계정이 저장소를 소유하고 있어요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    계속 관리되고 있음

    아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    라이선스 있음

    아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

  • – 해당 없음

    엔드포인트 응답

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는 서버라 인터넷 엔드포인트가 없어요

  • – 해당 없음

    OAuth로 로그인

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행되며, 대신 로컬 설정을 사용해요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    도구 설명에 숨겨진 지시 없음

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 도구 목록은 인터넷 엔드포인트가 있는 서버에서만 읽을 수 있어요

기타 카테고리의 다른 서버와 비교i

  • 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 18353개 중 0%보다 스타가 많아요
  • 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 18353개 중 19%보다 최근에 레지스트리에 공개됐어요
  • 기본 점검 결과가 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 18353개 중 100%와 같거나 더 좋아요

레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.

자주 묻는 질문

Seven Dpt MCP, 안전한가요?

해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.

어떤 키나 코드가 필요한가요?

레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행되나요, 클라우드에서 실행되나요?

내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. AI 앱이 필요할 때 실행하고, 데이터는 제작자의 서버를 거치지 않아요(서버 자체가 온라인 서비스를 호출하는 경우는 제외).

아직 관리되고 있나요?

GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(0.1.5)은 3개월 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.

어떤 앱에서 쓸 수 있나요?

Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. 내 컴퓨터에 Node.js도 있어야 해요.

대신 쓸 수 있는 건 뭐가 있나요?

같은 카테고리에는: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Date Math

대안

같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.

카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i

Spec Driven Development

제작자: formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행★ 440MIT14개월 전 업데이트
설치

Remote Desktop Commander

제작자: desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

클라우드에서 실행★ 211그저께 업데이트
설치

Date Math

제작자: JowenDelaPena

Date/time math for agents: business days, holidays, time zones, cron, RRULE. 25 free calls/day.

컴퓨터 또는 클라우드오늘 업데이트
설치

제작자의 README

README 열기

제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.

seven-dpt-mcp

A tiny, local MCP server that gives Claude (in any project) a persistent set of long-running problems and a loop for cracking them — Feynman's *twelve favorite problems* method, driven by the tripartite model of inspiration.

  • Feynman's method (via Gian-Carlo Rota): keep ~a dozen problems dormant in mind; every time you meet a new *trick*, test it against all of them.
  • Inspiration = evocation + transcendence + approach motivation (Thrash & Elliot): a stimulus *evokes* a possibility, you *transcend* the problem's current framing, then you're *motivated* to act on it.

The server holds state and scaffolding; the connected model does the thinking — no LLM runs inside the server, no API key.

Tools

ToolPurpose
add_problemAdd a long-running problem to your set (refused past the ~12 cap until you retire/merge something — or pass overCap)
update_problemEdit, retire, solve, or reopen a problem. Closing takes a resolution — why, plus the re-open trigger; a merge is a retirement whose resolution names the absorber
list_problemsSee your open problems
get_problemOne problem + every spark (idea, next step, outcome) — the memory
evokeThe loop. Feed it a trick; returns your problems + a scaffold walking evocation → transcendence → approach
capture_sparkPersist a candidate idea + concrete next step against a problem (+ optional costToOpen — the forward effort estimate — prior — your stated p(works), immutable, for later calibration — and the claim-typing trio: claimType universal/existential-bounded, forbids — one observation the spark rules out — and exhaustion — when to abandon rather than re-park. All write-once)
update_sparkRecord a spark's outcome — status (tried/worked/failed), cost (actual effort spent), value (graded payoff, 0 for a miss). Log failures too; the zero-value outcomes are the signal a background-effort policy is learned from. Can backfill claimType/forbids/exhaustion while unset (write-once: never revises)
wake_statusEvaluate every parked problem/spark's wakeCondition right now — ripeness, progress, per-atom current/target echoes

Storage: ~/.local/share/seven-dpt/store.json (override with SEVEN_DPT_DB). One store, shared by every project = one brain.

Wake conditions (0.1.4)

Retiring a problem parks it with a re-open trigger — but a trigger written in prose is a wait owned by "someone will remember." A `wakeCondition` makes it computable: a small predicate (all/any over atoms like sparkCount, a date gate, fileMatches / fileLines / fileCount on a path, or an explicit manual note) attached when you retire/solve a problem (update_problem), park a spark (update_spark), or capture one born gated (capture_spark). The ambient digest evaluates every condition at session start and surfaces what's ripe (with an act/re-park pointer), what's ripening (with current/target progress), and — loudly — any condition whose source became unreadable: a wake source that vanished must scream, not sit at 0% forever. Everything echoes its aim (prior-ledger.jsonl 12/20), so a wrong path or unit is visible when you arm it, not months later. No auto-reopen: ripeness is surfaced, you decide. --wake prints the full ledger from the CLI.

Claim typing (0.1.5)

A parked spark with a wake condition can *revive* — but nothing says when it may *die*, so an unfalsifiable hope can ride the digest forever. 0.1.5 gives every spark an optional claim-typing trio, all write-once on the same anti-hindsight model as prior:

  • `claimType` — universal ("this always holds") vs existential-bounded ("this holds somewhere, within a stated frame"). A frame-bounded null is not a claim-failure; typing the claim keeps a frame-kill from being read as a lever-kill.
  • `forbids` — one concrete observation the spark rules out. If nothing is forbidden, nothing can refute it, and the spark is a mood, not a claim.
  • `exhaustion` — the retirement predicate, the dual of wakeCondition: the condition under which the spark is abandoned rather than re-parked.

Set them at capture, or backfill later *while unset* (update_spark); revision after the fact is refused with a visible notice — rewriting what a claim forbids after seeing results is the conventionalist stratagem the fields exist to block. ledger_invariants.py flags ORPHANED-EXISTENTIAL sparks (parked with a wake, no exhaustion — can revive but never die), and calibration.py stamps the claimType mix of every scored cohort.

How it bootstraps

On first run (no store file yet), the store seeds itself with seven-dpt's own three open product problems — auto-detection of recurring issues, the background-spend policy, and proactive surfacing. Design decision, made deliberately: the seeds are tool-generic (identical for every install, about the tool rather than about you), so the server dogfoods its own method from minute one and the ambient digest has something to show before you add your own problems. They are ordinary rows in *your* store — edit, replace, or clear them freely; an existing store is never touched. So the moment it runs it is already "taking care of its own problems": while you work on anything else, those sit in context and can be sparked by unrelated discoveries. The *policy* for how/when/how-much to chase background problems is deliberately not coded — it's meant to be learned later from the accumulated spark → outcome history, which is why update_spark exists.

That history is the reward channel: each spark carries a prior (your stated probability-it-works at capture — immutable afterwards, so stated credences can be calibrated against realized outcomes once enough sparks resolve), a costToOpen (the forward effort estimate, set at capture and preserved), a cost (the actual effort, once chased to a verdict), and a value (graded payoff, 0 for a miss). analysis/reservation_value.py turns it into a Pandora's-Box / Gittins reservation-value ranking — but it gates on data sufficiency and refuses to emit numbers until enough resolved sparks (with cost + value, *including failures*) accrue, so the policy is never fit on false precision. A Bayesian companion, analysis/reservation_value_bayes.py, was retired on 2026-10-10 (it is in git history): nothing ever invoked it, and the de-bias map it applied to spark priors was fitted on another program's ledger, where it has the opposite sign to this store's own sparks. analysis/calibration.py is the audit half of the prior loop: it scores stated priors against realized outcomes (reliability table, Brier/skill, drift check) from any two-line JSONL ledger of pre-registered priors + resolutions, and --json persists that ledger's de-bias map and buckets for analysis/self_check.py. No map is applied to spark priors. The store's own reading — resolved sparks' mean stated prior against the share that worked, with a Wilson interval — is one line of the session digest once ten sparks with a prior have resolved, and --priors lists each spark's prior beside its outcome. --split YYYY-MM-DD partitions the curve at a changepoint (a model upgrade re-prices estimates — don't pool across one untested), and a scope stamp reports the claimType mix of scored pairs, since a frame-bounded null scored as a claim-failure is the one bias the audit can't see from numbers alone. analysis/ledger_invariants.py audits the *program* the same ledger records, not any single probe: deterministic invariants for the failure class where every result is locally sound and the project is still wrong — a park-streak check (K straddles-zero verdicts in a row on the primary metric means the instrument, not the ideas, is the suspect), power-at-preregistration (a gate below the banked MDE is unresolvable *before* it runs), channel-liveness stamps, and ORPHANED-EXISTENTIAL (a parked spark with a wake but no exhaustion can revive but never die — unfalsifiable-in-practice spend). It reports its own note-classification coverage, exits 1 on alerts, supports --asof retrodiction, and --json emits ALERT markers a hook or wakeCondition (fileMatches on the output) can gate on.

Install (turn on for all projects)

Via npm (recommended)

Published on npm — no build step. Register it for every project (user scope):

claude mcp add --scope user seven-dpt -- npx -y seven-dpt-mcp
From source (alternative)
npm install && npm run build

Register for every project (user scope). Use an ABSOLUTE node path — hooks and MCP

servers don't source your shell profile, so nvm-style setups need one:

claude mcp add --scope user seven-dpt -- "$(command -v node)" "$(pwd)/dist/index.js"

Then make the problems ambient — merge into ~/.claude/settings.json so every session opens with your dormant problems in context:

{

"hooks": { "SessionStart": [ { "matcher": "startup", "hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "npx -y seven-dpt-mcp --digest", "timeout": 10 }] }, { "matcher": "resume", "hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "npx -y seven-dpt-mcp --digest", "timeout": 10 }] }, { "matcher": "clear", "hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "npx -y seven-dpt-mcp --digest", "timeout": 10 }] } ] } }

(Installed from source instead? Replace each command with an absolute node path + /absolute/path/to/seven-dpt-mcp/dist/index.js --digest — hooks don't source your shell profile, so nvm-style setups need the absolute path.)

(--digest prints nothing when no problems are open; a fresh install prints the three seeded ones — that's the bootstrap working, not noise.)

Validate the idea

  1. Add a few of your own long-running problems — add_problem.
  2. When you hit an interesting technique in any repo, evoke it; watch Claude test it against every problem and reframe the ones that light up.
  3. Let it capture_spark the hits, then update_spark once you've tried them.
  4. Days later, get_problem — if that accumulated trail feels useful, the idea's proven.

Known MVP limits (intentional)

  • JSON file, last-write-wins (fine for one user).
  • evoke matching is done by the connected model, not pre-ranked by embeddings.

License

Apache-2.0 — see LICENSE.

PopNx에게 묻기