프로토타입 · 미리 보기: 공식 레지스트리의 모든 서버를 담고 있으며 30분마다 동기화해요. 리뷰와 계정 기능은 다음 단계에서 열려요.
PopNx MCPAI를 쓰는 사람을 위한 MCP 서버 · 쉬운 말로 설명해요

Sdccdif

제작자: SemanticDataCharter버전 4.1.1i★ –i내 컴퓨터에서 실행
레지스트리 이름io.github.SemanticDataCharter/sdccdif

설치

개요

제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)

CODATA CDIF descriptions of published Semantic Data Charter models; read-only, no account.

PopNx MCP의 세 기둥

이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.

할 수 있는 일

이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.

  • 연결 방식: 내 컴퓨터에서 실행
  • 전송 방식: stdio
  • 카테고리: 기타

설치

쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.

설치하기 전에

  • 기본 점검: 1개 중 1개 통과
  • 내 컴퓨터에서 내 사용자 계정의 권한(파일, 네트워크, 앱)으로 실행돼요.
  • 레지스트리에 입력해야 할 키가 나와 있지 않아요.

필요한 것

  • PyPIPython의 uv 설치(uvx 명령어용)

어떤 앱을 쓰세요?

위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.

Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config를 열고 claude_desktop_config.json에 이 내용을 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sdccdif": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "sdccdif",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요

claude mcp add sdccdif -- uvx sdccdif mcp

Cursor에서 열기

또는 설정을 직접 복사하기

프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sdccdif": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "sdccdif",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.

VS Code에서 열기

또는 설정을 직접 복사하기

프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요

{
  "servers": {
    "sdccdif": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "sdccdif",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.

이 서버는 내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는데, ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요. 다른 앱을 고르세요.

선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.

이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.

할 수 있는 일

내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 설치하면 AI 앱에 도구 목록이 나타나요.

기본 점검i

누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 6일 점검

  • ✓ 통과

    제작자와 저장소 일치

    레지스트리 이름이 GitHub 계정 SemanticDataCharter 기준으로 확인되었고, 이 계정이 저장소를 소유하고 있어요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    계속 관리되고 있음

    아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    라이선스 있음

    아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

  • – 해당 없음

    엔드포인트 응답

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는 서버라 인터넷 엔드포인트가 없어요

  • – 해당 없음

    OAuth로 로그인

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행되며, 대신 로컬 설정을 사용해요

  • … 아직 점검 안 함

    도구 설명에 숨겨진 지시 없음

    내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 도구 목록은 인터넷 엔드포인트가 있는 서버에서만 읽을 수 있어요

기타 카테고리의 다른 서버와 비교i

  • 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 32433개 중 0%보다 스타가 많아요
  • 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 32433개 중 75%보다 최근에 레지스트리에 공개됐어요
  • 기본 점검 결과가 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 32433개 중 100%와 같거나 더 좋아요

레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.

자주 묻는 질문

Sdccdif, 안전한가요?

해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.

어떤 키나 코드가 필요한가요?

레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행되나요, 클라우드에서 실행되나요?

내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. AI 앱이 필요할 때 실행하고, 데이터는 제작자의 서버를 거치지 않아요(서버 자체가 온라인 서비스를 호출하는 경우는 제외).

아직 관리되고 있나요?

GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(4.1.1)은 12일 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.

어떤 앱에서 쓸 수 있나요?

Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. 내 컴퓨터에 Python (uv)도 있어야 해요.

대신 쓸 수 있는 건 뭐가 있나요?

같은 카테고리에는: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Symantec Cloud DLP AIops

대안

같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.

카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i

Spec Driven Development

제작자: formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행★ 440MIT14개월 전 업데이트
설치

Remote Desktop Commander

제작자: desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

클라우드에서 실행★ 211어제 업데이트
설치

Symantec Cloud DLP AIops

제작자: AIops-tools

Governed Symantec Cloud DLP — 14 MCP tools, read-only with audit.

내 컴퓨터에서 실행오늘 업데이트
설치

제작자의 README

README 열기

제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.

sdc_cdif

One Semantic Data Charter model, described in CDIF.

sdccdif reads a published SDC model's package and writes the CDIF JSON-LD that describes the collection of Governed Data Records conforming to it: Core and Discovery for the dataset, Data Description for every leaf of the record, a Codelist for every enumerated leaf, and one sentinel value domain for the reference model's sixteen exceptional values. The output is checked with CDIF's own frame, JSON Schemas, SHACL and conformance validator, at a pinned commit of their validation repository.

1. What this is, and where it came from

The sample document, samples/nhanes-participant/cdif-dm-xy8upneajsb8vdcmnve01g6g.jsonld, describes the records of one published model: NHANES Participant (dm-xy8upneajsb8vdcmnve01g6g) from the FAIR Data Demo, a demographic, examination and laboratory record of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (CDC). The model is public:

  • the catalog record: https://sdcstudio.axius-sdc.com/api/v1/catalog/dm/xy8upneajsb8vdcmnve01g6g/
  • the schema the records conform to: https://sdcstudio.axius-sdc.com/dmlib/dm-xy8upneajsb8vdcmnve01g6g.xsd
  • the Semantic Data Charter: https://semanticdatacharter.com

The writer reads the package (the model's JSON-LD and its schema), the public catalog record and the published schema versions. It needs no account, and it refuses a model whose package was never built: the schema and the JSON-LD are the evidence it describes, and nothing is written that they do not carry.

pip install -e ".[fetch]"

sdccdif write --package samples/nhanes-participant --out cdif.jsonld sdccdif write --ct-id xy8upneajsb8vdcmnve01g6g --save-package pkg/ --out cdif.jsonld # any published model, from the catalog

What the document contains, for the NHANES Participant model:

schema:Datasetthe collection of records conforming to the model: name, description, identifier, URL, dates, language, licence from the model's rights, creator, publisher with a contact point, keywords; and, when the modeler wrote them in the model's Dublin Core, the publisher's name, subject keywords, contributors and coverage (schema:spatialCoverage as a named Place)
schema:publishingPrinciplesthe permanence page: a published model is immutable, a change is a new model naming the one it revised
dcterms:conformsTothe schema, by its published URL with ?sha256= and an spdx:Checksum of the bytes
schema:variableMeasured153 cdi:InstanceVariables, one per leaf of the record in document order, with the path, the library slot as schema:propertyID, the skos:exactMatch concepts as cdif:uses, the XSD datatype, unit, range, a substantive value domain and the shared sentinel domain
cdif:rolethe respondent sequence number is the UnitIdentifier; the governance leaves (audit event, PROV activity and agent) are Attributes qualifying it; everything else is a Measure
cdif:hasPrimaryKeythe unit identifier
67 skos:ConceptSchemesone per enumerated component, each value as skos:notation with its definition and the code it is defined by; a component composed three times is one codelist referenced three times
1 cdif:SentinelValueDomainthe SDC4 exceptional values (NI, MSK, INV, DER, UNC, OTH, NINF, PINF, UNK, ASKR, NASK, QS, TRC, ASKU, NAV, NA) as a skos:ConceptScheme, referenced by every variable
dcat:CatalogRecorddeclares cdif/core/1.1, cdif/discovery/1.1 and cdif/data_description/1.1

2. How to verify it

The tests run CDIF's validators from data/, where their artifacts are copied at the pinned commits (validation 129085c, metadataBuildingBlocks 61f24aa; build/snapshot_cdif.py verifies the pins before copying):

pip install -e ".[dev]"

python -m pytest tests -q

Or run their conformance validator directly on the sample:

cd data/cdif-129085c

python ConformanceValidate.py ../../samples/nhanes-participant/cdif-dm-xy8upneajsb8vdcmnve01g6g.jsonld --source local --frame CDIF-frame-2026.jsonld

Result at the pin: Core SHACL passed; Discovery JSON Schema and SHACL passed; Data Description JSON Schema and SHACL passed; 0 violations; the three declared profiles consistent with the profiles the detector finds in the content. Every codelist node passes the cdifCodelist building block's JSON Schema, rules.shacl and conformance.shacl.

3. What the projection could not say

Left out rather than filled in, because the package does not carry it: a distribution of the records (the records are not public; the model is), temporal coverage, statistics. CDIF marks all of these recommended, not required. The model's own Dublin Core (subject, coverage, publisher, contributors, relation) is read from the schema header and published when the modeler wrote it; SDCStudio's field defaults ("Universal" for coverage, "None" for relation, blanks) read as unset, which is why the NHANES document carries none of them: its modeler left them at the defaults. One recommended item is declared rather than read from the package, and said so here: the publisher's contact point (contact@axius-sdc.com on the sample, in src/sdccdif/data/declared.json; --contact-name and --contact-email override it, and an empty address omits it).

And in the other direction, what the record carries that the description has no place for, stated so a reader knows where to look rather than as a shortcoming of either side:

  • The governance envelope is data in every record. Each Governed Data Record carries its own audit event, PROV activity and PROV agent as leaves, validated with the rest. CDIF's provenance is a property of the dataset. The writer lists those leaves as variables with the Attribute role, so a reader can see they are there; the per-record values live in the records.
  • The schema is bound to each record, not only to the collection. Every record names the schema it was validated against, and the schema never changes after publication. The description can say that once, on the dataset, which is what dcterms:conformsTo with the SHA-256 and schema:publishingPrinciples do.
  • The reason a value is missing is typed in the record. A leaf may carry one of the sixteen exceptional values in place of its value, so a refusal, a value not asked for, and a value masked for privacy are different facts. CDIF's sentinel value domain describes the set; which reason applies, and where, is in the record.

4. What we learned about the CDIF profiles

Implementer's notes from building this against the artifacts at the pins above. They describe how the artifacts behave, so the next implementer spends the day on their own document rather than on these.

  • The frame embeds every referenced node. CDIF-frame-2026.jsonld carries @embed: @always throughout, so a node referenced from many places (here, one sentinel domain referenced by 153 variables) is repeated at every reference in the framed tree. Harmless for validation; the framed document is many times the size of the source. Sibling @graph nodes that are not a schema:Dataset (the codelists) do not appear in the framed output and are validated separately against the codelist building block.
  • `cdif:role: Attribute` requires `cdif:qualifies`. The Data Description SHACL asks every attribute to name the variable it qualifies, following DDI-CDI. A record-level attribute has the record's unit identifier to point at, which is what this writer does.
  • The conformance detector gates Data Description on the instance-variable rules. detect_conformance.py reports a profile as present only when its per-class SHACL passes, so a document that declares Data Description and fails those rules is reported as over-claiming the profile rather than as failing it. Reading the SHACL section first explains the conformance section.
  • The local conformance map has JSON Schemas for Discovery, Data Description and Complete. Core is checked by SHACL only (no schema mapped is the expected line), and the Codelist profile has no entry, so a codelist cannot be declared on the catalog record and checked through ConformanceValidate.py; the building block's own schema and rules check it directly.
  • `cdif:physicalDataType` takes a string or a reference, and CDIF's own examples use both ("xsd:integer" and a full XML Schema URL). The string form is used here.
  • IRI-shaped values must be IRI references. schema:propertyID and schema:additionalType written as strings that look like IRIs or CURIEs are SHACL violations; {"@id": ...} is the accepted form. Plain labels remain strings.
  • The SKOS prefix is not in the frame's context, so framed output shows full SKOS IRIs until the validator's compaction step adds it. Expected; noted so the intermediate output does not alarm anyone.

MCP server

sdccdif is also an MCP server, registered as io.github.SemanticDataCharter/sdccdif, so an assistant that can read a published model with sdcreader can ask for its CDIF description. One tool, write_cdif, over the same function the CLI calls; stdio; read-only apart from the document it returns; no account; no tool takes a URL (the catalog host is fixed at start with --host). The protocol scaffold is sdcreader.mcp, shared by every SDC projection server.

uvx sdccdif mcp            # or: sdccdif-mcp, or sdccdif mcp

Layout

  • The model's package is read with sdcreader (load_package, fetch_package, read_model): the record tree, its leaves, the enumerated values with their codes, the model's Dublin Core with SDCStudio's defaults as unset. The package format is documented there, once.
  • src/sdccdif/: cdif.py (the JSON-LD), cli.py, data/sdc4-exceptional-values.json (the sixteen exceptional values, extracted from the SDC4 reference model schema).
  • data/cdif-129085c/: CDIF's context, frame, JSON Schemas, SHACL, conformance map and validators. data/mbb-61f24aa/: the cdifCodelist building block and the three per-class rules the detector gates on.
  • samples/nhanes-participant/: the model's package as fetched and the document written from it.
  • build/snapshot_cdif.py: re-creates data/ from read-only clones of the CDIF repositories at the pinned commits.

Licences

Apache-2.0 (see LICENSE, NOTICE). The CDIF artifacts in data/ keep their own licences: the validation repository is CC0; the building blocks are CC BY 4.0, CODATA and the Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework.

PopNx에게 묻기