Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)
Manage an Ankr RPC account: API keys, usage, allowlists, billing, teams. Sign in with OAuth.
이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.
이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.
쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.
필요한 것
어떤 앱을 쓰세요?
위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.
웹, 데스크톱, 모바일의 Claude에서 쓸 수 있어요:
https://mcp.ankr.com/mcp터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요
claude mcp add --transport http agent-rpc-management https://mcp.ankr.com/mcp프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"agent-rpc-management": {
"url": "https://mcp.ankr.com/mcp"
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"servers": {
"agent-rpc-management": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.ankr.com/mcp"
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요:
https://mcp.ankr.com/mcp메뉴 이름은 요금제나 시기에 따라 조금 다를 수 있어요.
선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.
이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.
서버가 도구 목록을 보여 주기 전에 로그인을 요구해요.
누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 7일 점검
레지스트리 이름이 GitHub 계정 w3tech 기준으로 확인되었고, 이 계정이 저장소를 소유하고 있어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
158ms 만에 응답(HTTP 401)
OAuth 로그인을 지원한다고 밝혀서, AI 앱이 로그인 화면으로 안내해 줘요
아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트를 점검할 때 도구 목록을 읽어요
레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.
해당하는 기본 점검 3개 중 3개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.
레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.
제작자의 클라우드에서 실행돼요. 설치 없이 인터넷으로 연결하지만, 보내는 내용은 제작자의 서버를 거쳐요.
GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(0.2.8)은 4일 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. URL로 연결되기 때문에, 원격 MCP 서버를 지원하는 앱(예: 개발자 모드의 ChatGPT)에서도 쓸 수 있어요.
같은 카테고리에는: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, 御府和田玉 在售作品查询
같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.
카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Live in-stock Hetian jade from Yufu, Shanghai: prices, monthly price guide, book a viewing.
제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.
A Model Context Protocol server that gives AI agents token-efficient access to blockchain data through Ankr RPC.
Reads go out with the TORPC Accept-Token-Tier: 2 header. Tier 1 already renames the fields, turns hex into decimal and drops the service fields (logsBloom, cumulativeGasUsed, header roots). Tier 2 adds the ABI decode on top, so contract calls and event logs come back as named arguments.
A live run over 21 methods and 25 Ethereum mainnet blocks, token-weighted and counted with o200k_base over the full HTTP body, came out 48.4% smaller at tier 2 and 35.3% smaller at tier 1. Decode-heavy reads save the most: eth_getTransactionByHash 69.0%, eth_getTransactionReceipt 64.5%, eth_getBlockReceipts 60.3%, the block methods 40.4%, eth_getLogs 28.9%; scalar reads save 9–19%. Per-method figures: live-token-savings-2026-07-17.md.
Get a free API key at ankr.com/rpc.
The server runs at https://mcp.ankr.com/rpc. Send your key as the x-ankr-api-key header (or Authorization: Bearer ); each request carries the caller's own key, and the server holds no credential of yours.
{
"mcpServers": { "ankr-agent-rpc": { "url": "https://mcp.ankr.com/rpc", "headers": { "x-ankr-api-key": " " } } } }
{
"mcpServers": { "ankr-agent-rpc": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@w3tech.io/agent-rpc-mcp"], "env": { "ANKR_API_KEY": " " } } } }
That JSON goes in your client's MCP config: Claude Desktop (claude_desktop_config.json), Cursor, Windsurf, or any other MCP client. Cursor also accepts the command form:
env ANKR_API_KEY=<YOUR_KEY> npx -y @w3tech.io/agent-rpc-mcp
Raw RPC, TORPC tier 2
| Tool | What it answers |
|---|---|
getTransaction | transaction + receipt by hash, ABI-decoded |
getLogs | event logs, decoded; wide block ranges are chunk-scanned and paged |
getBlock | block header, optionally with decoded transactions |
Indexed and mixed
| Tool | What it answers |
|---|---|
getBalances | native coin + ERC-20 balances with USD |
getAccountBalance | balances across many chains at once |
getWalletActivity | an address's transaction history, paged |
getNFTs | NFTs held by an address |
getTokenHolders | holders of an ERC-20, paged |
getTokenPrice | USD price with chain, asset and as_of provenance |
getTokenPriceHistory | historical price series for a token |
getInteractions | which chains an address has touched, cross-chain |
resolveContract | is-contract, best-effort ERC-20 metadata, EIP-1967 proxy |
searchChain | resolve a tx/block hash, an address, or a block number |
expandResult | continue any paged result from its cursor |
Discovery and escape hatch
| Tool | What it answers |
|---|---|
listChains | supported chains, max TORPC tier, indexer availability |
describeMethods | the param shape and a worked example per JSON-RPC method, plus whether your key may call it on that chain |
rpcCall | any read method the routed tools do not cover |
Sui
Sui is not an EVM chain and is not reached through the JSON-RPC proxy at all: a Sui call goes out over gRPC. getBalances, getBlock, getTransaction, getWalletActivity, getLogs and rpcCall take chain: "sui" and route themselves — getLogs reads Move events over a checkpoint range, filtered by emitting package or module, event type and sender. resolveContract and searchChain are built from eth_* calls Sui has never had and refuse there, naming the tool that answers instead. A Move event row is {contract, event, args}, the same shape an EVM tier-2 log has — but its args arrives at tier 0, decoded by the node rather than from an ABI, so on this path it is not evidence of a tier.
Eight tools serve what Sui has and an EVM chain does not:
| Tool | What it answers |
|---|---|
suiGetObjects | Move objects by id, batched, with their decoded fields |
suiListOwnedObjects | every object an address owns, paged, filterable by Move type |
suiListDynamicFields | tables, bags and dynamic object fields under one object's UID |
suiGetPackage | the modules a published Move package declares |
suiGetFunction | one Move function's signature |
suiResolveName | a SuiNS name to its address, or an address to its name |
suiSimulateTransaction | what a transaction would do, run against current state, never submitted |
suiWatchEvents | Move events from the executed tip on, polled from a resumable cursor |
That is the whole set: 25 tools.
rpcCall will and will not dorpcCall is a read and data escape hatch, never a wallet. It is a write denylist, not a read allowlist: it refuses transaction broadcast and signing, transaction _building_, node and dev-node administration, mutating verbs, and the node-operation half of geth's debug_* namespace — on every chain family — and forwards everything else.
It therefore keeps no list of permitted reads. Which reads exist is decided per chain by the endpoint's blockchain schema and by what your tenant may call, so a forwarded read can still come back refused (Method disabled, reason: restricted by blockchain schema). That refusal is the authoritative answer; listChains reports coverage.
Sign and send transactions with your own wallet or signer.
Two fields decide how to read every result, and an agent that skips them will misread output that is technically correct.
`_meta.tier` — the TORPC tier is negotiated per call and is not guaranteed. On the proxy path a response comes back at tier 0 (raw, undecoded, no args) when it is above the proxy's compression budget, and also when the method is one the proxy does not compress at all, such as eth_call, eth_getCode and eth_getStorageAt. Every successful response carries the tier actually applied in _meta.tier, so check it before looking for decoded fields; an error result carries _meta.error_code instead and no tier at all. Some tools additionally report tier_degraded: true in the body, with a note on how to narrow the request, when they asked for tier 2 on your behalf and got less. Not all of them do, so _meta.tier is the field to rely on. _meta.tier_source says who applied the tier, and the shape rule above is the proxy's alone: on the Sui gRPC path (tier_source: "local") a Move event row carries contract, event and args at tier 0, because the node decodes a Move struct itself.
Decoded amounts are raw base units, with no decimals applied. args.value: "41695680" on a 6-decimal token is 41.69568, not 41 million. Read the token's decimals with resolveContract before reporting a human number.
_meta.token_count is a real o200k_base count of the emitted text, not a chars/4 estimate. It is exact up to 256 KB of emitted text, which covers every display-capped response; above that it is extrapolated and the response carries _meta.token_count_estimated: true. Responses are minified JSON, so a model with a different tokenizer sees a similar but not identical number.
Tool inputs are strict: an unknown argument is rejected with a validation error rather than silently dropped, so a misspelled argument name is reported instead of ignored. Block numbers above 2^53 must be passed as strings, because a JSON number that large is not exact.
| Tier | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 0 | passthrough — standard JSON-RPC |
| 1 | field rename, hex → decimal, and the service fields dropped: logsBloom, cumulativeGasUsed, contractAddress, type, the header roots |
| 2 | tier 1 plus the ABI decode — each log becomes {contract, event, args}, calldata becomes a decoded function with named args |
Negotiation is by header: Accept-Token-Tier: 0|1|2 on the request, Token-Tier on the response. The proxy applies the requested tier only while the response stays inside its compression budget, and that budget is internal to the proxy — so this server never predicts the tier, it detects the applied one and reports it.
On a JSON-RPC batch that header describes the array, not any one element: a response array carries a single Token-Tier, and its value is the minimum tier applied across the elements. v1 defines no per-element tier signal, elements may sit above that floor, and a client reads each element's own tier from the shape the proxy left on it — renamed fields and decimal strings for tier 1, event/args for tier 2 — rather than from the header. So the header is a floor and a signal that a transform was applied; which methods reach tier 2 is declared per method in the descriptor at https://mcp.ankr.com/.well-known/torpc.json, which also ships in the npm package at static/.well-known/torpc.json.
Specification: w3tech/torpc, released under CC0-1.0, with the TORPC docs page as the narrative version. The reference decoder is published as @w3tech.io/torpc-decoder (Apache-2.0); its source and the benchmark harness live in w3tech/torpc-js, under codec/. The EVM tier-1 and tier-2 rules are normative in the spec today; the conformance suite is a scaffold, so no implementation, this one included, claims conformance yet.
Two machine-readable documents describe this deployment. Both are public, carry no credential, and are readable cross-origin.
| Document | Served at |
|---|
앞부분만 보여 드려요. 나머지는 저장소에서 읽어 보세요