Context7
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)
Local persistent memory for AI agents with recall, search, forgetting, and encrypted storage.
이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.
이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.
쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.
필요한 것
어떤 앱을 쓰세요?
위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config를 열고 claude_desktop_config.json에 이 내용을 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"warm": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"writerslogic-warm-mcp"
]
}
}
}터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요
claude mcp add warm -- npx -y writerslogic-warm-mcp프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"warm": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"writerslogic-warm-mcp"
]
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"servers": {
"warm": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"writerslogic-warm-mcp"
]
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
이 서버는 내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는데, ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요. 다른 앱을 고르세요.
선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.
이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 설치하면 AI 앱에 도구 목록이 나타나요.
누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 7일 점검
레지스트리 이름이 GitHub 계정 writerslogic 기준으로 확인되었고, 이 계정이 저장소를 소유하고 있어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되는 서버라 인터넷 엔드포인트가 없어요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행되며, 대신 로컬 설정을 사용해요
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. 도구 목록은 인터넷 엔드포인트가 있는 서버에서만 읽을 수 있어요
레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.
해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.
레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.
내 컴퓨터에서 실행돼요. AI 앱이 필요할 때 실행하고, 데이터는 제작자의 서버를 거치지 않아요(서버 자체가 온라인 서비스를 호출하는 경우는 제외).
GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(0.1.5)은 7일 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. 내 컴퓨터에 Node.js, Python (uv)도 있어야 해요.
같은 카테고리에는: Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.
카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.
WritersLogic Adaptive Retention & Memory.
Hybrid search, graph indexing, and vector-symbolic memory.
Local memory for agents and apps: full-text and vector search, a memory API and a vector-symbolic fact store in one embeddable Rust engine that makes no network calls.
Website · Docs · Get started · Standards and provenance · Results · Capabilities · Limits · Contribute
WARM is a Rust library that stores text, vectors and facts in a directory on your machine and finds them again. It ships with Node.js bindings, C, WASM and UniFFI bindings, an HTTP server with a Python client, and an MCP server. There are no service calls, no telemetry and no model downloads unless you turn on a feature that asks for one.
| Capability | What you get |
|---|---|
| Document search | Chunking, stemmed BM25 over blocked postings, Boolean and phrase queries, hybrid fusion with embeddings you supply, metadata filters, byte offsets |
| Vector index | Graph index with a memory-mapped vertex file, an updatable delta for inserts and deletes, optional query-aware routing trained on sample queries |
| Memory API | remember, recall, forget and explain with time validity and supersession; conversation memory with source provenance |
| Storage | Atomic replace and delete, crash-safe journal and checkpoints, verified compaction, one writer per store |
| Security | Optional AES-256-GCM storage encryption with documented coverage and limits, signed audit log, COSE/SCITT provenance |
| Vector-symbolic layer | Sparse hypervectors with bind, bundle and permute, triples with multi-hop queries, Hopfield cleanup |
| You are building | What you get |
|---|---|
| An agent or assistant that needs memory | A memory API with forgetting that removes facts from the store, and an MCP server for editors and agent hosts |
| A local-first or offline app | Embedded search and storage in one directory, with no server process and optional encryption |
| A service that needs vector or text search | warm-server over HTTP with tenants and scoped keys, or the library in-process |
| Research on vector-symbolic memory | The bind/bundle algebra, meaning memory and capacity experiments with their result files |
Every row links to the committed file it comes from. These are single machines and stated protocols, not a substitute for testing your own data.
| Result | Conditions | Source file |
|---|---|---|
| Bemula forgetting score 0.322; best published row 0.310 (LangMem) | Full split: 50 dialogues, 135 forget requests. Agent and judge both deepseek-v4-flash-0731 through OpenRouter pinned to DeepSeek, temperature 0; the judge snapshot is inferred from the authors' run metadata. Recall k=5 hybrid with text-embedding-3-small. Compared with the paper's published DeepSeek rows; a same-day rerun of the suite's naive RAG baseline scored 0.075. One run. | bemula_v1.json |
| LongMemEval dev 89.75 of 100 correct (mean of 4 runs, range 87 to 93) | Official generation and judge prompts, gpt-4o-2024-08-06 as reader and judge, top 10 context. Retrieval is the reference turn ranking over cached Qwen3 scores, not native conversation-memory recall. k was chosen on dev; there is no held-out result. | longmemeval_official_dev_summary.json |
| VIBE llama-128-ip strict recall@100 up to 0.99687 at 1,457 QPS | Official test queries, one thread, query-aware graph (ef=512). Neither frozen RoarGraph configuration reached 0.99. Behind at 0.95 and 0.99 QPS (see below). | query_aware_graph_v1/README.md |
| VIBE yi-128-ip at recall 0.95: 3,214 QPS against 1,953 (MLANN RF80) | Same protocol; compared only with the frozen RoarGraph and MLANN configurations measured there. Recall 0.99 was not reached. | query_aware_graph_v1/README.md |
| SIFT-1M at recall@10 0.95: 23,918 QPS against hnswlib 8,125 (2.94x, interval 2.75 to 3.01); 3.09x at 0.99, 1.40x faster build, 1.83x less serving RSS, 3.74x faster cold start | Core Ultra 9 185H at 4b7a849f, 10,000 queries issued one at a time from one client thread, index built with 8 threads; WARM through the Rust API, hnswlib through its Python binding; Bonferroni-adjusted bootstrap intervals | heavy-ann-sift-...-185h-22c-27g.json |
| BM25 search on SciFact, NFCorpus and the memory corpus: 1.66x to 2.00x the single-thread QPS of the fastest of tantivy 0.27, Lucene 10.6 and SQLite FTS5, with 1.69x to 2.91x less serving memory and 3.1x to 5.7x faster cold start, at tied nDCG@10 | Two machines (Core Ultra 9 185H at 4b7a849f, Modal 8 vCPU at 7ba2d4fe, same engine source), 5 and 3 interleaved serve rounds, Bonferroni-adjusted bootstrap intervals exclude parity for every win. Lexical only, one chunk per document | COMPARISON.md, standard-text-beir-scifact-...-185h-22c-27g.json |
| SciFact nDCG@10 hybrid 0.729, above its own BM25 (0.688) and dense (0.645) | 5,183 documents, 300 queries, MiniLM embeddings supplied by the harness. NFCorpus: 0.355 against 0.323 and 0.317. | public_scifact.json, public_nfcorpus.json |
| Result | Conditions | Source file |
|---|---|---|
| ann-benchmarks at recall 0.95: sift 2,819 QPS against faiss-ivfpqfs 3,788 (0.74x); glove 1,019 against ScaNN 1,535 (0.66x) | Official ann-benchmarks runner, each run pinned to one CPU, AVX2 host | ann_benchmarks_harness_wl02_v1.json |
| VIBE llama-128-ip QPS: 24.6% behind RoarGraph at recall 0.95, 54.8% behind MLANN RF80 at 0.99 | One thread, official test queries | query_aware_graph_v1/README.md |
| SIFT-1M index file 1,389 MiB against hnswlib's 752 (0.54x, no interval); peak build RSS 0.94x of hnswlib's | Same run as the SIFT-1M row above | docs/benchmarks/GAPS.md |
| BEIR FiQA (57,600 documents) single-thread BM25 QPS: 1,269 against Lucene 10.6's 1,625 (0.78x); p50 and p99 latency also behind | Core Ultra 9 185H at 4b7a849f, 5 interleaved serve rounds; serving memory (1.26x less than SQLite FTS5) and cold start (2.37x faster than tantivy) still win | standard-text-beir-fiqa-...-185h-22c-27g.json |
| Text ingest: peak build memory 1.1x to 2.1x SQLite FTS5's on every corpus; ingest time behind SQLite FTS5 on SciFact, NFCorpus and memory (0.46x to 0.97x), tied on FiQA | Same runs, both machines | docs/benchmarks/GAPS.md |
| glove-100-angular with the sparse vector path: recall@10 0.252 at 33.7 QPS against FAISS HNSW 0.832 at 4,111 QPS | One thread, Apple M4; the sparse path is experimental | public_glove-100-angular.json |
Method, intervals and every loss: docs/benchmarks and the benchmarks pages.
_Generated from benchmarks/results/competitive/ by warm-bench table; method and caveats in docs/benchmarks/COMPARISON.md. W = WARM ahead (95% interval excludes parity), T = tie, L = a comparator is ahead, - = no verdict (unpinned source revision, no interval, or not comparable). Rows are compared only within one machine._
| Dataset | Machine | Metric | WARM | Best other | Advantage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sift-128-euclidean | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | QPS @ recall@10 >= 0.95 (QPS) | 23,918 | hnswlib 8,125 | 2.94x | W |
| sift-128-euclidean | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | p99 latency @ 0.95 (us) | 97 | hnswlib 251 | 2.60x | W |
| sift-128-euclidean | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | Build time (s) | 121.44 | hnswlib 170.02 | 1.40x | W |
| sift-128-euclidean | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | RSS, serving (MiB) | 490 | hnswlib 898 | 1.83x | W |
| sift-128-euclidean | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | Index size (MiB) | 1,389.1 | hnswlib 751.8 | 0.54x | - |
| beir:fiqa | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | nDCG@10 | 0.2654 | SQLite FTS5 0.2678 | 0.99x | T |
| beir:fiqa | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | QPS (single thread) (QPS) | 1,269 | Apache Lucene 10.6.0 (JVM) 1,625 | 0.78x | L |
| beir:fiqa | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | p99 latency (us) | 1,828 | Apache Lucene 10.6.0 (JVM) 1,486 | 0.81x | L |
| beir:fiqa | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | Ingest/build time (s) | 1.55 | SQLite FTS5 1.44 | 0.93x | T |
| beir:fiqa | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | Peak RSS, serving (MiB) | 31 | SQLite FTS5 39 | 1.26x | W |
| beir:fiqa | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | On-disk size (MiB) | 9.7 | Apache Lucene 10.6.0 (JVM) 12.1 | 1.25x | W |
| memory | modal-x86_64-8vcpu-32g | nDCG@10 | 0.4561 | Apache Lucene 10.6.0 (JVM) 0.4627 | 0.99x | T |
| memory | modal-x86_64-8vcpu-32g | QPS (single thread) (QPS) | 4,138 | tantivy 2,185 | 1.89x | W |
| memory | modal-x86_64-8vcpu-32g | p99 latency (us) | 533 | tantivy 798 | 1.50x | W |
| memory | modal-x86_64-8vcpu-32g | Ingest/build time (s) | 1.91 | SQLite FTS5 1.75 | 0.92x | L |
| memory | modal-x86_64-8vcpu-32g | Peak RSS, serving (MiB) | 17 | SQLite FTS5 41 | 2.42x | W |
| memory | modal-x86_64-8vcpu-32g | On-disk size (MiB) | 3.5 | Apache Lucene 10.6.0 (JVM) 10.3 | 2.92x | W |
| memory | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | nDCG@10 | 0.4561 | Apache Lucene 10.6.0 (JVM
앞부분만 보여 드려요. 나머지는 저장소에서 읽어 보세요