MCP YouTube Transcript
An MCP server retrieving transcripts of YouTube videos
제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)
DMARC analytics for AI assistants: SPF/DKIM, compliance, anomalies, p=reject readiness, onboarding.
이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.
이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.
쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.
Authorization비밀로 표시된 값은 내 계정의 열쇠예요. 절대 다른 사람과 공유하거나 채팅에 붙여 넣지 마세요.
필요한 것
어떤 앱을 쓰세요?
위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.
이 주소는 요청 header에 키가 필요한데, 커넥터 추가 메뉴에서는 넣을 수 없어요. 대신 Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code를 쓰세요.
터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요
claude mcp add --transport http dmarkoff https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp --header 'Authorization: your-value'실행하기 전에 빈 값을 채워 주세요.
프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"dmarkoff": {
"url": "https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "your-value"
}
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"servers": {
"dmarkoff": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "your-value"
}
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
이 주소는 요청 header에 키가 필요한데, 커넥터 추가 메뉴에서는 넣을 수 없어요. 대신 Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code를 쓰세요.
선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.
Authorization 비밀 필수 HTTP header이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.
아직 이 서버의 도구 목록을 읽지 않았어요. 엔드포인트는 차례대로 돌아가며 점검해요.
누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 6일 점검
게시자(dmarkoff.com)가 저장소 소유자(dmarcoff)가 아니에요. 다른 사람이 등록했을 수 있어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트는 차례대로 돌아가며 점검해요
아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트는 차례대로 돌아가며 점검해요
아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트를 점검할 때 도구 목록을 읽어요
레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.
해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 0개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.
입력해야 할 값: Authorization
제작자의 클라우드에서 실행돼요. 설치 없이 인터넷으로 연결하지만, 보내는 내용은 제작자의 서버를 거쳐요.
GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(1.5.0)은 6일 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. URL로 연결되기 때문에, 원격 MCP 서버를 지원하는 앱(예: 개발자 모드의 ChatGPT)에서도 쓸 수 있어요.
같은 카테고리에는: MCP YouTube Transcript, Google Analytics MCP, BibiGPT YouTube Video Summarizer
같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.
카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i
An MCP server retrieving transcripts of YouTube videos
GA4 MCP server for AI agents: schema discovery, server-side aggregation, analysis-ready defaults.
AI video summarizer: summarize and transcribe YouTube, Bilibili, TikTok and podcast videos.
제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.
DMARC analytics inside your AI assistant.
DMARKOFF MCP connects your DMARC monitoring data to AI assistants — Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Windsurf — through the Model Context Protocol. Instead of opening a dashboard and building filters, you ask a question and get an answer with real numbers behind it.
Endpoint: https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp Requires: an active DMARKOFF account and an API key from app.dmarkoff.com/account/mcp
*"Which domains dropped in compliance over the last 14 days?"*
The AI checks health across all your projects and surfaces the ones that changed — ranked by how much.
*"Why is SPF failing on example.com? Who's the problem sender?"*
The AI checks return paths, finds the sending source (say, SendGrid using its own bounce domain instead of yours), and tells you what to fix.
*"Anything unusual in email traffic compared to last week?"*
The AI compares the last fully reported day against the 14 days before it — compliance rate, unknown sender volume, message counts. The kind of check most teams skip because setting it up manually takes too long.
*"Can example.com go to p=reject yet?"*
The AI reads DMARKOFF's readiness plan for the domain and gives you its verdict. It names the senders that still need DKIM and where to set it up, the unknown sources you have to confirm are not yours, and the exact record to publish once nothing holds the step. Tell it which senders are yours, and it records that for the plan. Before it takes out a sender the plan counts as your own, it asks you.
https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcpclaude (any value)Works on Free (1 custom connector limit), Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise.
Click + in the chat window → Connectors → Manage Connectors → Add custom connector, paste the URL, complete the OAuth flow.
Or edit the config file (~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json on macOS):
{
"mcpServers": { "dmarkoff": { "command": "npx", "args": [ "mcp-remote", "https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp", "--header", "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" ] } } }
claude mcp add --transport http dmarkoff https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp \
--header "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"
Settings → Tools & MCP → Add new MCP server, select Streamable HTTP, enter the URL.
Or edit ~/.cursor/mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": { "dmarkoff": { "url": "https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp", "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" } } } }
Enable Developer Mode, then go to Settings → Apps → Create App:
https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcpChatGPT registers its own OAuth client with the server, then opens a DMARKOFF page where you paste your API key.
Edit ~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": { "dmarkoff": { "serverUrl": "https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp", "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" } } } }
Note: Windsurf uses
serverUrl, noturl.
→ [Full connection guide for all clients](docs/connect.md)
Show me an overview of all my DMARC projects
Which domains have Critical severity right now?
Why is SPF failing on example.com? Which senders are the problem?
Are there anomalies in email traffic over the last 24 hours?
Show me source details for example.com grouped by ISP — only rows where SPF is failing
We publish p=reject on example.com — why did some mail still get delivered?
Gmail is throttling us on example.com. What are they actually complaining about?
Our SPF record is at 10 lookups — which includes still carry mail and which can go?
Compliance on example.com dropped last week. Did the DMARC or SPF record change?
Yesterday's Google report for example.com is missing. Is it late, or is something wrong?
Can example.com move to p=reject? What's holding it?
Klaviyo is ours, and the unknown host sending as example.com is not. Record that for the plan.
Live DNS checks — these work for any domain, monitored or not:
Check the SPF record for example.com — are there too many DNS lookups?
What DMARC policy does example.com have right now?
Look up the DKIM key for selector "google" on example.com
Onboarding a new domain — the assistant registers it and hands you the exact TXT record to publish:
Add example.com to my project and tell me what to put in DNS
We already have DMARC on example.com — add our reporting address without touching the rest of the record
I published the record for example.com. Will its reports reach my project?
Analytics (require API key)
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
projects_overview | Summary across all projects: domain counts, three compliance rates, severity breakdown |
list_domains | Filter domains by severity, search query, payment status; pagination |
get_domain_full_data | Full diagnostic: DMARC/SPF/DKIM records, stats, timeline, trends, and the same numbers over the previous period — start here |
get_domain_stats | Compliance percentages for a custom date range |
get_domain_timeline | Day-by-day message counts and auth results |
get_domain_activity_health | Per-day SPF/DKIM/DMARC severity vs 14-day baseline — detect when and why things changed |
get_domain_senders | Top sending sources broken down by known ESPs, unknown, forwarded — per provider or per sending domain, with each sending domain's place in the readiness plan |
get_domain_source_details | Per-record detail grouped by IP, ISP, hostname, reporter or individual report, with filters — and how long each reporter takes to send its reports |
get_domain_anomaly_report | Last settled day (2 days ago, UTC) vs the 14 days before it — flags compliance drops, volume drops, days without reports, reports that stopped and mail sent as a parked domain; excluded and unpaid domains are not judged on volume |
get_geo_sources | Top 100 sending locations with compliance stats |
get_domain_detail | DMARC record text, policy, health status per dimension, errors, name servers |
get_spf_records | SPF return paths, lookup count, errors, pass/fail volume per source |
get_dkim_records | DKIM selectors, signing domains, pass/fail volume per source |
get_record_history | Past versions of a DMARC, SPF or DKIM record with what changed between checks — when did this break |
get_policy_overrides | Why receivers did not enforce your policy: ARC, forwarding, sampling, local rules |
get_smtp_rejections | Mail throttled or rejected at SMTP time, by reason — Gmail's 421/550 codes explained |
get_spf_usage | Which SPF mechanisms actually carry mail, and which senders your record misses — for lookup-limit clean-ups |
get_enforcement_status | DMARKOFF's readiness plan for a domain: whether it can move to quarantine or reject (or first take pct off), what holds it, which sources to confirm, and the record to publish |
Live DNS (API key, but no monitored project)
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
dns_check_spf | Current SPF record, what receivers evaluate it to (ok, permerror and so on), parsed include tree and lookup count |
dns_check_dmarc | Current DMARC policy from DNS. With a project, whether the record sends reports to it |
dns_check_dkim | DKIM public key for a given selector |
dns_check_txt | All TXT records with type classification — including spf-ignored, a record that looks like SPF but receivers do not read |
generate_dmarc_record | The DMARC record a domain should publish, merged on top of what is already in DNS and repaired where the checker rejects it, keeping the policy in force, with a list of what changes. With a project, adds your reporting address to rua |
Onboarding (requires API key and owner access to the project)
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
add_domain | Adds up to 20 domains to a project and returns the DMARC record to publish for each. Safe to repeat: it says where a domain already is |
Source decisions (requires API key and owner access to the project, or a shared project whose owner lets you manage sources)
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
set_source_decision | Records your call on a sending source (ours, not ours, or ignore) for the readiness plan, or clears it. Asks before taking out a source the plan counts among your own senders |
Every tool is read-only (readOnlyHint: true per MCP spec) except two. add_domain creates domains. It never updates or deletes anything, and each non-parked domain it adds consumes a paid domain slot on your plan. set_source_decision saves, changes or clears your decision on one sending source of a domain, or confirms that a source you took out stays out. It cannot add or remove domains, change your DNS or touch report data. Taking out one of the plan's own senders is not saved until you confirm, and each change is logged with the API key as its author. The tool reference lists which sources that check covers.
→ [Full tool reference with parameters](docs/tools.md)
add_domain creates domains in a project you own. set_source_decision records your decision on a sending source in a project you own, or one shared with you to manage sources. Its description tells the assistant to use it only at your request, and the server does not take out a source the plan counts among your own senders until you confirm. Every other tool is read-only. No tool deletes domains or report data, and none changes your DNSDNS checks tell you SPF is failing. DMARKOFF MCP tells you which specific sender is causing the failure, how many messages it affected over the last two weeks, and what the fix is. That data comes from your aggregate reports — the actual traffic — not just what's published in DNS.
It also answers the questions that come after: whether the problem is new (every domain report carries the previous period beside the current one), what a record looked like before someone edited it, why a receiver ignored the policy you published, and which parts of an oversized SPF record are still earning their DNS lookups.
When you want to tighten the policy, it reads DMARKOFF's own verdict on whether a domain can go to quarantine or reject. That verdict comes from the plan behind the policy recommendation in the DMARKOFF app and the policy-upgrade email, so the assistant and DMARKOFF give you the same answer.
Tools don't appear in the client → Confirm your client supports Streamable HTTP (not just SSE). → Some clients need a full restart after config changes.
401 Unauthorized → Check your API key at app.dmarkoff.com/account/mcp.
**"No proj
앞부분만 보여 드려요. 나머지는 저장소에서 읽어 보세요