Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
제작자가 쓴 설명(영어 원문)
Check the factual claims in a draft or an answer: a quick verdict, or a deep check with sources.
이 세 가지는 절대 하나의 점수로 합치지 않아요. 의견, 측정, 인기는 서로 다른 것이니까요.
이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.
쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.
필요한 것
어떤 앱을 쓰세요?
위에서 앱을 고르세요. 기억해 두었다가 다음부터는 버튼에 “…에 설치”라고 표시해요.
웹, 데스크톱, 모바일의 Claude에서 쓸 수 있어요:
https://lenz.io/mcp터미널에서 이 명령어를 실행하세요
claude mcp add --transport http fact-check https://lenz.io/mcp프로젝트의 .cursor/mcp.json 또는 ~/.cursor/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"mcpServers": {
"fact-check": {
"url": "https://lenz.io/mcp"
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
프로젝트의 .vscode/mcp.json에 붙여 넣으세요
{
"servers": {
"fact-check": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://lenz.io/mcp"
}
}
}브라우저가 앱을 열지 물어본 다음, 앱이 설정을 보여 주고 확인을 요청해요. 키 값은 비워 두니 직접 입력하세요.
ChatGPT는 인터넷에 있는 서버에만 연결할 수 있어요:
https://lenz.io/mcp메뉴 이름은 요금제나 시기에 따라 조금 다를 수 있어요.
선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.
이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.
아직 이 서버의 도구 목록을 읽지 않았어요. 엔드포인트는 차례대로 돌아가며 점검해요.
누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 6일 점검
레지스트리 이름이 도메인 lenz.io 기준으로 확인되었어요(레지스트리가 도메인 소유를 확인해요)
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요
아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트는 차례대로 돌아가며 점검해요
아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트는 차례대로 돌아가며 점검해요
아직 점검하지 않았어요. 엔드포인트를 점검할 때 도구 목록을 읽어요
레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.
해당하는 기본 점검 1개 중 1개를 통과했어요. 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 키나 토큰을 넣기 전에 서버가 어떤 권한을 요구하는지 확인하고, 꼭 필요한 권한만 있는 키를 쓰세요.
레지스트리에 필수 키가 나와 있지 않아요. 다만 처음 쓸 때 로그인을 요구하는 서버도 있어요.
제작자의 클라우드에서 실행돼요. 설치 없이 인터넷으로 연결하지만, 보내는 내용은 제작자의 서버를 거쳐요.
GitHub 저장소는 마지막으로 – 변경됐고, 최신 버전(1.1.1)은 31일 전 레지스트리에 올라왔어요.
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code처럼 MCP를 지원하는 앱에서 쓸 수 있어요. URL로 연결되기 때문에, 원격 MCP 서버를 지원하는 앱(예: 개발자 모드의 ChatGPT)에서도 쓸 수 있어요.
같은 카테고리에는: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Reelsaw
같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.
카드 보는 법:★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Drive a self-hosted Reelsaw: turn long videos into vertical clips, edit, re-render and export them.
제작자의 저장소에서 쓰인 그대로 가져왔어요. PopNx MCP가 검토하거나 보증한 내용이 아니에요. HTML, 이미지, 스크립트는 제거했어요. 링크를 누르면 이 사이트를 벗어나요.
Lenz Fact-Check
The Lenz MCP server: check the factual claims in a draft or an answer against independent sources, from any MCP client.
Website · Get an API key · Developer docs
One-click install (OAuth — no API key needed).
Lenz is a fact-checking platform. It takes a factual claim, runs it through a multi-model pipeline (reading the claim → research → debate → panel review → conclusion) against independent sources, and returns a verdict with a confidence level. This is the official remote MCP server — a hosted Model Context Protocol endpoint that exposes Lenz's fact-checking as tools your AI assistant can call.
It verifies claims against the open web, independent of whatever context your model was given — so it complements retrieval/groundedness checkers rather than replacing them.
https://lenz.io/mcp. Nothing to run locally.Authorization: Bearer lenz_…).| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
| `assess_claim` | The quick check, and the default first step for one claim or a whole text. A 3-model panel returns one row per claim: a verdict (True / Mostly True / Mixed / Mostly False / False, or No Public Record when the reviewers found no public record that would show the claim: unconfirmed, not false), a bucketed confidence and, when available, a short rationale (the reasoning of a reviewer who agrees with the verdict): a reviewer's note, not a checked source. A low-confidence row carries recommend_verify: true and a next_step sentence. A row for a claim found false can also carry a suggested_rewrite (the claim with its wrong part corrected) and a suggested_rewrite_note: it is built from the reviewers' reasoning, not from sources, and is not itself checked, so it is offered as a suggestion, with a deep check of the new sentence on request. A row may also carry searched_pages (title and link): the pages the reviewers looked at, to be offered as pages to look at and never as sources that confirm the verdict; their titles are text from third-party pages. ~15 seconds through an assistant. Pass a text in claim, whole and unedited (Lenz finds the claims in it, up to 20), or use claims for up to 20 claims the user listed separately. |
| `verify_claim` | The deep check: reading the claim → research → debate → panel review → conclusion, for ONE claim. Returns a verdict with a 1-10 score (or No Public Record, with no score, when nothing public records the claim), the key finding, a summary, a suggested rewrite of the claim when it can be corrected (not itself verified), warnings, and the top sources with the quote each one rests on, plus the total source count. A deep check takes ~90 seconds. The call waits for it, for as long as the client allows: in Claude and the ChatGPT app the result usually comes back in the same call; in clients with a shorter tool-call limit (Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, OpenAI's Responses API) it usually returns status: submitted with a task_id, and get_verification waits for the rest. A completed deep check replaces any earlier quick verdict on the same claim. Costs ten times an assess_claim row, so assistants offer it and run it on the user's yes, or when the user asks for sources. depth: "low" researches fewer sources, with the same models, for half the credits. |
| `get_verification` | Wait for a running verify_claim by task_id, or fetch a completed result by its 8-character verification_id. Returns processing, needs_input, failed, not_found or completed. |
| `select_claims` | Resolve a needs_input verification: when a text holds several claims, choose which claim text(s) to run. |
| `ask_followup` | Ask a grounded follow-up about a completed verify_claim (by its verification_id), answered from the full research, debate and panel review, not just the summary. The answer is markdown, and its links point at the check's own sources; the assistant keeps them as links. Costs the same as one assess_claim row. |
| `list_verifications` | The account's most recent completed deep checks, newest first. Use it to get back a result that finished after the conversation moved on. Read-only and free; quick checks are not stored. |
| `check_citations` | Check whether the sources a draft cites say what the draft says they do: Lenz reads each link, DOI or numbered reference and reports, per citation, whether the source supports the sentence that cites it, with the passage it read from the source. Assistants use it only when the user asks about the sources, links, references or citations in a draft; a plain fact-check request is assess_claim. Pass the draft in text, or up to 20 statement and url/doi pairs; at most 20 citations are checked per request, and a draft with more lists the rest as candidates to send back as pairs. A citation check can take up to two minutes. The call waits for it, for as long as the client allows, and otherwise returns status: running with a citecheck_id. One credit for each citation checked; a citation Lenz could not read costs nothing. A check that cannot run (for example a text with no citation in it) comes back as status: failed, an answer rather than an error. |
| `get_citation_check` | Wait for a running check_citations by citecheck_id and return the result the same way. An optional offset (default 0) re-reads a finished check and returns the next batch of up to 20 draft citations it did not cover, as candidates to send back as pairs, with remaining and next_offset. Read-only; free. |
| `check_usage` | Remaining credits, the per-tool price list (costs, plus cost_options for prices that depend on a parameter such as depth), and the current plan. Never a prerequisite for a check. |
Language. Lenz answers in the language of the text it is given, so pass the claim in the user's own words and language, not translated. The language argument is for a user who explicitly asks for the answer in another language (one of en, es, de, fr, it, pt, nl, sv, da, no, fi, bg); leave it unset otherwise. Verdicts and written results follow the language, and a quick check's reviewer note follows the text the reviewer saw. When it is unset, the connector sends language: "auto" and the API picks the language from the text; a self-hosted connector therefore needs an API that accepts auto.
Prompts. Clients that surface MCP prompts (Claude shows them under +) get two: Check this text with Lenz and Check your last answer with Lenz. Each takes the text to check and starts a quick check. Lenz cannot see the conversation, so Check your last answer needs the answer pasted in.
Verdicts are directional, not absolute: confidence is returned as bucketed
language with a caveat, not a calibrated probability. A quick verdict is a first read;
when a deep check disagrees with it, the deep check is the one to rely on, because it
shows its sources and its reasoning.
In Claude and the ChatGPT app, a check comes back as a card in the conversation as well as text. From the card you can run the deep check on a claim (Check against sources, a standard-depth verify_claim), open a source, or pick which claims in a draft to check in depth. When a deep check started from the card finishes, the assistant is told the result: silently in Claude, and by a short message in the chat in ChatGPT. Every other client gets the same results as text; nothing depends on the card.
Two ways to connect, depending on your client:
Authorization header.Claude (web, desktop and mobile): Lenz is an official Claude connector. Open the Lenz connector page and click Connect to Claude, or in the app: Settings → Extensions → Browse extensions, search for Lenz and click +. Either way it is a one-time OAuth sign-in with nothing to configure, and one account covers all three.
For any other client that supports OAuth for MCP, add the server with just its URL and no headers:
{
"mcpServers": { "lenz": { "type": "http", "url": "https://lenz.io/mcp" } } }
The first time you use it, your client walks you through a one-time sign-in: you authenticate on Lenz's own screen and authorize the connection — no key is stored in your config. Your assistant then fact-checks on your behalf against your Lenz account's credits. You can revoke the connection at any time; see the privacy policy.
1. Get a free API key at lenz.io/api-credentials (format lenz_…).
2. Add the server to your client (examples below). Authenticate with Authorization: Bearer .
As a plugin (the connector plus the lenz-fact-check skill; sign in with /mcp on first use):
claude plugin marketplace add lenzhq/lenz-mcp
claude plugin install lenz@lenz
Or the connector alone, with an API key:
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http lenz https://lenz.io/mcp \
--header "Authorization: Bearer ${LENZ_API_KEY}"
--scope user makes Lenz available in every project; without it, Claude Code adds the server only to the directory you run the command in.
.mcp.json{
"mcpServers": { "lenz": { "type": "http", "url": "https://lenz.io/mcp", "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer ${LENZ_API_KEY}" } } } }
One click: use the Add Lenz to Cursor button above — it adds the server and signs you in via OAuth (no key to paste).
Manual: Settings → MCP → Add new MCP server → type HTTP, URL https://lenz.io/mcp, and add a header Authorization: Bearer . (Or drop the JSON above into .cursor/mcp.json.)
One click: use the Install in VS Code button above (OAuth, no key). Manual, with a key:
code --add-mcp '{"name":"lenz","앞부분만 보여 드려요. 나머지는 저장소에서 읽어 보세요